• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地诺单抗治疗中国乳腺癌患者骨转移的回顾性分析

A Retrospective Analysis of Denosumab for the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Chinese Patients With Breast Cancer.

作者信息

Li Wei, Wu Xinyu, Yu Heng, Zhu Zekai, Li Wenjie, Huang Xiang

机构信息

Department of Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Department of Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2023 Jul 10;17:11795549231182266. doi: 10.1177/11795549231182266. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1177/11795549231182266
PMID:37448470
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10336762/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Denosumab entered the Chinese market for the first time in 2020. Since it is a short period of time, there is a lack of data on its effectiveness and safety in Chinese people. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of denosumab in delaying skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with breast cancer metastatic to bone.

METHODS

The study retrospectively analyzed data from breast cancer patients with bone metastases (BM) who were treated with denosumab in the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from September 2020 to January 2022. The primary endpoint was SRE incidence at 1 year after receiving denosumab treatment. The secondary endpoints included time to first on-study SRE and safety. Descriptive analysis was utilized to display clinicopathological features. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median time to first on-study SRE in total population and subgroups. Logistic regression analysis and χ test were employed to determine the potential factors influencing the occurrence of SREs.

RESULTS

Fifty breast cancer patients with BM were enrolled in our study, and 54.0% of the patients had 5 or more metastatic bone lesions. After a median follow-up of 17.00 months, 24% of the patients developed SREs at 1 year after receiving denosumab treatment, and the median time to first on-study SREs was not reached. Five or more metastatic bone lesions were an independent risk factor for SRE occurrence (odds ratio = 6.06, 95% CI: 1.09-33.54,  = .039). The adverse events (AEs) associated with denosumab mainly included hypocalcemia (68.0%), periodontitis (28.0%), and myalgia (14.0%). Only 3 cases of grade III/IV AEs were reported, and no serious AEs occurred.

CONCLUSION

Denosumab was effective and well tolerated in Chinese breast cancer patients with BM.

摘要

背景

地诺单抗于2020年首次进入中国市场。由于时间较短,缺乏其在中国人群中的有效性和安全性数据。本研究的目的是评估地诺单抗在延迟骨转移乳腺癌患者骨骼相关事件(SREs)方面的有效性和安全性。

方法

本研究回顾性分析了2020年9月至2022年1月在南京医科大学第一附属医院接受地诺单抗治疗的骨转移乳腺癌患者的数据。主要终点是接受地诺单抗治疗1年后的SRE发生率。次要终点包括首次出现研究中SRE的时间和安全性。采用描述性分析展示临床病理特征。采用Kaplan-Meier方法估计总体人群和亚组中首次出现研究中SRE的中位时间。采用逻辑回归分析和χ检验确定影响SRE发生的潜在因素。

结果

本研究纳入了50例骨转移乳腺癌患者,54.0%的患者有5个或更多的骨转移病灶。中位随访17.00个月后,24%的患者在接受地诺单抗治疗1年后发生了SREs,且未达到首次出现研究中SREs的中位时间。5个或更多的骨转移病灶是SRE发生的独立危险因素(比值比=6.06,95%置信区间:1.09-33.54,P=0.039)。与地诺单抗相关的不良事件(AEs)主要包括低钙血症(68.0%)、牙周炎(28.0%)和肌痛(14.0%)。仅报告了3例III/IV级AEs,未发生严重AEs。

