Stentz Natalie C, Cooney Laura G, Sammel Mary, Shah Divya K
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;129(6):1007-1013. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002035.
To examine the association between the 2014 U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) safety communication on power morcellation and surgical approach and morbidity after myomectomy.
In this retrospective cohort study, data were abstracted from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database on 3,160 myomectomies between April 2012 and December 2013 (pre-FDA) and 4,378 between April 2014 and December 2015 (post-FDA). Aims were to 1) compare rates of abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy pre-FDA and post-FDA (primary outcome), 2) directly compare the morbidity of abdominal and laparoscopic myomectomy during each time period (secondary outcome 1), and 3) compare the morbidity after all myomectomies performed pre-FDA and post-FDA (secondary outcome 2). Adjusted means, odds ratios, and rate ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using linear, logistic, and Poisson regression, respectively, adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, body mass index, and myoma burden.
Myomectomies performed post-FDA were more likely to be abdominal (60.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 58.6-61.5%) than laparoscopic (40.0%, 95% CI 38.5-41.4%) as compared with myomectomies pre-FDA, which were equally divided between surgical approaches (49.1% abdominal, 95% CI 47.4-50.9% compared with 50.9% laparoscopic, 95% CI 49.1-52.6%; P<.001). When directly compared with laparoscopic myomectomy, abdominal myomectomy was associated with longer hospitalizations, higher readmission rates, and greater morbidity both pre-FDA and post-FDA (P<.05, all comparisons). Adjusted models demonstrated shorter operative times post-FDA for all myomectomies (P<.001), although composite morbidity was similar between myomectomies performed pre-FDA and post-FDA (P=.809).
The FDA safety communication on power morcellation was associated with an 11% absolute increase in the use of abdominal myomectomy. Although morbidity is consistently higher after abdominal as compared with laparoscopic myomectomy, the increased reliance on abdominal myomectomy post-FDA did not result in clinically significant changes in morbidity in this cohort.
探讨2014年美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)关于动力旋切术的安全通报与子宫肌瘤剔除术的手术方式及术后发病率之间的关联。
在这项回顾性队列研究中,数据取自美国外科医师学会国家外科质量改进计划数据库,2012年4月至2013年12月期间(FDA通报前)有3160例子宫肌瘤剔除术,2014年4月至2015年12月期间(FDA通报后)有4378例。目的是:1)比较FDA通报前后腹式和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的比率(主要结局);2)直接比较各时间段内腹式和腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术的发病率(次要结局1);3)比较FDA通报前后所有子宫肌瘤剔除术的发病率(次要结局2)。分别使用线性回归、逻辑回归和泊松回归计算调整均值、比值比和率比及其95%置信区间,并对年龄、种族、民族、体重指数和肌瘤负荷进行校正。
与FDA通报前手术方式平分秋色的子宫肌瘤剔除术(腹式49.1%,95%置信区间47.4 - 50.9%;腹腔镜50.9%,95%置信区间49.1 - 52.6%)相比,FDA通报后的子宫肌瘤剔除术更可能采用腹式(60.0%,95%置信区间58.6 - 61.5%)而非腹腔镜式(40.0%,95%置信区间38.5 - 41.4%)(P<0.001)。与腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术直接比较时,腹式子宫肌瘤剔除术在FDA通报前后均与住院时间更长、再入院率更高及发病率更高相关(所有比较P<0.05)。校正模型显示,所有子宫肌瘤剔除术在FDA通报后的手术时间更短(P<0.001),尽管FDA通报前后进行的子宫肌瘤剔除术的综合发病率相似(P = 0.809)。
FDA关于动力旋切术的安全通报与腹式子宫肌瘤剔除术使用率绝对增加11%相关。尽管腹式子宫肌瘤剔除术后的发病率始终高于腹腔镜子宫肌瘤剔除术,但FDA通报后对腹式子宫肌瘤剔除术的更多依赖并未导致该队列中发病率出现临床显著变化。