Suppr超能文献

危重症患者中二氧化碳驱动的气管导管套囊控制:一项随机对照研究。

CO2 driven endotracheal tube cuff control in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled study.

作者信息

De Pascale Gennaro, Pennisi Mariano Alberto, Vallecoccia Maria Sole, Bello Giuseppe, Maviglia Riccardo, Montini Luca, Di Gravio Valentina, Cutuli Salvatore Lucio, Conti Giorgio, Antonelli Massimo

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Sacro Cuore Catholic University, A. Gemelli Hospital, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0175476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175476. eCollection 2017.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To determine the safety and clinical efficacy of an innovative integrated airway system (AnapnoGuard™ 100 system) that continuously monitors and controls the cuff pressure (Pcuff), while facilitating the aspiration of subglottic secretions (SS).

METHODS

This was a prospective, single centre, open-label, randomized, controlled feasibility and safety trial. The primary endpoint of the study was the rate of device related adverse events (AE) and serious AE (SAE) as a result of using AnapnoGuard (AG) 100 during mechanical ventilation. Secondary endpoints were: (1) mechanical complications rate (2) ICU staff satisfaction; (3) VAP occurrence; (4) length of mechanical ventilation; (5) length of Intensive Care Unit stay and mortality; (6) volume of evacuated subglottic secretions. Sixty patients were randomized to be intubated with the AG endotracheal-tube (ETT) and connected to the AG 100 system allowing Pcuff adjustment and SS aspiration; or with an ETT combined with SS drainage and Pcuff controlled manually.

RESULTS

No difference in adverse events rate was identified between the groups. The use of AG system was associated with a significantly higher incidence of Pcuff determinations in the safety range (97.3% vs. 71%; p<0.01) and a trend to a greater volume of aspirated SS secretions: (192.0[64-413] ml vs. 150[50-200], p = 0.19 (total)); (57.8[20-88.7] ml vs. 50[18.7-62] ml, p = 0.11 (daily)). No inter-group difference was detected using AG system vs. controls in terms of post-extubation throat pain level (0 [0-2] vs. 0 [0-3]; p = 0.7), hoarseness (42.9% vs. 75%; p = 0.55) and tracheal mucosa oedema (16.7% vs. 10%; p = 0.65). Patients enrolled in the AG group had a trend to reduced VAP risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia(VAP) (14.8% vs. 40%; p = 0.06), which were more frequently monomicrobial (25% vs. 70%; p = 0.03). No statistically significant difference was observed in duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU stay, and mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The use AG 100 system and AG tube in critically ill intubated patients is safe and effective in Pcuff control and SS drainage. Its protective role against VAP needs to be confirmed in a larger randomized trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01550978. Date of registration: February 21, 2012.

摘要

背景

确定一种创新的集成气道系统(AnapnoGuard™ 100系统)的安全性和临床疗效,该系统可连续监测和控制套囊压力(Pcuff),同时便于吸引声门下分泌物(SS)。

方法

这是一项前瞻性、单中心、开放标签、随机对照的可行性和安全性试验。该研究的主要终点是在机械通气期间使用AnapnoGuard(AG)100导致的与设备相关的不良事件(AE)和严重不良事件(SAE)发生率。次要终点包括:(1)机械并发症发生率;(2)重症监护病房(ICU)工作人员满意度;(3)呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的发生情况;(4)机械通气时间;(5)ICU住院时间和死亡率;(6)吸出的声门下分泌物量。60例患者被随机分组,分别使用AG气管内导管(ETT)并连接到AG 100系统以允许调整Pcuff和吸引SS,或使用结合了SS引流和手动控制Pcuff的ETT。

结果

两组之间在不良事件发生率上未发现差异。使用AG系统与安全范围内Pcuff测定的发生率显著更高相关(97.3%对71%;p<0.01),并且吸出的SS分泌物量有增加的趋势:(总量:192.0[64 - 413]毫升对150[50 - 200]毫升,p = 0.19);(每日:57.8[20 - 88.7]毫升对50[18.7 - 62]毫升,p = 0.11)。在拔管后咽痛水平(0[0 - 2]对0[0 - 3];p = 0.7)、声音嘶哑(42.9%对75%;p = 0.55)和气管黏膜水肿(16.7%对10%;p = 0.65)方面,AG系统与对照组之间未检测到组间差异。AG组患者有降低VAP风险的趋势(14.8%对40%;p = 0.06),且VAP更常为单一微生物感染(25%对70%;p = 0.03)。在机械通气时间、ICU住院时间和死亡率方面未观察到统计学显著差异。

结论

在重症插管患者中使用AG 100系统和AG导管在控制Pcuff和引流SS方面是安全有效的。其对VAP的保护作用需要在更大规模的随机试验中得到证实。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01550978。注册日期:2012年2月21日。

相似文献

1
CO2 driven endotracheal tube cuff control in critically ill patients: A randomized controlled study.
PLoS One. 2017 May 11;12(5):e0175476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175476. eCollection 2017.
2
[Analysis on risk factors of endotracheal cuff under inflation in mechanically ventilated patients].
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Dec;26(12):870-4. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.12.005.
6
Oral hygiene care for critically ill patients to prevent ventilator-associated pneumonia.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Aug 13(8):CD008367. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008367.pub2.
8
Tracheal Tube Design and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.
Respir Care. 2017 Oct;62(10):1316-1323. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05492. Epub 2017 Jul 18.

本文引用的文献

1
Microbiome, biofilms, and pneumonia in the ICU.
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2016 Apr;29(2):160-6. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000255.
2
Subglottic Secretion Drainage and Objective Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Crit Care Med. 2016 Apr;44(4):830-40. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001414.
3
Continuous control of tracheal cuff pressure for VAP prevention: a collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data.
Ann Intensive Care. 2015 Dec;5(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13613-015-0087-3. Epub 2015 Nov 24.
4
Procedural Considerations on the Use of Polyurethane and/or Conical Cuffs.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Sep 1;192(5):639-40. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201502-0236le.
5
Randomized intubation with polyurethane or conical cuffs to prevent pneumonia in ventilated patients.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar 15;191(6):637-45. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201408-1398OC.
6
Endotracheal tubes cuff pressure control: does the CO2 matter?
Minerva Anestesiol. 2015 Mar;81(3):352-3. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
7
Detection of endobronchial intubation by monitoring the CO2 level above the endotracheal cuff.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2015 Feb;29(1):19-23. doi: 10.1007/s10877-014-9583-5. Epub 2014 May 29.
9
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012.
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
10
Continuous control of tracheal cuff pressure and microaspiration of gastric contents in critically ill patients.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Nov 1;184(9):1041-7. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201104-0630OC.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验