• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于技能的干预措施以增强共同决策:针对患有精神病的退伍军人的系统改编及开放试验方案

Skills-based intervention to enhance collaborative decision-making: systematic adaptation and open trial protocol for veterans with psychosis.

作者信息

Treichler Emily B H, Rabin Borsika A, Spaulding William D, Thomas Michael L, Salyers Michelle P, Granholm Eric L, Cohen Amy N, Light Gregory A

机构信息

VA Desert Pacific Mental Illness Research, Education, and Clinical Center (MIRECC), San Diego, CA, USA.

Department of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive 0804, La Jolla, CA, 92093, USA.

出版信息

Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Mar 29;7(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00820-4.

DOI:10.1186/s40814-021-00820-4
PMID:33781352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8005669/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Collaborative decision-making is an innovative decision-making approach that assigns equal power and responsibility to patients and providers. Most veterans with serious mental illnesses like schizophrenia want a greater role in treatment decisions, but there are no interventions targeted for this population. A skills-based intervention is promising because it is well-aligned with the recovery model, uses similar mechanisms as other evidence-based interventions in this population, and generalizes across decisional contexts while empowering veterans to decide when to initiate collaborative decision-making. Collaborative Decision Skills Training (CDST) was developed in a civilian serious mental illness sample and may fill this gap but needs to undergo a systematic adaptation process to ensure fit for veterans.

METHODS

In aim 1, the IM Adapt systematic process will be used to adapt CDST for veterans with serious mental illness. Veterans and Veteran's Affairs (VA) staff will join an Adaptation Resource Team and complete qualitative interviews to identify how elements of CDST or service delivery may need to be adapted to optimize its effectiveness or viability for veterans and the VA context. During aim 2, an open trial will be conducted with veterans in a VA Psychosocial Rehabilitation and Recovery Center (PRRC) to assess additional adaptations, feasibility, and initial evidence of effectiveness.

DISCUSSION

This study will be the first to evaluate a collaborative decision-making intervention among veterans with serious mental illness. It will also contribute to the field's understanding of perceptions of collaborative decision-making among veterans with serious mental illness and VA clinicians, and result in a service delivery manual that may be used to understand adaptation needs generally in VA PRRCs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04324944.

摘要

背景

共同决策是一种创新的决策方法,赋予患者和医疗服务提供者平等的权力和责任。大多数患有精神分裂症等严重精神疾病的退伍军人希望在治疗决策中发挥更大作用,但目前尚无针对这一人群的干预措施。基于技能的干预措施很有前景,因为它与康复模式高度契合,采用了与该人群其他循证干预措施类似的机制,并且可以在不同决策背景下推广,同时使退伍军人有能力决定何时启动共同决策。共同决策技能培训(CDST)是在患有严重精神疾病的普通人群样本中开发的,可能填补这一空白,但需要经过系统的调整过程以确保适用于退伍军人。

方法

在目标1中,将使用IM Adapt系统流程对患有严重精神疾病的退伍军人调整CDST。退伍军人和退伍军人事务部(VA)工作人员将加入一个调整资源团队,并完成定性访谈,以确定CDST的要素或服务提供方式可能需要如何调整,以优化其对退伍军人和VA环境的有效性或可行性。在目标2中,将在VA心理社会康复与恢复中心(PRRC)对退伍军人进行开放试验,以评估进一步的调整、可行性和有效性的初步证据。

