• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癌症筛查不仅仅关乎数字。

Cancer screening is not only about numbers.

作者信息

Knottnerus B J

机构信息

Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 May;26(3). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12700. Epub 2017 May 10.

DOI:10.1111/ecc.12700
PMID:28488741
Abstract

In the cancer screening debate, arguments for and against screening are often based on statistics, whereas for individuals personal, non-statistical factors are at least as important when deciding whether to participate in screening. Health care professionals have a responsibility in helping individuals navigate in this complex field by identifying and clarifying the individuals' beliefs, fears and preferences while being aware of their own. Moreover, researchers should explore beliefs and motives that matter for individuals and not only report numbers that can be interpreted in different ways.

摘要

在癌症筛查的辩论中,支持和反对筛查的论点通常基于统计数据,然而对于个人而言,在决定是否参与筛查时,个人的、非统计性的因素至少同样重要。医疗保健专业人员有责任通过识别和阐明个人的信念、恐惧和偏好,同时了解自身的情况,帮助个人在这个复杂的领域中做出抉择。此外,研究人员应该探究对个人重要的信念和动机,而不仅仅是报告那些可以有不同解读方式的数字。

相似文献

1
Cancer screening is not only about numbers.癌症筛查不仅仅关乎数字。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 May;26(3). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12700. Epub 2017 May 10.
2
[Cancer screening in the elderly: Explorative mixed methods study].[老年人的癌症筛查:探索性混合方法研究]
Z Gerontol Geriatr. 2016 Jan;49(1):44-51. doi: 10.1007/s00391-015-0920-1. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
3
Defining responsibility for screening.明确筛查责任。
Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 1999 Oct;8(4):611-21, v-vi.
4
Preferences for colorectal cancer screening techniques and intention to attend: a multi-criteria decision analysis.结直肠癌筛查技术的偏好与参与意愿:多标准决策分析
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013 Oct;11(5):499-507. doi: 10.1007/s40258-013-0051-z.
5
[Meaningful words? Cancer screening communication in Italy].
Epidemiol Prev. 2012 Mar-Apr;36(2):120-5.
6
Helping patients cope with cancer.
Oncology (Williston Park). 1989 Nov;3(11):120-9; discussion 129-31.
7
[Balancing benefits and harms of population-based interventions, using the example of cancer screening].[以癌症筛查为例,权衡基于人群的干预措施的利弊]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(3):176-82. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2011.03.004. Epub 2011 Mar 26.
8
Arthritis patients' motives for (not) wanting to be involved in medical decision-making and the factors that hinder or promote patient involvement.关节炎患者(不)愿意参与医疗决策的动机以及阻碍或促进患者参与的因素。
Clin Rheumatol. 2016 May;35(5):1225-35. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2820-y. Epub 2014 Nov 14.
9
A qualitative study on a decision aid for breast cancer screening: Views from women and health professionals.一项关于乳腺癌筛查决策辅助工具的定性研究:女性和健康专业人员的观点
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 May;26(3). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12660. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
What factors do patients consider most important in making lung cancer screening decisions? Findings from a demonstration project conducted in the Veterans Health Administration.患者在做出肺癌筛查决策时最看重哪些因素?退伍军人健康管理局开展的一项示范项目的调查结果。
Lung Cancer. 2017 Feb;104:38-44. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Nov 29.