Antonio Maite, Saldaña Juana, Carmona-Bayonas Alberto, Navarro Valentín, Tebé Cristian, Nadal Marga, Formiga Francesc, Salazar Ramon, Borràs Josep Maria
Medical Oncology Department, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-Hospital Duran i Reynals, University of Barcelona, Spain
Medical Oncology Department, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL), Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO)-Hospital Duran i Reynals, University of Barcelona, Spain.
Oncologist. 2017 Aug;22(8):934-943. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0462. Epub 2017 May 9.
The challenge when selecting elderly patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) for adjuvant therapy is to estimate the likelihood that death from other causes will preclude cancer events from occurring. The aim of this paper is to evaluate whether comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) can predict survival and cancer-specific mortality in elderly CRC patients candidates for adjuvant therapy.
One hundred ninety-five consecutive patients aged ≥75 with high-risk stage II and stage III CRC were prospectively included from May 2008 to May 2015. All patients underwent CGA, which evaluated comorbidity, polypharmacy, functional status, geriatric syndromes, mood, cognition, and social support. According to CGA results, patients were classified into three groups-fit, medium-fit, and unfit-to receive standard therapy, adjusted treatment, and best supportive care, respectively. We recorded survival and cause of death and used the Fine-Gray regression model to analyze competing causes of death.
Following CGA, 85 (43%) participants were classified as fit, 57 (29%) as medium-fit, and 53 (28%) as unfit. The univariate 5-year survival rates were 74%, 52%, and 27%. Sixty-one (31%) patients died due to cancer progression (53%), non-cancer-related cause (46%), and unknown reasons (1%); there were no toxicity-related deaths. Fit and medium-fit participants were more likely to die due to cancer progression, whereas patients classified as unfit were at significantly greater risk of non-cancer-related death.
CGA showed efficacy in predicting survival and discriminating between causes of death in elderly patients with high-risk stage II and stage III resected CRC, with potential implications for shaping the decision-making process for adjuvant therapies.
Adjuvant therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer is controversial due to the high risk for competing events among these patients. In order to effectively select older patients for adjuvant therapy, we have to weigh the risk of cancer-related mortality and the potential survival benefits with treatment against the patient's life expectancy, irrespective of cancer. This prospective study focused on the prognostic value of geriatric assessment for survival using a competing-risk analysis approach, providing an important contribution on the treatment decision-making process and helping clinicians to identify elderly patients who might benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy among those who will not.
在选择老年结直肠癌(CRC)患者进行辅助治疗时面临的挑战是评估死于其他原因是否会使癌症相关事件无法发生。本文旨在评估综合老年评估(CGA)能否预测辅助治疗候选老年CRC患者的生存情况及癌症特异性死亡率。
2008年5月至2015年5月前瞻性纳入195例年龄≥75岁的高危II期和III期CRC患者。所有患者均接受CGA,评估合并症、多重用药、功能状态、老年综合征、情绪、认知及社会支持情况。根据CGA结果,患者被分为三组,分别为适合接受标准治疗组、中度适合接受调整治疗组和不适合接受治疗组,分别给予标准治疗、调整治疗及最佳支持治疗。我们记录了生存情况和死亡原因,并使用Fine-Gray回归模型分析竞争性死亡原因。
CGA后,85例(43%)参与者被分类为适合,57例(29%)为中度适合,53例(28%)为不适合。单因素分析5年生存率分别为74%、52%和27%。61例(31%)患者死于癌症进展(53%)、非癌症相关原因(46%)及不明原因(1%);无毒性相关死亡。适合和中度适合的参与者更可能死于癌症进展,而被分类为不适合的患者非癌症相关死亡风险显著更高。
CGA在预测高危II期和III期切除的老年CRC患者的生存情况及区分死亡原因方面显示出有效性,对辅助治疗决策过程具有潜在影响。
老年结直肠癌患者的辅助治疗存在争议,因为这些患者中竞争性事件风险较高。为了有效选择老年患者进行辅助治疗,我们必须权衡癌症相关死亡率风险以及治疗带来的潜在生存获益与患者的预期寿命,而不考虑癌症情况。这项前瞻性研究使用竞争性风险分析方法关注老年评估对生存的预后价值,为治疗决策过程做出了重要贡献,并帮助临床医生在那些不会受益的患者中识别出可能从辅助化疗中获益的老年患者。