Mahal Amandeep S, Rhoads Kim F, Elliott Christopher S, Sokol Eric R
1Urogynecology & Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology 2Colorectal Surgery, Department of General Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 3Division of Urology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, Santa Clara, CA 4Department of Urology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Menopause. 2017 Aug;24(8):947-953. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000000875.
We assessed rates of oophorectomy during benign hysterectomy around the release of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists 2008 practice bulletin on prophylactic oophorectomy, and evaluated predictors of inappropriate premenopausal oophorectomy.
A cross-sectional administrative database analysis was performed utilizing the California Office of Statewide Health Planning Development Patient Discharge Database for years 2005 to 2011. After identifying all premenopausal women undergoing hysterectomy for benign conditions, International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9 diagnosis codes were reviewed to create a master list of indications for oophorectomy. We defined appropriate oophorectomy as cases with concomitant coding for ovarian cyst, breast cancer susceptibility gene carrier status, and other diagnoses. Using patient demographics and hospital characteristics to predict inappropriate oophorectomy, a logistic regression model was created.
We identified 57,776 benign premenopausal hysterectomies with oophorectomies during the period studied. Of the premenopausal oophorectomies, 37.7% (21,783) were deemed "inappropriate" with no documented reason for removal. The total number of premenopausal inpatient hysterectomies with oophorectomy decreased yearly (12,227/y in 2005 to 5,930/y in 2011). However, the percentage of inappropriate oophorectomies remained stable. In multivariate analysis, Hispanic and African American ethnicity/race associated with increased odds of inappropriate oophorectomy (P < 0.001). Urban and at low Medi-Cal utilization hospitals showed increased odds of inappropriate oophorectomy.
In premenopausal women undergoing benign hysterectomy, over one-third undergo oophorectomy without an appropriate indication documented. The rate of inappropriate oophorectomy in California has not changed since the 2008 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists guidelines. Whereas the absolute number of inpatient hysterectomies for benign indications has decreased, our work suggests persistent utilization of oophorectomy in premenopausal women, despite well-documented long-term adverse health implications.
我们评估了在美国妇产科医师学会2008年关于预防性卵巢切除术的实践公告发布前后,良性子宫切除术中卵巢切除术的发生率,并评估了绝经前不适当卵巢切除术的预测因素。
利用加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划与发展办公室患者出院数据库对2005年至2011年的数据进行横断面管理数据库分析。在确定所有因良性疾病接受子宫切除术的绝经前妇女后,审查国际疾病分类(ICD)-9诊断代码,以创建卵巢切除术指征主列表。我们将适当的卵巢切除术定义为伴有卵巢囊肿编码、乳腺癌易感基因携带者状态及其他诊断的病例。利用患者人口统计学和医院特征预测不适当的卵巢切除术,建立逻辑回归模型。
在研究期间,我们确定了57776例绝经前良性子宫切除术伴卵巢切除术。在绝经前卵巢切除术中,37.7%(21783例)被认为“不适当”,且无记录在案的切除原因。绝经前住院子宫切除术伴卵巢切除术的总数逐年下降(2005年为12227例/年,2011年为5930例/年)。然而,不适当卵巢切除术的百分比保持稳定。多因素分析显示,西班牙裔和非裔美国人种族与不适当卵巢切除术的几率增加相关(P<0.001)。城市医院和医疗补助利用率低的医院不适当卵巢切除术的几率增加。
在接受良性子宫切除术的绝经前妇女中,超过三分之一的人在没有适当记录指征的情况下接受了卵巢切除术。自2008年美国妇产科医师学会发布指南以来,加利福尼亚州不适当卵巢切除术的发生率没有变化。尽管有充分记录的长期健康不良影响,但良性指征住院子宫切除术的绝对数量有所下降,我们的研究表明绝经前妇女仍持续进行卵巢切除术。