Kou Mei-Jing, Ding Xiu-Fang, Chen Jia-Xu, Liu Yan, Liu Yue-Yun
School of Basic Medical Science, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.
School of Pre-clinical Medicine, Hubei University of Chinese Medicine, Wuhan 430061, China.
Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med. 2016 Aug 12;13(5):160-169. doi: 10.21010/ajtcam.v13i5.21. eCollection 2016.
This meta-analysis aimed to provide critically estimated evidence for the advantages and disadvantages of Chinese herbal medicines used for premature ovarian failure (POF), which could provide suggestions for rational treatments.
The databases searched included MEDLINE, EMBASE, CNKI, VIP, China Dissertation Database, China Important Conference Papers Database, and online clinical trial registry websites. Published and unpublished randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) combined with hormone therapy (HT) and HT alone for POF were assessed up to December 30, 2015. Two authors extracted data and assessed trial quality independently using Cochrane systematic review methods. Meta-analysis was used to quantitatively describe serum hormone levels and Kupperman scores associated with perimenopause symptoms.
Seventeen randomized controlled trials involving 1352 participants were selected. Compared with HT alone, although no significant effects were observed in the levels of luteinizing hormone, therapy with TCM combined with HT compared to HT alone effectively altered serum hormone levels of follicle stimulating hormone (<0.01) and estradiol ( < 0.01), and improved Kupperman index scores (< 0.01).
The reported favorable effects of TCM combined with HT for treating POF patients are better than HT alone.However, the beneficial effects derived from this combination therapy cannot be viewed conclusive. In order to better support the clinical use, more rigorously designed trials are required to provide.
本荟萃分析旨在为用于卵巢早衰(POF)的中药的优缺点提供严格评估的证据,可为合理治疗提供建议。
检索的数据库包括MEDLINE、EMBASE、中国知网、维普资讯、中国学位论文数据库、中国重要会议论文数据库以及在线临床试验注册网站。截至2015年12月30日,对已发表和未发表的关于中药联合激素疗法(HT)与单纯激素疗法治疗POF的随机对照试验进行评估。两名作者独立提取数据并使用Cochrane系统评价方法评估试验质量。采用荟萃分析定量描述与围绝经期症状相关的血清激素水平和库珀曼评分。
共纳入17项随机对照试验,涉及1352名参与者。与单纯激素疗法相比,虽然促黄体生成素水平未观察到显著影响,但与单纯激素疗法相比,中药联合激素疗法有效改变了促卵泡生成素(<0.01)和雌二醇(<0.01)的血清激素水平,并改善了库珀曼指数评分(<0.01)。
报道的中药联合激素疗法治疗POF患者的良好效果优于单纯激素疗法。然而,这种联合疗法的有益效果不能被视为定论。为了更好地支持临床应用,需要进行更严格设计的试验。