• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性状-生长模型是否具有可转移性?利用植物功能性状预测生态系统间的多物种生长轨迹。

Are trait-growth models transferable? Predicting multi-species growth trajectories between ecosystems using plant functional traits.

作者信息

Thomas Freya M, Vesk Peter A

机构信息

School of BioSciences, ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0176959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176959. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0176959
PMID:28486535
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5423618/
Abstract

Plant functional traits are increasingly used to generalize across species, however few examples exist of predictions from trait-based models being evaluated in new species or new places. Can we use functional traits to predict growth of unknown species in different areas? We used three independently collected datasets, each containing data on heights of individuals from non-resprouting species over a chronosquence of time-since-fire sites from three ecosystems in south-eastern Australia. We examined the influence of specific leaf area, woody density, seed size and leaf nitrogen content on three aspects of plant growth; maximum relative growth rate, age at maximum growth and asymptotic height. We tested our capacity to perform out-of-sample prediction of growth trajectories between ecosystems using species functional traits. We found strong trait-growth relationships in one of the datasets; whereby species with low SLA achieved the greatest asymptotic heights, species with high leaf-nitrogen content achieved relatively fast growth rates, and species with low seed mass reached their time of maximum growth early. However these same growth-trait relationships did not hold across the two other datasets, making accurate prediction from one dataset to another unachievable. We believe there is evidence to suggest that growth trajectories themselves may be fundamentally different between ecosystems and that trait-height-growth relationships may change over environmental gradients.

摘要

植物功能性状越来越多地被用于对物种进行概括,然而,基于性状的模型预测在新物种或新地点得到评估的例子却很少。我们能否利用功能性状来预测不同地区未知物种的生长情况?我们使用了三个独立收集的数据集,每个数据集都包含来自澳大利亚东南部三个生态系统中自火灾发生后的不同时间序列上非萌蘖物种个体高度的数据。我们研究了比叶面积、木质密度、种子大小和叶片氮含量对植物生长三个方面的影响;最大相对生长速率、最大生长年龄和渐近高度。我们测试了利用物种功能性状对生态系统间生长轨迹进行样本外预测的能力。我们在其中一个数据集中发现了很强的性状-生长关系;即比叶面积低的物种达到了最大的渐近高度,叶片氮含量高的物种实现了相对较快的生长速率,种子质量低的物种较早达到其最大生长时间。然而,这些相同的生长-性状关系在其他两个数据集中并不成立,使得从一个数据集到另一个数据集进行准确预测变得无法实现。我们认为有证据表明,不同生态系统之间的生长轨迹本身可能存在根本差异,而且性状-高度-生长关系可能会随着环境梯度而变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/b81024a4c766/pone.0176959.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/7c8b1c0e6616/pone.0176959.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/b71d365cf674/pone.0176959.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/6eda6070cd35/pone.0176959.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/0d3bed098693/pone.0176959.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/a0673d2812cd/pone.0176959.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/ca21db5926dc/pone.0176959.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/b81024a4c766/pone.0176959.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/7c8b1c0e6616/pone.0176959.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/b71d365cf674/pone.0176959.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/6eda6070cd35/pone.0176959.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/0d3bed098693/pone.0176959.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/a0673d2812cd/pone.0176959.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/ca21db5926dc/pone.0176959.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c68/5423618/b81024a4c766/pone.0176959.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Are trait-growth models transferable? Predicting multi-species growth trajectories between ecosystems using plant functional traits.性状-生长模型是否具有可转移性?利用植物功能性状预测生态系统间的多物种生长轨迹。
PLoS One. 2017 May 9;12(5):e0176959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176959. eCollection 2017.
2
Relationship between leaf traits and fire-response strategies in shrub species of a mountainous region of south-eastern Australia.澳大利亚东南部山区灌木物种的叶特征与火响应策略之间的关系。
Ann Bot. 2012 Jan;109(1):197-208. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcr263. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
3
Meaningful traits for grouping plant species across arid ecosystems.用于对干旱生态系统中的植物物种进行分组的有意义特征。
J Plant Res. 2016 May;129(3):449-61. doi: 10.1007/s10265-016-0803-6. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
4
Size and Reproductive Traits Rather than Leaf Economic Traits Explain Plant-Community Composition in Species-Rich Annual Vegetation along a Gradient of Land Use Intensity.在土地利用强度梯度上,物种丰富的一年生植被中,决定植物群落组成的是大小和繁殖性状而非叶片经济性状。
Front Plant Sci. 2017 May 29;8:891. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00891. eCollection 2017.
5
Light-acquisition traits link aboveground biomass and environment in inner saline-alkaline herbaceous marshes.高光捕获特性将内陆盐沼草本植物地上生物量与环境联系起来。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jan 20;857(Pt 3):159660. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159660. Epub 2022 Oct 24.
6
Growth form, regeneration mode, and vegetation type explain leaf trait variability at the species and community levels in Mediterranean woody vegetation.生长型、更新模式和植被类型解释了地中海木本植被在物种和群落水平上的叶片性状变异性。
Ecol Evol. 2024 Mar 11;14(3):e11145. doi: 10.1002/ece3.11145. eCollection 2024 Mar.
7
A synthesis of postfire recovery traits of woody plants in Australian ecosystems.澳大利亚生态系统中木本植物火后恢复特性的综合研究。
Sci Total Environ. 2015 Nov 15;534:31-42. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.04.002. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
8
Future changes in key plant traits across Central Europe vary with biogeographical status, woodiness, and habitat type.中欧主要植物性状的未来变化因生物地理状况、木质化程度和栖息地类型而异。
Sci Total Environ. 2024 Jan 10;907:167954. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167954. Epub 2023 Oct 20.
9
Global patterns of intraspecific leaf trait responses to elevation.全球种内叶片特征对海拔变化的响应模式。
Glob Chang Biol. 2019 Jul;25(7):2485-2498. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14646. Epub 2019 May 6.
10
Functional coordination between leaf traits and biomass allocation and growth of four herbaceous species in a newly established reservoir riparian ecosystem in China.中国新建水库河岸生态系统中四种草本植物叶片性状、生物量分配与生长之间的功能协调性
Ecol Evol. 2018 Nov 8;8(23):11372-11384. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4494. eCollection 2018 Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Widespread slow growth of acquisitive tree species.贪食性树种普遍生长缓慢。
Nature. 2025 Apr;640(8058):395-401. doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-08692-x. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
2
Drivers of Acacia and Eucalyptus growth rate differ in strength and direction in restoration plantings across Australia.在澳大利亚的植被恢复种植中,相思树和桉树的生长速度驱动力在强度和方向上存在差异。
Ecol Appl. 2022 Sep;32(6):e2636. doi: 10.1002/eap.2636. Epub 2022 Jun 2.
3
AusTraits, a curated plant trait database for the Australian flora.AusTraits,一个经过精心整理的澳大利亚植物区系植物性状数据库。

