Poh Chin L, Chiletti Roberto, Zannino Diana, Brizard Christian, Konstantinov Igor E, Horton Stephen, Millar Johnny, d'Udekem Yves
Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Heart Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Aug 1;25(2):310-316. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx066.
The capacity and limitations of ventricular assist device (VAD) support in single-ventricle physiology remains poorly understood. We aimed to review our experience in the use of VAD support in the single-ventricle circulation to determine its feasibility in this population.
We reviewed our experience with VAD support in patients with single ventricles over the past 25 years. Fifty-seven patients received 64 runs of VAD support between 1990 and 2015 at a median age of 13 days [interquartile range (IQR) 4.1-99.4 days], of which 55 were supported for post-cardiotomy failure. The majority of patients received short-term VAD support, while 4 patients were either directly supported (1) or transitioned onto the Berlin Heart EXCOR (3).
The median duration of support was 3.5 days (IQR 2.8-5.2 days). Twelve patients suffered significant neurological complications, and thromboembolic events occurred in 8 patients. Twenty-nine of the 55 patients were successfully weaned off support (53%). There were 37 inpatient deaths, with a survival-to-hospital discharge rate of 33% (18 of 55). Of the 4 patients supported after early Fontan failure, 3 died. Having a higher mean arterial blood pressure on initiation of VAD support was the only significant predictor of death (hazards ratio 1.08; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.14; P = 0.002). Patients who required a second run of support had higher hospital mortality (83% vs 63%; P = 0.84). Of the hospital survivors, 12 patients (63%) remain alive without heart transplantation at median 7.2 years (IQR 3.5-14.0) post VAD support.
VAD support in patients with a single ventricle has a high hospital mortality, with 1 of 3 patients surviving to discharge. Systemic VAD support is likely futile in the setting of early Fontan failure or when re-initiation of support is required.
对于单心室生理状态下心室辅助装置(VAD)支持的能力和局限性,目前仍了解不足。我们旨在回顾我们在单心室循环中使用VAD支持的经验,以确定其在该人群中的可行性。
我们回顾了过去25年中在单心室患者中使用VAD支持的经验。1990年至2015年期间,57例患者接受了64次VAD支持,中位年龄为13天[四分位间距(IQR)4.1 - 99.4天],其中55例因心脏术后衰竭接受支持。大多数患者接受短期VAD支持,而4例患者要么直接接受支持(1例),要么过渡到柏林心脏EXCOR(3例)。
支持的中位持续时间为3.5天(IQR 2.8 - 5.2天)。12例患者出现严重神经并发症,8例患者发生血栓栓塞事件。55例患者中有29例成功撤机(53%)。有37例住院死亡,出院生存率为33%(55例中的18例)。在早期Fontan手术失败后接受支持的4例患者中,3例死亡。开始VAD支持时平均动脉血压较高是死亡的唯一显著预测因素(风险比1.08;95%置信区间1.03 - 1.14;P = 0.002)。需要第二次支持的患者医院死亡率更高(83%对63%;P = 0.84)。在医院幸存者中,12例患者(63%)在VAD支持后中位7.2年(IQR 3.5 - 14.0)时存活且未进行心脏移植。
单心室患者的VAD支持医院死亡率很高,3例患者中只有1例存活至出院。在早期Fontan手术失败或需要再次开始支持的情况下,全身VAD支持可能无效。