Centro de Investigación en Contaminación Ambiental (CICA), Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San José, Costa Rica.
Centro de Investigación en Contaminación Ambiental (CICA), Universidad de Costa Rica, 2060 San José, Costa Rica.
Chemosphere. 2017 Sep;182:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2017.04.147. Epub 2017 Apr 29.
Biopurification systems constitute a biological approach for the treatment of pesticide-containing wastewaters produced in agricultural activities, and contain an active core called biomixture. This work evaluated the performance of a biomixture to remove and detoxify a combination of three triazine herbicides (atrazine/terbuthylazine/terbutryn) and one insecticide (chlorpyrifos), and this efficiency was compared with dissipation in soil alone. The potential enhancement of the process was also assayed by bioaugmentation with the ligninolytic fungi Trametes versicolor. Globally, the non-bioaugmented biomixture exhibited faster pesticide removal than soil, but only in the first stages of the treatment. After 20 d, the largest pesticide removal was achieved in the biomixture, while significant removal was detected only for chlorpyrifos in soil. However, after 60 d the removal values in soil matched those achieved in the biomixture for all the pesticides. The bioaugmentation failed to enhance, and even significantly decreased the biomixture removal capacity. Final removal values were 82.8% (non-bioaugmented biomixture), 43.8% (fungal bioaugmented biomixture), and 84.7% (soil). The ecotoxicological analysis revealed rapid detoxification (from 100 to 170 TU to <1 TU in 20 d) towards Daphnia magna in the biomixture and soil, and slower in the bioaugmented biomixture, coinciding with pesticide removal. On the contrary, despite important herbicide elimination, no clear detoxification patterns were observed in the phytotoxicity towards Lactuca sativa. Findings suggest that the proposed biomixture is useful for fast removal of the target pesticides; even though soil also removes the agrochemicals, longer periods would be required. On the other hand, the use of fungal bioaugmentation is discouraged in this matrix.
生物净化系统是一种用于处理农业活动产生的含农药废水的生物方法,其中包含一种称为生物混合物的活性核心。本工作评估了生物混合物去除和解毒三种三嗪类除草剂(莠去津/特丁津/特丁净)和一种杀虫剂(毒死蜱)混合物的性能,并将其与单独在土壤中的消解进行了比较。还通过添加木质素分解真菌彩绒革盖菌进行生物增强来检测该过程的潜在增强效果。总体而言,未经生物增强的生物混合物比土壤更快地去除农药,但仅在前处理阶段如此。在 20 天后,生物混合物中达到了最大的农药去除率,而在土壤中仅检测到显著去除了毒死蜱。然而,在 60 天后,土壤中的去除值与生物混合物中的去除值相匹配,所有农药均如此。生物增强不仅未能增强生物混合物的去除能力,甚至显著降低了其去除能力。最终的去除值分别为 82.8%(未经生物增强的生物混合物)、43.8%(真菌生物增强的生物混合物)和 84.7%(土壤)。生态毒理学分析表明,在生物混合物和土壤中,快速对大型溞(Daphnia magna)进行解毒(在 20 天内从 100 到 170 TU 降至<1 TU),而在生物增强的生物混合物中较慢,这与农药去除相吻合。相反,尽管重要的除草剂被消除,但在对莴苣(Lactuca sativa)的植物毒性方面没有观察到明显的解毒模式。研究结果表明,所提出的生物混合物可用于快速去除目标农药;尽管土壤也可以去除农用化学品,但需要更长的时间。另一方面,在这种基质中不鼓励使用真菌生物增强。