• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1094例晚期乳腺癌患者骨转移的治疗及模式——德国肿瘤登记处乳腺癌前瞻性队列研究结果

Treatment and pattern of bone metastases in 1094 patients with advanced breast cancer - Results from the prospective German Tumour Registry Breast Cancer cohort study.

作者信息

Schröder Jan, Fietz Thomas, Köhler Andreas, Petersen Volker, Tesch Hans, Spring Lisa, Fleitz Annette, Jänicke Martina, Marschner Norbert

机构信息

Centre for Haematology and Oncology, Kettwiger Str. 62, 45468 Mülheim, Germany.

Centre for Internal Medicine, Haematology and Oncology, Virchowstr. 10c, 78224 Singen, Germany.

出版信息

Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jul;79:139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 May 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.031
PMID:28494404
Abstract

A high proportion of patients with breast cancer develop bone metastases, yet data on routine treatment with bone-targeted agents (BTA) are rare. We report real-life outcome data of patients with breast cancer metastasised to the bone treated by office-based oncologists in Germany. The ongoing, prospective, multicentre, population-based cohort study Tumour Registry Breast Cancer (TMK) was started in 2007 in 140 centres across Germany. This interim analysis of 1094 patients with bone metastases revealed differences among the tumour subtypes: at start of first-line therapy, 36% of the patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive and only 20% of the patients with HR-negative tumours presented with bone-only metastasis. The majority of patients with bone metastases (89%, n = 976) received BTA therapy. In 2014-2015, 37% of the patients received the bisphosphonate zoledronic acid and 36% the antibody denosumab. Median duration of BTA therapy was 20 months (interquartile range 31.5 months), starting a median of 3 weeks after diagnosis of bone metastases, and ending a median of 7 weeks before death. The median overall survival (OS) also varied among the types of metastasis at start of first-line therapy ranging from 54 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 37.6-70.8), 38 months (95% CI 29.4-44.2) to 28 months (95% CI 24.2-31.0) for patients with bone-only metastases, non-visceral with or without bone metastases and visceral with or without bone metastases respectively. We show that choice and duration of BTA therapies are in conformity with guidelines applicable in Germany. To our knowledge, this is the first presentation of data on incidence, metastatic pattern, treatment and survival of patients with bone metastases in routine practice.

摘要

很大比例的乳腺癌患者会发生骨转移,但关于骨靶向药物(BTA)常规治疗的数据却很少。我们报告了德国办公室肿瘤医生治疗的骨转移乳腺癌患者的真实预后数据。正在进行的、前瞻性、多中心、基于人群的队列研究“肿瘤登记乳腺癌(TMK)”于2007年在德国140个中心启动。对1094例骨转移患者的中期分析揭示了肿瘤亚型之间的差异:在一线治疗开始时,激素受体(HR)阳性患者中有36%、HR阴性肿瘤患者中只有20%表现为仅骨转移。大多数骨转移患者(89%,n = 976)接受了BTA治疗。在2014 - 2015年,37%的患者接受了双膦酸盐唑来膦酸治疗,36%的患者接受了抗体地诺单抗治疗。BTA治疗的中位持续时间为20个月(四分位间距31.5个月),在骨转移诊断后中位3周开始,在死亡前中位7周结束。一线治疗开始时,不同转移类型的中位总生存期(OS)也有所不同,仅骨转移患者、非内脏有或无骨转移患者以及内脏有或无骨转移患者的中位总生存期分别为54个月(95%置信区间[CI] 37.6 - 70.8)、38个月(95% CI 29.4 - 44.2)和28个月(95% CI 24.2 - 31.0)。我们表明,BTA治疗的选择和持续时间符合德国适用的指南。据我们所知,这是首次展示常规实践中骨转移患者的发病率、转移模式、治疗和生存数据。

