Talbot Daniel, Van der Burg Erik, Cass John
School of Social Science and Psychology, Western Sydney University, Australia.
Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands; School of Psychology, University of Sydney, Australia.
Iperception. 2017 Apr 3;8(2):2041669517699222. doi: 10.1177/2041669517699222. eCollection 2017 Mar-Apr.
Recently, Cass and Van der Burg demonstrated that temporal order judgment (TOJ) precision could be profoundly impaired by the mere presence of dynamic visual clutter elsewhere in the visual field. This study examines whether presenting target and distractor objects in different depth planes might ameliorate this remote temporal camouflage (RTC) effect. TOJ thresholds were measured under static and dynamic (flickering) distractor conditions. In Experiment 1, targets were presented at zero, crossed, or uncrossed disparity, with distractors fixed at zero disparity. Thresholds were significantly elevated under dynamic compared with static contextual conditions, replicating the RTC effect. Crossed but not uncrossed disparity targets improved performance in dynamic distractor contexts, which otherwise produce substantial RTC. In Experiment 2, the assignment of disparity was reversed: targets fixed at zero disparity; distractors crossed, uncrossed, or zero. Under these conditions, thresholds improved significantly in the nonzero distractor disparity conditions. These results indicate that presenting target and distractor objects in different planes can significantly improve TOJ performance in dynamic conditions. In Experiment 3, targets were each presented with a different sign of disparity (e.g., one crossed and the other uncrossed), with no resulting performance benefits. Results suggest that disparity can be used to alleviate the performance-diminishing effects of RTC, but only if both targets constitute a single and unique disparity-defined surface.
最近,卡斯和范德伯格证明,仅仅是视野中其他地方存在动态视觉干扰物,就可能严重损害时间顺序判断(TOJ)的精度。本研究考察了在不同深度平面呈现目标和干扰物是否能改善这种远距离时间伪装(RTC)效应。在静态和动态(闪烁)干扰条件下测量了TOJ阈值。在实验1中,目标以零视差、交叉视差或非交叉视差呈现,干扰物固定在零视差。与静态背景条件相比,动态条件下阈值显著升高,重现了RTC效应。交叉视差而非非交叉视差目标在动态干扰背景下提高了性能,否则会产生显著的RTC。在实验2中,视差分配颠倒:目标固定在零视差;干扰物为交叉视差、非交叉视差或零视差。在这些条件下,非零干扰视差条件下阈值显著改善。这些结果表明,在不同平面呈现目标和干扰物可显著提高动态条件下的TOJ性能。在实验3中,每个目标呈现不同的视差符号(例如,一个交叉视差,另一个非交叉视差),但没有产生性能提升。结果表明,视差可用于减轻RTC对性能的降低影响,但前提是两个目标构成一个单一且独特的由视差定义的表面。