讨论

本研究将首次评估针对患有严重精神疾病的退伍军人的共同决策干预措施。它还将有助于该领域了解患有严重精神疾病的退伍军人和VA临床医生对共同决策的看法,并产生一份服务提供手册,可用于总体了解VA PRRC中的调整需求。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT04324944。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0468/8006359/670384879126/40814_2021_820_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0468/8006359/8d9a9394635e/40814_2021_820_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0468/8006359/670384879126/40814_2021_820_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0468/8006359/8d9a9394635e/40814_2021_820_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0468/8006359/670384879126/40814_2021_820_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Skills-based intervention to enhance collaborative decision-making: systematic adaptation and open trial protocol for veterans with psychosis.基于技能的干预措施以增强共同决策:针对患有精神病的退伍军人的系统改编及开放试验方案
Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Mar 29;7(1):89. doi: 10.1186/s40814-021-00820-4.
2
Enhancing patient-clinician collaboration during treatment decision-making: study protocol for a community-engaged, mixed method hybrid type 1 trial of collaborative decision skills training (CDST) for veterans with psychosis.增强治疗决策过程中的医患协作:一项针对有精神病的退伍军人开展的以社区为基础的、混合方法的 1 型试验,以评估协作决策技能培训(CDST)对提高医患协作的效果的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jun 6;25(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08127-4.
3
Using a stakeholder-engaged, iterative, and systematic approach to adapting collaborative decision skills training for implementation in VA psychosocial rehabilitation and recovery centers.采用利益相关者参与、迭代和系统的方法,对协作决策技能培训进行改编,以便在退伍军人事务部心理康复和恢复中心实施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 17;22(1):1543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08833-2.
4
Multisite Agricultural Veterans Affairs Farming and Recovery Mental Health Services (VA FARMS) Pilot Program: Protocol for a Responsive Mixed Methods Evaluation Study.多地点退伍军人事务部农业与康复心理健康服务(VA FARMS)试点项目:一项响应式混合方法评估研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jan 6;12:e40496. doi: 10.2196/40496.
5
Collaborative decision skills training: Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a novel intervention.协作决策技能培训:一项新干预措施的可行性和初步结果。
Psychol Serv. 2020 Feb;17(1):54-64. doi: 10.1037/ser0000275. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
6
Effectiveness of Implementing a Collaborative Chronic Care Model for Clinician Teams on Patient Outcomes and Health Status in Mental Health: A Randomized Clinical Trial.实施临床医生团队协作式慢性病管理模式对改善精神卫生患者结局和健康状况的效果:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e190230. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0230.
7
Assessing fidelity of cognitive behavioral therapy in rural VA clinics: design of a randomized implementation effectiveness (hybrid type III) trial.评估美国退伍军人事务部农村诊所认知行为疗法的保真度:一项随机实施效果(混合型III)试验的设计
Implement Sci. 2016 May 10;11:65. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0432-4.
8
Psychometric examination of care quality measures in VA psychosocial rehabilitation and recovery centers (PRRCs).VA 心理社会康复和恢复中心(PRRC)的护理质量措施的心理计量学检验。
Psychol Serv. 2020 Aug;17(3):300-310. doi: 10.1037/ser0000357. Epub 2019 May 23.
9
Collaboration Leading to Addiction Treatment and Recovery from Other Stresses (CLARO): process of adapting collaborative care for co-occurring opioid use and mental disorders.合作治疗成瘾和应对其他压力导致的康复(CLARO):适应共病阿片类药物使用和精神障碍的协作护理的过程。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2022 Apr 8;17(1):25. doi: 10.1186/s13722-022-00302-9.
10
Supporting teams to optimize function and independence in Veterans: a multi-study program and mixed methods protocol.支持退伍军人优化功能和独立性的团队:一项多研究计划和混合方法方案。
Implement Sci. 2018 Apr 20;13(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0748-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Enhancing patient-clinician collaboration during treatment decision-making: study protocol for a community-engaged, mixed method hybrid type 1 trial of collaborative decision skills training (CDST) for veterans with psychosis.增强治疗决策过程中的医患协作:一项针对有精神病的退伍军人开展的以社区为基础的、混合方法的 1 型试验,以评估协作决策技能培训(CDST)对提高医患协作的效果的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jun 6;25(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08127-4.
2
Military culture and collaborative decision-making in mental healthcare: cultural, communication and policy considerations.军事文化与精神卫生保健中的协作决策:文化、沟通与政策考量
BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 14;9(5):e154. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.516.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Patients' and clinicians' perspectives on shared decision-making regarding treatment decisions for depression, anxiety disorders, and obsessive-compulsive disorder in specialized psychiatric care.患者和临床医生对精神科专科治疗抑郁、焦虑障碍和强迫症的治疗决策共享决策的看法。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;26(2):645-658. doi: 10.1111/jep.13285. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
2
The FRAME: an expanded framework for reporting adaptations and modifications to evidence-based interventions.FRAME:一个扩展的报告基于证据的干预措施的适应性和修改的框架。
Implement Sci. 2019 Jun 6;14(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0898-y.
3
Ideal and real treatment planning processes for people with serious mental illness in public mental health care.
Creating a Statistical Analysis Plan to Continually Evaluate Intervention Adaptations that Arise in Real-World Implementation.
制定统计分析计划,持续评估现实实施中出现的干预措施调整。
Prev Sci. 2023 Oct;24(7):1302-1313. doi: 10.1007/s11121-023-01513-5. Epub 2023 May 27.
4
Using a stakeholder-engaged, iterative, and systematic approach to adapting collaborative decision skills training for implementation in VA psychosocial rehabilitation and recovery centers.采用利益相关者参与、迭代和系统的方法,对协作决策技能培训进行改编,以便在退伍军人事务部心理康复和恢复中心实施。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Dec 17;22(1):1543. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08833-2.
5
Shared decision-making interventions for people with mental health conditions.心理健康问题患者的共同决策干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 11;11(11):CD007297. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007297.pub3.
严重精神障碍患者在公共精神卫生服务中的理想与现实治疗计划流程。
Psychol Serv. 2021 Feb;18(1):93-103. doi: 10.1037/ser0000361. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
Periodic reflections: a method of guided discussions for documenting implementation phenomena.周期性反思:一种记录实施现象的引导性讨论方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018 Nov 27;18(1):153. doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0610-y.
5
Collaborative decision skills training: Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a novel intervention.协作决策技能培训:一项新干预措施的可行性和初步结果。
Psychol Serv. 2020 Feb;17(1):54-64. doi: 10.1037/ser0000275. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
6
Systematic, Multimethod Assessment of Adaptations Across Four Diverse Health Systems Interventions.对四种不同卫生系统干预措施的适应性进行系统的多方法评估。
Front Public Health. 2018 Apr 9;6:102. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00102. eCollection 2018.
7
Effectiveness of the DECIDE Interventions on Shared Decision Making and Perceived Quality of Care in Behavioral Health With Multicultural Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.DECIDE 干预措施对行为健康领域具有多元文化患者的共享决策制定和感知护理质量的有效性:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 1;75(4):325-335. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4585.
8
Enhancing Mental and Physical Health of Women through Engagement and Retention (EMPOWER): a protocol for a program of research.通过参与和留用提高妇女的身心健康(EMPOWER):一项研究计划的方案。
Implement Sci. 2017 Nov 7;12(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0658-9.
9
Beyond shared decision-making: Collaboration in the age of recovery from serious mental illness.超越共同决策:严重精神疾病康复时代的协作。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2017;87(5):567-574. doi: 10.1037/ort0000256.
10
Correlates of observer-rated active involvement in psychiatric treatment visits.观察者评定的积极参与精神科治疗就诊的相关因素。
Psychiatry Res. 2017 Oct;256:384-390. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.086. Epub 2017 Jul 1.