Yélamos Oriol, Hibler Brian P, Cordova Miguel, Hollmann Travis J, Kose Kivanc, Marchetti Michael A, Myskowski Patricia L, Pulitzer Melissa P, Rajadhyaksha Milind, Rossi Anthony M, Jain Manu
Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York2Dermatology Department, Hospital Clínic, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Dermatology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
JAMA Dermatol. 2017 Jul 1;153(7):689-693. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2017.0619.
Extramammary Paget disease (EMPD) is commonly refractory to surgical and nonsurgical therapies. Identifying recurrent or persistent EMPD is challenging because the disease is multifocal, and multiple blind scouting biopsies are usually performed in this setting. Handheld reflectance confocal microscopy (HRCM) has been used to diagnose and map primary EMPD and therefore may be used to identify EMPD recurrences.
To evaluate HRCM's diagnostic accuracy in the setting of recurrent or persistent EMPD as well as its potential diagnostic pitfalls.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This prospective case series study included patients referred to the Dermatology Service at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016, with biopsy-proven EMPD in whom HRCM was used to monitor treatment response. Five patients were included, and 22 sites clinically concerning for recurrent or persistent disease were evaluated using HRCM and histopathologic examination. In 2 patients, video mosaics were created to evaluate large areas.
Sensitivity and specificity of HRCM in identifying recurrent or persistent EMPD; causes for false-negative results according to their location, histopathologic findings, and previous treatments.
Of the 22 clinically suspicious sites evaluated in 5 patients (4 men, 1 woman; median [range] age, 70 [56-77] years), 9 (40.9%) were positive for recurrent disease on HRCM and histopathologically confirmed, and 13 (59.1%) sites were negative on HRCM, but 3 of the 13 were positive for EMPD on histopathological examination. In general, HRCM had a sensitivity of 75% and a specificity of 100% in identifying recurrent or persistent EMPD. False-negative results were found in 2 patients and occurred at the margins of EMPD, close to previous biopsy sites. Creating video mosaics (or video mosaicking) seemed to improve the detection of EMPD.
Handheld reflectance confocal microscopy is a useful auxiliary tool for diagnosing EMPD recurrences and can be used to guide scouting biopsies, thus reducing the number of biopsies needed to render a correct diagnosis.
乳腺外佩吉特病(EMPD)通常对手术和非手术治疗均具有难治性。识别复发性或持续性EMPD具有挑战性,因为该疾病呈多灶性,在此情况下通常需要进行多次盲目探查活检。手持式反射共聚焦显微镜(HRCM)已被用于诊断和描绘原发性EMPD,因此也可用于识别EMPD复发。
评估HRCM在复发性或持续性EMPD情况下的诊断准确性及其潜在的诊断陷阱。
设计、设置和参与者:这项前瞻性病例系列研究纳入了2014年1月1日至2016年12月31日期间转诊至纪念斯隆凯特琳癌症中心皮肤科的患者,这些患者经活检证实患有EMPD,并使用HRCM监测治疗反应。共纳入5例患者,对22个临床上怀疑有复发性或持续性疾病的部位进行了HRCM和组织病理学检查评估。在2例患者中,创建了视频拼图以评估大面积区域。
HRCM识别复发性或持续性EMPD的敏感性和特异性;根据其位置、组织病理学发现和既往治疗情况分析假阴性结果的原因。
在5例患者(4例男性,1例女性;年龄中位数[范围]为70[56 - 77]岁)中评估的22个临床可疑部位,9个(40.9%)经HRCM检查呈复发性疾病阳性且经组织病理学证实,13个(59.1%)部位HRCM检查为阴性,但其中13个部位中有3个经组织病理学检查为EMPD阳性。总体而言,HRCM在识别复发性或持续性EMPD方面的敏感性为75%,特异性为100%。在2例患者中发现了假阴性结果,均出现在EMPD边缘,靠近先前的活检部位。创建视频拼图(或视频拼接)似乎可提高EMPD的检测率。
手持式反射共聚焦显微镜是诊断EMPD复发的有用辅助工具,可用于指导探查活检,从而减少做出正确诊断所需的活检次数。