本文引用的文献

1
Relative importance of photosynthetic traits and allocation patterns as correlates of seedling shade tolerance of 13 tropical trees.光合特性和分配模式作为13种热带树木幼苗耐荫性相关因素的相对重要性
Oecologia. 1994 Aug;98(3-4):419-428. doi: 10.1007/BF00324232.
2
The global spectrum of plant form and function.全球植物形态和功能的多样性。
Nature. 2016 Jan 14;529(7585):167-71. doi: 10.1038/nature16489. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
3
Plant functional traits have globally consistent effects on competition.植物功能性状对竞争具有全球一致的影响。
Sci Data. 2021 Sep 30;8(1):254. doi: 10.1038/s41597-021-01006-6.
4
Using functional traits to predict species growth trajectories, and cross-validation to evaluate these models for ecological prediction.利用功能性状预测物种生长轨迹,并通过交叉验证来评估这些用于生态预测的模型。
Ecol Evol. 2019 Feb 6;9(4):1554-1566. doi: 10.1002/ece3.4693. eCollection 2019 Feb.
Nature. 2016 Jan 14;529(7585):204-7. doi: 10.1038/nature16476. Epub 2015 Dec 23.
4
Functional traits explain variation in plant life history strategies.功能特征可以解释植物生活史策略的变异。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Jan 14;111(2):740-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1315179111. Epub 2013 Dec 30.
5
Leaf traits within communities: context may affect the mapping of traits to function.群落内的叶性状:背景可能会影响性状到功能的映射。
Ecology. 2013 Sep;94(9):1893-7. doi: 10.1890/12-1602.1.
6
Differences in forest plant functional trait distributions across land-use and productivity gradients.森林植物功能性状在土地利用和生产力梯度上的分布差异。
Am J Bot. 2013 Jul;100(7):1356-68. doi: 10.3732/ajb.1200461. Epub 2013 Jul 3.
7
A unified approach to the Richards-model family for use in growth analyses: why we need only two model forms.用于生长分析的 Richards 模型族的统一方法:为什么我们只需要两种模型形式。
J Theor Biol. 2010 Dec 7;267(3):417-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2010.09.008. Epub 2010 Sep 8.
8
Are functional traits good predictors of demographic rates? Evidence from five neotropical forests.功能性状能否很好地预测种群统计学率?来自五个新热带森林的证据。
Ecology. 2008 Jul;89(7):1908-20. doi: 10.1890/07-0207.1.
9
A general model for the scaling of offspring size and adult size.一个关于后代体型与成体体型缩放的通用模型。
Am Nat. 2008 Sep;172(3):299-317. doi: 10.1086/589889.
10
Leaf traits determine the growth-survival trade-off across rain forest tree species.叶片性状决定了热带雨林树种间生长与存活的权衡。
Am Nat. 2006 May;167(5):758-65. doi: 10.1086/503056. Epub 2006 Mar 20.