From Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, St. Joseph's Health Care; the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences at Western; Victoria Hospital; and Byron Family Medical Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ann Intern Med. 2017 Jun 6;166(11):765-774. doi: 10.7326/M16-1131. Epub 2017 May 9.
Reducing inappropriate antibiotic prescribing for acute upper respiratory tract infections (AURIs) requires a better understanding of the factors associated with this practice.
To determine the prevalence of antibiotic prescribing for nonbacterial AURIs and whether prescribing rates varied by physician characteristics.
Retrospective analysis of linked administrative health care data.
Primary care physician practices in Ontario, Canada (January-December 2012).
Patients aged 66 years or older with nonbacterial AURIs. Patients with cancer or immunosuppressive conditions and residents of long-term care homes were excluded.
Antibiotic prescriptions for physician-diagnosed AURIs. A multivariable logistic regression model with generalized estimating equations was used to examine whether prescribing rates varied by physician characteristics, accounting for clustering of patients among physicians and adjusting for patient-level covariates.
The cohort included 8990 primary care physicians and 185 014 patients who presented with a nonbacterial AURI, including the common cold (53.4%), acute bronchitis (31.3%), acute sinusitis (13.6%), or acute laryngitis (1.6%). Forty-six percent of patients received an antibiotic prescription; most prescriptions were for broad-spectrum agents (69.9% [95% CI, 69.6% to 70.2%]). Patients were more likely to receive prescriptions from mid- and late-career physicians than early-career physicians (rate difference, 5.1 percentage points [CI, 3.9 to 6.4 percentage points] and 4.6 percentage points [CI, 3.3 to 5.8 percentage points], respectively), from physicians trained outside of Canada or the United States (3.6 percentage points [CI, 2.5 to 4.6 percentage points]), and from physicians who saw 25 to 44 patients per day or 45 or more patients per day than those who saw fewer than 25 patients per day (3.1 percentage points [CI, 2.1 to 4.0 percentage points] and 4.1 percentage points [CI, 2.7 to 5.5 percentage points], respectively).
Physician rationale for prescribing was unknown.
In this low-risk elderly cohort, 46% of patients with a nonbacterial AURI were prescribed antibiotics. Patients were more likely to receive prescriptions from mid- or late-career physicians with high patient volumes and from physicians who were trained outside of Canada or the United States.
Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care, Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, and Lawson Health Research Institute.
减少急性上呼吸道感染(AURI)的不合理抗生素处方需要更好地了解与该实践相关的因素。
确定非细菌性 AURI 抗生素处方的流行率,以及处方率是否因医生特征而异。
对链接的医疗保健管理数据进行回顾性分析。
加拿大安大略省的初级保健医生诊所(2012 年 1 月至 12 月)。
年龄在 66 岁或以上的非细菌性 AURI 患者。患有癌症或免疫抑制性疾病的患者和长期护理院的居民被排除在外。
医生诊断为 AURI 的抗生素处方。使用广义估计方程的多变量逻辑回归模型检查了处方率是否因医生特征而异,同时考虑了医生之间患者的聚类,并调整了患者水平的协变量。
该队列包括 8990 名初级保健医生和 185014 名出现非细菌性 AURI 的患者,包括普通感冒(53.4%)、急性支气管炎(31.3%)、急性鼻窦炎(13.6%)或急性喉炎(1.6%)。46%的患者接受了抗生素处方;大多数处方为广谱药物(69.9%[95%CI,69.6%至 70.2%])。与早期职业医生相比,患者更有可能从中期和晚期职业医生那里获得处方(差异率为 5.1 个百分点[CI,3.9 至 6.4 个百分点]和 4.6 个百分点[CI,3.3 至 5.8 个百分点]),从在加拿大或美国以外接受培训的医生(3.6 个百分点[CI,2.5 至 4.6 个百分点]),以及每天看 25 至 44 名患者或每天看 45 名或更多患者的医生,而不是每天看少于 25 名患者(差异率分别为 3.1 个百分点[CI,2.1 至 4.0 个百分点]和 4.1 个百分点[CI,2.7 至 5.5 个百分点])。
不知道医生开处方的理由。
在这个低风险的老年队列中,46%的非细菌性 AURI 患者被开了抗生素处方。患者更有可能从中期或晚期职业医生、高工作量医生和在加拿大或美国以外接受培训的医生那里获得处方。
安大略省卫生部和长期护理部、南安大略省学术医疗组织、西安大略大学舒立克医学院和牙科学院以及劳森健康研究所。