Thomas Kelsey R, Edmonds Emily C, Delano-Wood Lisa, Bondi Mark W
1Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System,San Diego,California.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2017 Jul;23(6):521-527. doi: 10.1017/S1355617717000285. Epub 2017 May 10.
Within the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI)'s mild cognitive impairment (MCI) cohort, we previously identified MCI subtypes as well as participants initially diagnosed with MCI but found to have normal neuropsychological, biomarker, and neuroimaging profiles. We investigated the functional change over time in these empirically derived MCI subgroups.
ADNI MCI participants (n=654) were classified using cluster analysis as Amnestic MCI (single-domain memory impairment), Dysnomic MCI (memory+language impairments), Dysexecutive/Mixed MCI (memory+language+attention/executive impairments), or Cluster-Derived Normal (CDN). Robust normal control participants (NCs; n=284) were also examined. The Functional Activities Questionnaire (FAQ) was administered at baseline through 48-month follow-up. Multilevel modeling examined FAQ trajectories by cognitive subgroup.
The Dysexecutive/Mixed group demonstrated the fastest rate of decline across all groups. Amnestic and Dysnomic groups showed steeper rates of decline than CDNs. While CDNs had more functional difficulty than NCs across visits, both groups' mean FAQ scores remained below its suggested cutoff at all visits.
Results (a) show the importance of executive dysfunction in the context of other impaired cognitive domains when predicting functional decline in at-risk elders, and (b) support our previous work demonstrating that ADNI's MCI criteria may have resulted in false-positive MCI diagnoses, given the CDN's better FAQ trajectory than those of the cognitively impaired MCI groups. (JINS, 2017, 23, 521-527).
在阿尔茨海默病神经影像学计划(ADNI)的轻度认知障碍(MCI)队列中,我们之前已确定了MCI亚型以及最初被诊断为MCI但神经心理学、生物标志物和神经影像学检查结果均正常的参与者。我们研究了这些基于经验得出的MCI亚组随时间的功能变化。
采用聚类分析将ADNI的MCI参与者(n = 654)分为遗忘型MCI(单领域记忆障碍)、命名型MCI(记忆+语言障碍)、执行/混合型MCI(记忆+语言+注意力/执行功能障碍)或聚类衍生正常组(CDN)。还对健康正常对照参与者(NCs;n = 284)进行了检查。在基线至48个月随访期间进行功能活动问卷(FAQ)评估。采用多水平模型按认知亚组检查FAQ轨迹。
执行/混合型组在所有组中下降速度最快。遗忘型和命名型组的下降速度比CDN组更快。虽然CDN组在各次访视中的功能困难程度均高于NC组,但两组的平均FAQ评分在所有访视中均低于建议的临界值。
结果(a)表明,在预测高危老年人的功能衰退时,执行功能障碍在其他认知领域受损的背景下具有重要意义;(b)支持我们之前的研究工作,即鉴于CDN组的FAQ轨迹优于认知受损的MCI组,ADNI的MCI标准可能导致了假阳性的MCI诊断。(《神经影像学杂志》,2017年,第23卷,第521 - 527页)