Tétreau Raphael, Llacer Carmen, Riou Olivier, Deshayes Emmanuel
Medical Imaging Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute - Val d'Aurelle, 208 rue des Apothicaires, F-34298 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Radiotherapy Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute - Val d'Aurelle, 208 rue des Apothicaires, F-34298 Montpellier Cedex 5, France.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2017 Mar-Apr;22(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.rpor.2015.12.004. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has developed over the last few years for the treatment of primary and metastatic hepatic tumors. The tumoral and adjacent peritumoral modifications caused by this radiosurgery limit the evaluation of response by anatomic imaging and dimensional criteria alone, such as with RECIST. This suggests that it is of interest to also take into account the residual enhancement and hyper metabolism of these hepatic targets. We have reviewed the English language literature regarding the response of hepatic lesions treated by SBRT, and found that only seven articles were specifically concerned with this problem. The response of the hepatocellular carcinoma after SBRT has been studied specifically with multiphase enhanced CT-scan. Criteria set by the European Association of Study of the Liver better estimate response at each time point of follow up than RECIST does. Non-enhancement, reflecting tumor necrosis, is additionally an early indicator of response with extended response in time and a best non-enhancement percentage is observed at 12 months. The response after treatment by SBRT of cholangiocarcinoma has not yet generated a specific report. Use of RECIST criteria is also inadequate in the evaluation of response after SBRT for hepatic metastases. Response of liver metastases to SBRT is better assessed with a combination of size and enhancement pattern. The occurrence of a lobulated enhancement during follow up is efficient to predict local progression in a specific, reproducible, and sensitive way. Patients with FDG-avid hepatic metastases are also better evaluated with PET-CT and functional criteria than routine imaging and metric evaluation alone.
立体定向体部放射治疗(SBRT)在过去几年中得到了发展,用于治疗原发性和转移性肝肿瘤。这种放射外科手术引起的肿瘤及肿瘤周围邻近组织的改变,限制了仅通过解剖成像和尺寸标准(如RECIST)来评估反应。这表明,还应考虑这些肝脏靶区的残余强化和高代谢情况。我们回顾了关于SBRT治疗肝脏病变反应的英文文献,发现只有七篇文章专门涉及这个问题。肝细胞癌经SBRT治疗后的反应已通过多期增强CT扫描进行了专门研究。与RECIST相比,欧洲肝脏研究协会设定的标准能更好地估计随访各时间点的反应。反映肿瘤坏死的无强化,还是反应的早期指标,且反应持续时间延长,在12个月时观察到最佳无强化百分比。胆管癌经SBRT治疗后的反应尚未产生具体报告。在评估SBRT治疗肝转移后的反应时,使用RECIST标准也不充分。肝转移对SBRT的反应通过大小和强化模式相结合来评估更好。随访期间出现分叶状强化能够以一种特定、可重复且敏感的方式有效预测局部进展。与仅进行常规成像和指标评估相比,FDG摄取阳性的肝转移患者通过PET-CT和功能标准进行评估也更好。