• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面容的恐惧与愤怒:面宽高比影响对愤怒和恐惧表情的识别。

The face of fear and anger: Facial width-to-height ratio biases recognition of angry and fearful expressions.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Miami University.

出版信息

Emotion. 2018 Apr;18(3):453-464. doi: 10.1037/emo0000328. Epub 2017 May 11.

DOI:10.1037/emo0000328
PMID:28493748
Abstract

The ability to rapidly and accurately decode facial expressions is adaptive for human sociality. Although judgments of emotion are primarily determined by musculature, static face structure can also impact emotion judgments. The current work investigates how (fWHR), a stable feature of all faces, influences perceivers' judgments of expressive displays of anger and fear (Studies 1a, 1b, & 2), and anger and happiness (Study 3). Across 4 studies, we provide evidence consistent with the hypothesis that perceivers more readily see anger on faces with high fWHR compared with those with low fWHR, which instead facilitates the recognition of fear and happiness. This bias emerges when participants are led to believe that targets displaying otherwise neutral faces are attempting to mask an emotion (Studies 1a & 1b), and is evident when faces display an emotion (Studies 2 & 3). Together, these studies suggest that target facial width-to-height ratio biases ascriptions of emotion with consequences for emotion recognition speed and accuracy. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

快速而准确地解读面部表情的能力是人类社交能力的适应性体现。尽管情绪判断主要取决于肌肉活动,但静态的面部结构也会影响情绪判断。目前的研究调查了(fWHR),即所有面孔的稳定特征,如何影响观察者对愤怒和恐惧(研究 1a、1b 和 2)以及愤怒和幸福(研究 3)的表情表达的判断。在 4 项研究中,我们提供的证据与假设一致,即与低 fWHR 相比,观察者更容易在高 fWHR 的面孔上看到愤怒,而这更有利于识别恐惧和幸福。当参与者被引导相信,表现出其他中性表情的目标正在试图掩饰某种情绪时(研究 1a 和 1b),这种偏见就会出现,而当面孔表现出某种情绪时(研究 2 和 3),这种偏见就会显现出来。这些研究表明,目标的面部宽高比偏差会影响对情绪的归因,从而影响情绪识别的速度和准确性。

相似文献

1
The face of fear and anger: Facial width-to-height ratio biases recognition of angry and fearful expressions.面容的恐惧与愤怒:面宽高比影响对愤怒和恐惧表情的识别。
Emotion. 2018 Apr;18(3):453-464. doi: 10.1037/emo0000328. Epub 2017 May 11.
2
Effects of affective and emotional congruency on facial expression processing under different task demands.在不同任务需求下,情感和情绪一致性对面部表情加工的影响。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Jun;187:66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 May 8.
3
Face gender and emotion expression: are angry women more like men?面部的性别与情感表达:愤怒的女性是否更像男性?
J Vis. 2009 Nov 24;9(12):19.1-8. doi: 10.1167/9.12.19.
4
Seeing happy emotion in fearful and angry faces: qualitative analysis of facial expression recognition in a bilateral amygdala-damaged patient.在恐惧和愤怒的面孔中识别出快乐情绪:对一名双侧杏仁核损伤患者面部表情识别的定性分析。
Cortex. 2002 Dec;38(5):727-42. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70040-6.
5
Detecting and categorizing fleeting emotions in faces.检测和分类面部的短暂情绪。
Emotion. 2013 Feb;13(1):76-91. doi: 10.1037/a0029193. Epub 2012 Aug 6.
6
The Odor Context Facilitates the Perception of Low-Intensity Facial Expressions of Emotion.气味背景有助于对低强度面部情绪表情的感知。
PLoS One. 2015 Sep 21;10(9):e0138656. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0138656. eCollection 2015.
7
Categorical perception of facial expressions in individuals with non-clinical social anxiety.非临床社交焦虑个体对面部表情的分类感知。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2018 Mar;58:78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2017.09.001. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
8
The influence of subtle facial expressions on children's first impressions of trustworthiness and dominance is not adult-like.微妙的面部表情对儿童的可信度和支配力第一印象的影响不像成年人那样。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2019 Apr;180:19-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2018.12.002. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
9
Is fear in your head? A comparison of instructed and real-life expressions of emotion in the face and body.恐惧存在于你的脑海中吗?面部和身体上情感的指示性表达与现实生活表达的比较。
Emotion. 2017 Apr;17(3):557-565. doi: 10.1037/emo0000252. Epub 2016 Dec 8.
10
Face masks impair facial emotion recognition and induce specific emotion confusions.口罩会影响面部情绪识别,并导致特定的情绪混淆。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Sep 5;7(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00430-5.

引用本文的文献

1
Smile variation leaks personality and increases the accuracy of interpersonal judgments.微笑变化会泄露个性并提高人际判断的准确性。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Aug 22;3(9):pgae343. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae343. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
When he smiles: Attractiveness preferences for male faces expressing emotions.当他微笑时:对表达情感的男性面孔的吸引力偏好。
Evol Hum Sci. 2023 Nov 14;5:e31. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2023.28. eCollection 2023.
3
Tracking sexual dimorphism of facial width-to-height ratio across the lifespan: implications for perceived aggressiveness.
追踪面部宽高比在整个生命周期中的性别差异:对感知到的攻击性的影响。
R Soc Open Sci. 2022 May 4;9(5):211500. doi: 10.1098/rsos.211500. eCollection 2022 May.
4
Was facial width-to-height ratio subject to sexual selection pressures? A life course approach.面部宽高比是否受到性选择压力的影响?一种生命历程的方法。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 12;16(3):e0240284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240284. eCollection 2021.
5
Training away face-type bias: perception and decisions about emotional expression in stereotypically Black faces.消除面孔类型偏见的训练:对典型黑人面孔的情绪表达的感知和判断。
Psychol Res. 2021 Oct;85(7):2727-2741. doi: 10.1007/s00426-020-01420-2. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
6
Not Only Top-Down: The Dual-Processing of Gender-Emotion Stereotypes.不仅是自上而下:性别-情感刻板印象的双重加工
Front Psychol. 2020 May 26;11:1042. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01042. eCollection 2020.
7
When a face type is perceived as threatening: Using general recognition theory to understand biased categorization of Afrocentric faces.当一种面孔类型被视为具有威胁性时:运用通用识别理论理解对非裔中心面孔的有偏差的分类。
Mem Cognit. 2018 Jul;46(5):716-728. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0801-0.
8
Group Facial Width-to-Height Ratio Predicts Intergroup Negotiation Outcomes.群体面部宽高比可预测群体间谈判结果。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 21;9:214. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00214. eCollection 2018.
9
Using knowledge from human research to improve understanding of contest theory and contest dynamics.利用人类研究的知识来增进对竞争理论和竞争动态的理解。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Dec 20;284(1869). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2017.2182.