结论

地诺单抗在骨转移中国乳腺癌患者中有效且耐受性良好。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/10336762/c4f4890a9f41/10.1177_11795549231182266-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/10336762/c4f4890a9f41/10.1177_11795549231182266-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b17/10336762/c4f4890a9f41/10.1177_11795549231182266-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
A Retrospective Analysis of Denosumab for the Treatment of Bone Metastases in Chinese Patients With Breast Cancer.地诺单抗治疗中国乳腺癌患者骨转移的回顾性分析
Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2023 Jul 10;17:11795549231182266. doi: 10.1177/11795549231182266. eCollection 2023.
2
Economic evaluation of denosumab compared with zoledronic acid in hormone-refractory prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.地诺单抗与唑来膦酸治疗激素难治性前列腺癌骨转移患者的经济学评价
J Manag Care Pharm. 2011 Oct;17(8):621-43. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2011.17.8.621.
3
Risk factors associated with skeletal-related events following discontinuation of denosumab treatment among patients with bone metastases from solid tumors: A real-world machine learning approach.实体瘤骨转移患者停用地诺单抗治疗后与骨相关事件相关的危险因素:一种真实世界的机器学习方法。
J Bone Oncol. 2022 Mar 17;34:100423. doi: 10.1016/j.jbo.2022.100423. eCollection 2022 Jun.
4
Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer.用于乳腺癌的双膦酸盐及其他骨药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Feb 15(2):CD003474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003474.pub3.
5
Which Bone-Modifying Agent is Associated with Better Outcomes in Patients with Skeletal Metastases from Lung Cancer? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.哪种骨改良药物与肺癌骨转移患者的更好结局相关?一项系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2021 Sep 1;479(9):2047-2057. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001749.
6
Examination of burden of skeletal-related events in patients naive to denosumab and intravenous bisphosphonate therapy in bone metastases from solid tumors population.检查初治地舒单抗和静脉用双膦酸盐治疗实体瘤骨转移患者的骨骼相关事件负担。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Mar;35(3):513-523. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1532884. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
7
Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study.地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸治疗晚期乳腺癌骨转移患者的随机、双盲研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10;28(35):5132-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7101. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
8
Bisphosphonates and other bone agents for breast cancer.用于乳腺癌的双膦酸盐及其他骨治疗药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 30;10(10):CD003474. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003474.pub4.
9
Delaying skeletal-related events in a randomized phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancer: an analysis of data from patients with solid tumors.在一项针对晚期癌症患者的地舒单抗与唑来膦酸的随机 3 期研究中延迟骨骼相关事件:来自实体瘤患者的数据分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2014 Mar;22(3):679-87. doi: 10.1007/s00520-013-2022-1. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
10
Cost-effectiveness of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in the management of skeletal metastases secondary to breast cancer.地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸治疗乳腺癌骨转移的成本效果分析。
Clin Ther. 2012 Jun;34(6):1334-49. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.04.008. Epub 2012 May 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Balancing the Scales: The Dual Role of Interleukins in Bone Metastatic Microenvironments.平衡天平:白细胞介素在骨转移微环境中的双重作用。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 26;25(15):8163. doi: 10.3390/ijms25158163.

本文引用的文献

1
Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Breast Cancer Guidelines 2022.中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)乳腺癌诊疗指南2022
Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2022 Apr 30;3:13. doi: 10.21037/tbcr-22-21. eCollection 2022.
2
Breast Cancer, Version 3.2022, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.《NCCN 肿瘤学临床实践指南:乳腺癌》第 3.2022 版
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2022 Jun;20(6):691-722. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2022.0030.
3
Bone health in cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines.癌症中的骨骼健康:ESMO临床实践指南
Ann Oncol. 2020 Dec;31(12):1650-1663. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.07.019. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
4
Bone Pain in Cancer Patients: Mechanisms and Current Treatment.癌症患者的骨痛:机制与现行治疗。
Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Nov 30;20(23):6047. doi: 10.3390/ijms20236047.
5
Optimizing antiresorptive treatment in patients with bone metastases: time to initiation, switching strategies, and treatment duration.优化伴有骨转移患者的抗吸收治疗:起始时间、转换策略和治疗持续时间。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Oct;27(10):3859-3867. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04676-6. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
6
Examination of burden of skeletal-related events in patients naive to denosumab and intravenous bisphosphonate therapy in bone metastases from solid tumors population.检查初治地舒单抗和静脉用双膦酸盐治疗实体瘤骨转移患者的骨骼相关事件负担。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Mar;35(3):513-523. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1532884. Epub 2018 Nov 20.
7
Treatment and pattern of bone metastases in 1094 patients with advanced breast cancer - Results from the prospective German Tumour Registry Breast Cancer cohort study.1094例晚期乳腺癌患者骨转移的治疗及模式——德国肿瘤登记处乳腺癌前瞻性队列研究结果
Eur J Cancer. 2017 Jul;79:139-148. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.03.031. Epub 2017 May 8.
8
Feasibility of extended dosing intervals of denosumab.地诺单抗延长给药间隔的可行性。
J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2018 Jul;24(5):343-347. doi: 10.1177/1078155217703791. Epub 2017 Apr 9.
9
Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: a combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials.地舒单抗优于唑来膦酸预防骨骼相关事件:3 项关键性、随机、3 期临床试验的联合分析。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.08.002. Epub 2012 Sep 10.
10
Denosumab compared with zoledronic acid for the treatment of bone metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer: a randomized, double-blind study.地舒单抗对比唑来膦酸治疗晚期乳腺癌骨转移患者的随机、双盲研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10;28(35):5132-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.29.7101. Epub 2010 Nov 8.