相似文献

1
Treatment and pattern of bone metastases in 1094 patients with advanced breast cancer - Results from the prospective German Tumour Registry Breast Cancer cohort study.1094例晚期乳腺癌患者骨转移的治疗及模式——德国肿瘤登记处乳腺癌前瞻性队列研究结果
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jul;79:139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 May 8.
2
Palliative systemic therapy and overall survival of 1,395 patients with advanced breast cancer - Results from the prospective German TMK cohort study.1395例晚期乳腺癌患者的姑息性全身治疗与总生存期——德国前瞻性TMK队列研究结果
Breast. 2017 Aug;34:122-130. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.05.014. Epub 2017 Jun 3.
3
Meta-analysis comparing denosumab and zoledronic acid for treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced solid tumours.比较地诺单抗和唑来膦酸治疗晚期实体瘤患者骨转移的荟萃分析。
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017 Nov;26(6). doi: 10.1111/ecc.12541. Epub 2016 Jul 19.
4
Overall survival improvement in patients with lung cancer and bone metastases treated with denosumab versus zoledronic acid: subgroup analysis from a randomized phase 3 study.在随机 3 期研究中,与唑来膦酸相比,地舒单抗治疗肺癌和骨转移患者的总生存期得到改善:亚组分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2012 Dec;7(12):1823-1829. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31826aec2b.
5
Different patterns of change in bone turnover markers during treatment with bone-modifying agents for breast cancer patients with bone metastases.乳腺癌骨转移患者使用骨修饰剂治疗期间骨转换标志物的不同变化模式。
Breast Cancer. 2017 Mar;24(2):245-253. doi: 10.1007/s12282-016-0695-2. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
6
Pain and health-related quality of life in patients with advanced solid tumours and bone metastases: integrated results from three randomized, double-blind studies of denosumab and zoledronic acid.晚期实体瘤和骨转移患者的疼痛和健康相关生活质量:地舒单抗和唑来膦酸三项随机、双盲研究的综合结果。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Dec;21(12):3497-507. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-1932-2. Epub 2013 Aug 22.
7
Impact of denosumab use on the survival of untreated non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients with bone metastases.地诺单抗使用对未经治疗的非鳞状非小细胞肺癌骨转移患者生存的影响。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun;143(6):1075-1082. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2350-5. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
8
Bone targeted therapies in advanced breast cancer.晚期乳腺癌的骨靶向治疗
Swiss Med Wkly. 2017 Jun 23;147:w14440. doi: 10.4414/smw.2017.14440. eCollection 2017 Jul 11.
9
Uptake of bone-modifying agents in patients with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer with bone metastases - prospective data from a multi-site Australian registry.曲妥珠单抗联合紫杉类药物治疗 HER2 阳性转移性乳腺癌的疗效及安全性:一项多中心回顾性研究
Intern Med J. 2022 Oct;52(10):1707-1716. doi: 10.1111/imj.15376. Epub 2022 May 24.
10
Randomized, double-blind study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced cancer (excluding breast and prostate cancer) or multiple myeloma.随机、双盲研究地舒单抗与唑来膦酸治疗晚期癌症(不包括乳腺癌和前列腺癌)或多发性骨髓瘤患者的骨转移。
J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1125-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.3304. Epub 2011 Feb 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of efficacy and safety of a proposed biosimilar QL1206 with reference denosumab in patients with bone metastasis from breast cancer: A subgroup analysis of a randomized, double-blinded phase III study.拟用生物类似药QL1206与对照药地诺单抗治疗乳腺癌骨转移患者的疗效和安全性比较:一项随机双盲III期研究的亚组分析
Chin J Cancer Res. 2025 Jun 30;37(3):337-351. doi: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2025.03.04.
2
Factors Associating with Bone-Only Metastasis in Chinese Breast Cancer Patients in the Absence of Anti-Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Targeted Therapy.在未接受抗人表皮生长因子受体2靶向治疗的中国乳腺癌患者中与仅骨转移相关的因素
Oncol Res Treat. 2025;48(3):112-124. doi: 10.1159/000543137. Epub 2024 Dec 16.
3
A Retrospective Analysis of Denosumab for the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Chinese Patients With Breast Cancer.
地诺单抗治疗中国乳腺癌患者骨转移的回顾性分析
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2023 Jul 10;17:11795549231182266. doi: 10.1177/11795549231182266. eCollection 2023.
4
Survival analysis and prognosis of patients with breast cancer with pleural metastasis.伴有胸膜转移的乳腺癌患者的生存分析与预后
Front Oncol. 2023 May 1;13:1104246. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1104246. eCollection 2023.
5
Assessment of bone-targeting agents use in patients with bone metastasis from breast, lung or prostate cancer using structured and unstructured electronic health records from a regional UK-based hospital.评估英国某地区医院基于结构化和非结构化电子健康记录的乳腺癌、肺癌或前列腺癌骨转移患者的骨靶向药物使用情况。
BMJ Open. 2023 May 8;13(5):e069214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069214.
6
TOR1B: a predictor of bone metastasis in breast cancer patients.TOR1B:乳腺癌患者骨转移的预测因子。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jan 27;13(1):1495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-28140-y.
7
Early economic modeling of magnetic resonance image-guided high intensity focused ultrasound compared to radiotherapy for pain palliation of bone metastases.与放射治疗相比,磁共振成像引导下的高强度聚焦超声用于骨转移瘤疼痛缓解的早期经济学模型分析
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 23;12:987546. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.987546. eCollection 2022.
8
Medication adherence with denosumab in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors treated in routine clinical settings: a retrospective study.在常规临床环境中治疗的实体瘤骨转移患者中使用地舒单抗的药物依从性:一项回顾性研究。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Nov;30(11):9267-9278. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07333-7. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
9
Real-world patient-reported outcomes of breast cancer or prostate cancer patients receiving antiresorptive therapy for bone metastases: Final results of the PROBone registry study.接受抗骨吸收治疗的乳腺癌或前列腺癌骨转移患者的真实世界患者报告结局:PROBone注册研究的最终结果
J Bone Oncol. 2022 Mar 3;33:100420. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100420. eCollection 2022 Apr.
10
Metastatic Pattern Discriminates Survival Benefit of Type of Surgery in Patients With Stage IV Breast Cancer Based on SEER Database.基于监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER)数据库,转移模式可区分IV期乳腺癌患者手术类型的生存获益。
Front Surg. 2021 Nov 3;8:696628. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.696628. eCollection 2021.