Bueno Mírian Galvão, Sousa Elen Juliana Bonassa de, Hotta Juliana, Porto Vinícius Carvalho, Urban Vanessa Migliorini, Neppelenbroek Karin Hermana
Department of Prosthodontics, Dental School of Bauru, USP - Universidade de São Paulo, Bauru, SP, Brazil.
Department of Dentistry, UEPG - Universidade Estadual de Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, PR, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2017 Jan-Apr;28(2):158-164. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201701266.
Evaluating the addition of minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of antifungals for Candida albicans biofilm on the hardness and roughness of temporary denture soft liners. Specimens (n=8; 36×7×6 mm) of tissue conditioner (Softone) and resilient liner (Trusoft) were produced either without (control) or with incorporation of drugs at MICs: nystatin (0.032 g/mL), chlorhexidine diacetate (0.064 g/mL), ketoconazole (0.128 g/mL), miconazole (0.256 g/mL) and itraconazole (0.256 g/mL). Specimens were stored in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h, 7 days and 14 days prior to the hardness/roughness measurements. Data were analyzed by 3-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD test (α=0.05). The addition of the antifungals into both materials demonstrated no evident hardness change or decrease of this property compared with the control, except for miconazole in Softone, which increased the hardness after 14 days (p=0.003). The addition of nystatin into both materials, chlorhexidine in Trusoft and ketoconazole in Softone resulted in no significant changes of roughness compared with the control, after 7 days and 14 days (p>0.05). In these periods, itraconazole increased the roughness of both materials (p<0.001). The addition of all antifungals, except for the miconazole in Softone, resulted in no deleterious effects on the materials' hardness over the evaluation time. The MICs of nystatin in both temporary soft lining materials, ketoconazole in Softone and chlorhexidine in Trusoft resulted in no deleterious effects for roughness up to 14 days.
评估抗真菌药物对白色念珠菌生物膜的最低抑菌浓度(MICs)添加到临时义齿软衬材料上对其硬度和粗糙度的影响。制备了组织调理剂(Softone)和弹性衬垫(Trusoft)的样本(n = 8;36×7×6 mm),分为不添加药物(对照)和添加MICs药物的组:制霉菌素(0.032 g/mL)、二醋酸氯己定(0.064 g/mL)、酮康唑(0.128 g/mL)、咪康唑(0.256 g/mL)和伊曲康唑(0.256 g/mL)。在进行硬度/粗糙度测量之前,将样本在37°C的蒸馏水中储存24小时、7天和14天。数据通过三因素方差分析和Tukey HSD检验进行分析(α = 0.05)。与对照组相比,在两种材料中添加抗真菌药物后,除了Softone中的咪康唑在14天后增加了硬度(p = 0.003)外,未显示出明显的硬度变化或该性能的降低。在7天和14天后,与对照组相比,在两种材料中添加制霉菌素、Trusoft中的氯己定和Softone中的酮康唑导致粗糙度无显著变化(p>0.05)。在这些时间段内,伊曲康唑增加了两种材料的粗糙度(p<0.001)。除了Softone中的咪康唑外,添加所有抗真菌药物在评估时间内对材料的硬度均无有害影响。在两种临时软衬材料中添加制霉菌素的MICs、Softone中的酮康唑和Trusoft中的氯己定在长达14天内对粗糙度均无有害影响。