Bates-Jensen Barbara M, McCreath Heather E, Patlan Anabel
School of Nursing, UCLA. Los Angeles, California.
Division of Geriatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA Los Angeles, California.
Wound Repair Regen. 2017 May;25(3):502-511. doi: 10.1111/wrr.12548. Epub 2017 May 31.
We examined the relationship between subepidermal moisture measured using surface electrical capacitance and visual skin assessment of pressure ulcers at the trunk location (sacral, ischial tuberosities) in 417 nursing home residents residing in 19 facilities. Participants were on average older (mean age of 77 years), 58% were female, over half were ethnic minorities (29% African American, 12% Asian American, and 21% Hispanic), and at risk for pressure ulcers (mean score for Braden Scale for Predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk of 15.6). Concurrent visual assessments and subepidermal moisture were obtained at the sacrum and right and left ischium weekly for 16 weeks. Visual assessment was categorized as normal, erythema, stage 1 pressure ulcer, Deep Tissue Injury or stage 2+ pressure ulcer using the National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel 2009 classification system. Incidence of any skin damage was 52%. Subepidermal moisture was measured with a dermal phase meter where higher readings indicate greater moisture (range: 0-70 tissue dielectric constant), with values increasing significantly with the presence of skin damage. Elevated subepidermal moisture values co-occurred with concurrent skin damage in generalized multinomial logistic models (to control for repeated observations) at the sacrum, adjusting for age and risk. Higher subepidermal moisture values were associated with visual damage 1 week later using similar models. Threshold values for subepidermal moisture were compared to visual ratings to predict skin damage 1 week later. Subepidermal moisture of 39 tissue dielectric constant units predicted 41% of future skin damage while visual ratings predicted 27%. Thus, this method of detecting early skin damage holds promise for clinicians, especially as it is objective and equally valid for all groups of patients.
我们在19家机构的417名疗养院居民中,研究了使用表面电容测量的表皮下水分与躯干部位(骶骨、坐骨结节)压疮的视觉皮肤评估之间的关系。参与者平均年龄较大(平均年龄77岁),58%为女性,超过一半是少数族裔(29%非裔美国人、12%亚裔美国人、21%西班牙裔),且有发生压疮的风险(预测压疮风险的Braden量表平均得分为15.6)。在16周内,每周在骶骨以及左右坐骨处同时进行视觉评估和表皮下水分测量。使用2009年国家压疮咨询小组分类系统,视觉评估分为正常、红斑、1期压疮、深部组织损伤或2期及以上压疮。任何皮肤损伤的发生率为52%。使用真皮相位仪测量表皮下水分,读数越高表明水分越多(范围:0 - 70组织介电常数),皮肤损伤时该值会显著增加。在广义多项逻辑模型中(以控制重复观察),骶骨处表皮下水分值升高与同时存在的皮肤损伤同时出现,并对年龄和风险进行了调整。使用类似模型,较高的表皮下水分值与1周后的视觉损伤相关联。将表皮下水分的阈值与视觉评级进行比较,以预测1周后的皮肤损伤。39个组织介电常数单位的表皮下水分可预测41%的未来皮肤损伤,而视觉评级可预测27%。因此,这种检测早期皮肤损伤的方法对临床医生具有前景,特别是因为它是客观的,并且对所有患者群体同样有效。