Suppr超能文献

微创子宫肌瘤治疗中的组织提取方法现状。

Current Methods of Tissue Extraction in Minimally Invasive Surgical Treatment of Uterine Fibroids.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Science, Mt, Sinai Hospital, New York, New York.

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, New York-Presbyterian Weill, Cornell Medical Center, New York, New York.

出版信息

JSLS. 2022 Jul-Sep;26(3). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2022.00036.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Since the 2014 Food and Drug Administration communication regarding the use of power morcellation, gynecologists have adopted alternative tissue extraction strategies. The objective of this study is to investigate the current techniques used by gynecologic surgeons for tissue extraction following minimally invasive hysterectomy or myomectomy for fibroids.

METHODS

An online survey was distributed to all AAGL members and responses were collected between March 26, 2019 and April 17, 2019.

RESULTS

Four hundred thirty-six respondents completed the survey. For hysterectomy, the most common methods of tissue extraction were manual morcellation through the colpotomy (72.4%) or minilaparotomy (66.9%). Nearly one-third (31.7%) endorsed using power morcellation. For myomectomy, manual morcellation via minilaparotomy (71.9%) was the most common approach, followed by power morcellation (35.7%). Use of containment bags was common. Minilaparotomy incisions were typically three cm and most often at the umbilicus.Geographic differences were detected, particularly with power morcellation. During hysterectomy, 18.4% of US-based surgeons reported its use, compared to 56.9% of nonUS-based surgeons. During myomectomy, 20.5% of US-based surgeons reported its use compared to 67.5% of their international counterparts. Age, years in practice, fellowship training, and practice location were all significantly associated with power morcellator use.

CONCLUSION

A large majority of practitioners are performing manual morcellation through the colpotomy or minilaparotomy. Use of containment bags is common with all routes of tissue removal. Power morcellation use is less common in the United States than in other countries.

摘要

背景与目的

自 2014 年美国食品和药物管理局发布关于使用电动组织粉碎器的通告以来,妇科医生已经采用了替代的组织提取策略。本研究旨在调查妇科医生在微创子宫切除术或子宫肌瘤剔除术后,用于提取组织的当前技术。

方法

向所有 AAGL 成员分发了在线调查,于 2019 年 3 月 26 日至 2019 年 4 月 17 日期间收集回复。

结果

436 名受访者完成了调查。对于子宫切除术,组织提取最常用的方法是通过阴道切开术(72.4%)或小剖腹术(66.9%)进行手动粉碎。近三分之一(31.7%)的人认可使用电动粉碎器。对于子宫肌瘤剔除术,小剖腹术(71.9%)是最常用的方法,其次是电动粉碎器(35.7%)。使用容器袋很常见。小剖腹术切口通常为 3 厘米,大多位于脐部。还发现了地理差异,尤其是在使用电动粉碎器方面。在美国,18.4%的妇科医生报告在子宫切除术中使用了它,而非美国的妇科医生则有 56.9%报告使用了它。在子宫肌瘤剔除术中,18.4%的美国医生报告使用了它,而其国际同行中有 67.5%报告使用了它。年龄、执业年限、专科培训和执业地点均与电动粉碎器的使用显著相关。

结论

绝大多数医生通过阴道切开术或小剖腹术进行手动粉碎。使用容器袋在所有组织切除途径中都很常见。在美国,电动粉碎器的使用比其他国家更为少见。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/24d5/9385112/b7f454aec410/LS-JSLS220047F001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验