• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

先天性膈疝一期修补术后患者营养结局的深入观察

Closer Look at the Nutritional Outcomes of Patients After Primary Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.

作者信息

Vu Lan T, McFarland Carrie, Bratton Barbara, Lee Hanmin

机构信息

*Division of Pediatric Surgery, University of California, San Francisco Medical Center †UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

出版信息

J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017 Aug;65(2):237-241. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001627.

DOI:10.1097/MPG.0000000000001627
PMID:28489671
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesize that the patients after primary repair of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) can have poor nutritional outcomes and plan to identify risk factors to further stratify these patients.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort of patients who had primary repair of CDH between 2000 and 2014 and had follow-up at our institution. Z scores (weight for age and weight for length) were calculated using the World Health Organization and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention growth standards.

RESULTS

For the 67 patients in the cohort, the median age at the time of repair was 3 days (interquartile range 2-5) and at the time of discharge was 20.5 days (interquartile range 16-30). Fifteen percent of the patients required supplemental tube feeding for inadequate oral intake and 69% required fortified feedings for inadequate growth at discharge (4 patients subsequently needed gastrostomy tube placement). The median z scores at discharge were -1.0 (-2.1 to -0.3) and -1.2 (-2.3 to -0.5) in weight for age and weight for length, respectively. The risk factors for low z scores included open repair and longer periods of postoperative intubation or hospitalization. The z scores were similar at 6 months of age compared to discharge, but then statistically improved at 12 months of age.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with primary repair of CDH are at risk for poor nutritional outcomes at the time of hospital discharge and require follow-up to ensure adequate growth. Patients at highest risk are those who had an open repair and had prolonged intubation or hospitalization.

摘要

目的

我们推测先天性膈疝(CDH)一期修补术后的患者营养结局较差,并计划确定风险因素以进一步对这些患者进行分层。

方法

对2000年至2014年间接受CDH一期修补并在我们机构进行随访的患者进行回顾性队列研究。使用世界卫生组织和疾病控制与预防中心的生长标准计算Z评分(年龄别体重和身长别体重)。

结果

该队列中的67例患者,修补时的中位年龄为3天(四分位间距2 - 5),出院时为20.5天(四分位间距16 - 30)。15%的患者因经口摄入量不足需要补充管饲,69%的患者因出院时生长不足需要强化喂养(4例患者随后需要放置胃造瘘管)。出院时年龄别体重和身长别体重的中位Z评分分别为-1.0(-2.1至-0.3)和-1.2(-2.3至-0.5)。Z评分低的风险因素包括开放修补以及术后插管或住院时间较长。与出院时相比,6个月龄时的Z评分相似,但在12个月龄时在统计学上有所改善。

结论

CDH一期修补术后的患者在出院时存在营养结局不良的风险,需要进行随访以确保足够的生长。风险最高的患者是那些接受开放修补且插管或住院时间延长的患者。

相似文献

1
Closer Look at the Nutritional Outcomes of Patients After Primary Repair of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.先天性膈疝一期修补术后患者营养结局的深入观察
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017 Aug;65(2):237-241. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001627.
2
Predicting Full Enteral Feeding in the Postoperative Period in Infants with Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.预测先天性膈疝患儿术后全肠内喂养情况
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Oct;27(5):431-436. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1597655. Epub 2017 Jan 12.
3
Tube Thoracostomy at the Time of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair: Reassessing the Risks and Benefits.先天性膈疝修补术同期行胸腔闭式引流术:重新评估风险与获益
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Mar;27(3):311-317. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0233. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
4
Thoracoscopic Versus Open Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Repair: Single Tertiary Center Review.胸腔镜与开放手术治疗先天性膈疝:单一三级中心回顾
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Nov;27(11):1209-1216. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0298. Epub 2017 Oct 4.
5
Growth Assessment and the Risk of Growth Retardation in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Long-Term Follow-Up Study from the Japanese Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Study Group.先天性膈疝的生长评估与生长发育迟缓风险:来自日本先天性膈疝研究组的一项长期随访研究
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Feb;26(1):60-6. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1566094. Epub 2015 Oct 28.
6
Nutritional outcomes in survivors of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH)-factors associated with growth at one year.先天性膈疝(CDH)幸存者的营养结局——与一岁时生长相关的因素
J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Jan;50(1):74-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.003. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
7
Outcomes for thoracoscopic versus open repair of small to moderate congenital diaphragmatic hernias.胸腔镜手术与开放手术修复中小先天性膈疝的疗效比较
J Pediatr Surg. 2018 Apr;53(4):635-639. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.09.010. Epub 2017 Sep 25.
8
A modern era comparison of right versus left sided congenital diaphragmatic hernia outcomes.现代时期右侧与左侧先天性膈疝结局的比较。
J Pediatr Surg. 2016 Sep;51(9):1409-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.05.001. Epub 2016 May 18.
9
Early Pre- and Postoperative Enteral Nutrition and Growth in Infants with Symptomatic Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia.症状性先天性膈疝婴儿的早期肠内营养及其对生长的影响。
Eur J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Dec;33(6):469-476. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-1767829. Epub 2023 Mar 16.
10
Requirement and Duration of Tube Feed Supplementation among Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Patients.先天性膈疝患者管饲补充的要求及持续时间
J Pediatr Surg. 2019 May;54(5):895-898. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2019.01.017. Epub 2019 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
A scoping review of the post-discharge care needs of babies requiring surgery in the first year of life.对出生后第一年需要手术的婴儿出院后护理需求的范围综述。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2023 Nov 22;3(11):e0002424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002424. eCollection 2023.
2
Long-Term Outcomes of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: Report of a Multicenter Study in Japan.先天性膈疝的长期预后:日本一项多中心研究报告
Children (Basel). 2022 Jun 8;9(6):856. doi: 10.3390/children9060856.
3
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia.先天性膈疝。
Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2022 Jun 1;8(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s41572-022-00362-w.
4
Characterizing Esophageal Motility in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Patients Using High Resolution Manometry.使用高分辨率测压法对新生儿重症监护病房患者的食管动力进行特征描述。
Front Pediatr. 2022 Feb 14;10:806072. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.806072. eCollection 2022.