Camargo Gabriel Cordeiro, Rothstein Tamara, Derenne Maria Eduarda, Sabioni Leticia, Lima João A C, Lima Ronaldo de Souza Leão, Gottlieb Ilan
Casa de Saúde São José; Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Centro de Diagnóstico por Imagem CDPI, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2017 May;108(5):396-404. doi: 10.5935/abc.20170049. Epub 2017 May 4.
Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) allows for noninvasive coronary artery disease (CAD) phenotyping. Factors related to CAD progression are epidemiologically valuable.
To identify factors associated with CAD progression in patients undergoing sequential CCTA testing.
We retrospectively analyzed 384 consecutive patients who had at least two CCTA studies between December 2005 and March 2013. Due to limitations in the quantification of CAD progression, we excluded patients who had undergone surgical revascularization previously or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between studies. CAD progression was defined as any increase in the adapted segment stenosis score (calculated using the number of diseased segments and stenosis severity) in all coronary segments without stent (in-stent restenosis was excluded from the analysis). Stepwise logistic regression was used to assess variables associated with CAD progression.
From a final population of 234 patients, a total of 117 (50%) had CAD progression. In a model accounting for major CAD risk factors and other baseline characteristics, only age (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.01-1.07), interstudy interval (OR 1.03, 95%CI 1.01-1.04), and past PCI (OR 3.66, 95%CI 1.77-7.55) showed an independent relationship with CAD progression.
A history of PCI with stent placement was independently associated with a 3.7-fold increase in the odds of CAD progression, excluding in-stent restenosis. Age and interstudy interval were also independent predictors of progression.
冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)可实现无创性冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的表型分析。与CAD进展相关的因素在流行病学上具有重要价值。
确定接受序贯CCTA检查的患者中与CAD进展相关的因素。
我们回顾性分析了2005年12月至2013年3月期间连续进行至少两次CCTA检查的384例患者。由于CAD进展量化存在局限性,我们排除了此前接受过手术血运重建或在两次检查之间接受过经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的患者。CAD进展定义为所有无支架冠状动脉节段(分析中排除支架内再狭窄)的适应性节段狭窄评分(根据病变节段数量和狭窄严重程度计算)出现任何增加。采用逐步逻辑回归评估与CAD进展相关的变量。
在最终的234例患者群体中,共有117例(50%)出现CAD进展。在一个纳入主要CAD危险因素和其他基线特征的模型中,只有年龄(比值比[OR]1.04,95%置信区间[95%CI]1.01 - 1.07)、两次检查间隔时间(OR 1.03,95%CI 1.01 - 1.04)和既往PCI史(OR 3.66,95%CI 1.77 - 7.55)与CAD进展呈独立相关。
排除支架内再狭窄后,有支架置入的PCI史与CAD进展几率增加3.7倍独立相关。年龄和两次检查间隔时间也是进展的独立预测因素。