1 Health Services Research and Development, and.
2 Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine.
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017 Nov;14(11):1690-1696. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201612-1021OC.
Patient participation in medical decision-making is widely advocated, but outcomes are inconsistent.
We examined the associations between medical decision-making roles, and patients' perceptions of their care and knowledge while undergoing pulmonary nodule surveillance.
The study setting was an academically affiliated Veterans Affairs hospital network in which 121 participants had 319 decision-making encounters. The Control Preferences Scale was used to assess patients' decision-making roles. Associations between decision-making, including role concordance (i.e., agreement between patients' preferred and actual roles), shared decision-making (SDM), and perceptions of care and knowledge, were assessed using logistic regression and generalized estimating equations.
Participants had a preferred role in 98% of encounters, and most desired an active role (shared or patient controlled). For some encounters (36%), patients did not report their actual decision-making role, because they did not know what their role was. Role concordance and SDM occurred in 56% and 26% of encounters, respectively. Role concordance was associated with greater satisfaction with medical care (adjusted odds ratio [Adj-OR], 5.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.68-17.26), higher quality of patient-reported care (Adj-OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.31-6.27), and more disagreement that care could be better (Adj-OR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.12-4.16). Role concordance was not associated with improved pulmonary nodule knowledge with respect to lung cancer risk (Adj-OR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.63-2.00) or nodule information received (Adj-OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.31-4.13). SDM was not associated with perceptions of care or knowledge.
Among patients undergoing longitudinal nodule surveillance, a majority had a preference for having active roles in decision-making. Interestingly, during some encounters, patients did not know what their role was or that a decision was being made. Role concordance was associated with greater patient-reported satisfaction and quality of medical care, but not with improved knowledge. Patient participation in decision-making may influence perceptions of care; however, clinicians may need to focus on other communication strategies or domains to improve patient knowledge and health outcomes.
患者参与医疗决策已被广泛提倡,但结果却不一致。
我们研究了医疗决策角色与患者在接受肺结节监测期间对其护理和知识的感知之间的关系。
该研究在一个学术附属的退伍军人事务部医院网络中进行,其中 121 名参与者进行了 319 次决策。使用控制偏好量表来评估患者的决策角色。使用逻辑回归和广义估计方程评估决策之间的关联,包括角色一致性(即患者偏好和实际角色之间的一致性)、共享决策(SDM)以及对护理和知识的感知。
在 98%的情况下,参与者对他们的决策角色有一个偏好,并且大多数人希望扮演积极的角色(共享或患者控制)。对于一些情况(36%),患者没有报告他们的实际决策角色,因为他们不知道自己的角色是什么。角色一致性和 SDM 分别发生在 56%和 26%的情况下。角色一致性与对医疗护理的满意度更高(调整后的优势比[Adj-OR],5.39;95%置信区间[CI],1.68-17.26)、更高质量的患者报告护理(Adj-OR,2.86;95%CI,1.31-6.27)和对护理可以更好的更多分歧(Adj-OR,2.16;95%CI,1.12-4.16)相关。角色一致性与关于肺癌风险的肺结节知识的提高无关(Adj-OR,1.12;95%CI,0.63-2.00)或结节信息的接收(Adj-OR,1.13;95%CI,0.31-4.13)。SDM 与护理或知识的感知无关。
在接受纵向结节监测的患者中,大多数人更喜欢在决策中扮演积极的角色。有趣的是,在某些情况下,患者不知道自己的角色是什么,也不知道正在做出决定。角色一致性与患者报告的满意度和医疗护理质量更高相关,但与知识提高无关。患者参与决策可能会影响对护理的看法;但是,临床医生可能需要专注于其他沟通策略或领域,以提高患者的知识和健康结果。