• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[高度近视黄斑裂孔伴视网膜脱离的单层反转内界膜瓣技术观察]

[Observation of single-layered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole with retinal detachment in high myopia].

作者信息

Xu C Z, Wu J H, He J W, Feng C

机构信息

Aier School of Ophthalmology, Central South University, Changsha 410000, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 11;53(5):338-343. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.05.005.

DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.05.005
PMID:28494561
Abstract

To compare the outcome of pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with a single-layered inverted internal limiting membrane (ILM) flap versus PPV with ILM peeling for the treatment of macular hole associated retinal detachment (MHRD) in high myopia. In a retrospective cohort study, PPV with 2 kinds of adjuvant surgical procedures were used in 35 moderately high myopia eyes with MHRD. These eyes were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (17 eyes) receiving PPV and ILM peeling and group 2 (18 eyes) receiving PPV with a single-layered inverted ILM flap. Anatomical reattachment of the retina, macular hole closure, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were measured at 6 months after surgery. The retina was successfully reattached in all cases. The difference of the retinal reattachment rate between the two groups was not statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, 1.000). The rate of macular hole closure was 47.1% in group 1 (8 eyes) and 88.9% in group 2 (16 eyes). The difference of the macular hole closure rate between the two groups was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test, 0.012). Significant improvement in logarithm of minimal angle of resolution (logMAR) BCVA was achieved in both groups. There was no difference in the initial, final, or improved logMAR BCVA in the 2 groups. Single-layered inverted ILM flap technique effectively helps close the macular hole in moderately high myopia with MHRD. This may prevent the possible redetachment from the macular hole. -.

摘要

比较经平坦部玻璃体切除术(PPV)联合单层反转内界膜(ILM)瓣与PPV联合ILM剥除术治疗高度近视性黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离(MHRD)的疗效。在一项回顾性队列研究中,35只患有MHRD的中度高度近视眼中采用了PPV联合2种辅助手术方法。这些眼睛被分为2组:第1组(17只眼)接受PPV联合ILM剥除术,第2组(18只眼)接受PPV联合单层反转ILM瓣术。在术后6个月测量视网膜的解剖复位、黄斑裂孔闭合情况以及最佳矫正视力(BCVA)。所有病例视网膜均成功复位。两组间视网膜复位率的差异无统计学意义(Fisher精确检验,P = 1.000)。第1组黄斑裂孔闭合率为47.1%(8只眼),第2组为88.9%(共16只眼)。两组间黄斑裂孔闭合率的差异有统计学意义(Fisher精确检验,P = 0.012)。两组的最小分辨角对数(logMAR)BCVA均有显著改善。两组在初始、最终或改善后的logMAR BCVA方面无差异。单层反转ILM瓣技术可有效帮助中度高度近视性MHRD患者闭合黄斑裂孔。这可能预防黄斑裂孔导致的视网膜再次脱离。

相似文献

1
[Observation of single-layered inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole with retinal detachment in high myopia].[高度近视黄斑裂孔伴视网膜脱离的单层反转内界膜瓣技术观察]
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi. 2017 May 11;53(5):338-343. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0412-4081.2017.05.005.
2
Inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique as a useful procedure for macular hole-associated retinal detachment in highly myopic eyes.内界膜翻转瓣技术作为高度近视眼黄斑裂孔相关视网膜脱离的一种有效手术方法。
Eye (Lond). 2017 Apr;31(4):545-550. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.263. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
3
Vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane peeling versus inverted internal limiting membrane flap technique for macular hole-induced retinal detachment: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.玻璃体切除术联合内界膜剥除术与内界膜翻转瓣技术治疗黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离:文献系统评价与Meta分析
BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Nov 28;17(1):219. doi: 10.1186/s12886-017-0619-8.
4
Pars plana vitrectomy with internal limiting membrane flap versus pars plana vitrectomy with conventional internal limiting membrane peeling for large macular hole.玻切联合内界膜瓣翻转术与常规玻切联合内界膜剥除术治疗大孔性黄斑裂孔的对比。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Aug 7;8(8):CD015031. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015031.pub2.
5
Inverted Internal Limiting Membrane Flap versus Internal Limiting Membrane Peeling for Macular Hole Retinal Detachment in High Myopia.倒置内界膜瓣与内界膜剥除术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的比较
Ophthalmol Retina. 2020 Sep;4(9):919-926. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2020.03.021. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
6
EFFICACY OF THE INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE WITH VITRECTOMY FOR RETINAL DETACHMENT ASSOCIATED WITH MYOPIC MACULAR HOLES.玻璃体切除术联合倒转式内界膜瓣技术治疗近视性黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的疗效
Retina. 2017 Mar;37(3):466-471. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000001211.
7
Effectiveness of combined macular buckle under direct vision and vitrectomy with ILM peeling in refractory macular hole retinal detachment with extreme high axial myopia: a 24-month comparative study.直视下黄斑扣带联合玻璃体切除术及内界膜剥除术治疗极高度轴性近视性难治性黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离的疗效:一项24个月的对照研究
Br J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;101(10):1386-1394. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-310123. Epub 2017 Mar 14.
8
Efficacy of vitrectomy with triamcinolone assistance versus internal limiting membrane peeling for highly myopic macular hole retinal detachment.玻璃体内切除联合曲安奈德辅助治疗与内界膜剥除治疗高度近视黄斑孔视网膜脱离的疗效比较。
Retina. 2013 Jun;33(6):1151-7. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e31827b6422.
9
Inverted internal limiting membrane insertion versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia: one-year study.高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离中内界膜内反式插入与标准内界膜剥离的比较:一年研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;256(8):1387-1393. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4046-1. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
10
PERFLUOROCARBON LIQUID-ASSISTED INVERTED INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE FLAP TECHNIQUE VERSUS INTERNAL LIMITING MEMBRANE PEELING FOR HIGHLY MYOPIC MACULAR HOLE RETINAL DETACHMENT.全氟碳液体辅助反转内界膜瓣技术与内界膜撕除治疗高度近视黄斑孔性视网膜脱离的比较。
Retina. 2021 Feb 1;41(2):317-323. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000002853.

引用本文的文献

1
A Comparison of Face-Down Positioning and Adjustable Positioning After Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Macular Hole Retinal Detachment in High Myopia.高度近视黄斑裂孔性视网膜脱离玻璃体切割术后俯卧位与可调节体位的比较
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Feb 16;9:780475. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.780475. eCollection 2022.
2
Vitrectomy with inverted internal limiting membrane flap versus internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia: a systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.玻璃体切割术联合内界膜翻转瓣与内界膜剥除术治疗高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离:文献系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eye (Lond). 2019 Oct;33(10):1626-1634. doi: 10.1038/s41433-019-0458-3. Epub 2019 May 9.
3
Inverted internal limiting membrane insertion versus standard internal limiting membrane peeling for macular hole retinal detachment in high myopia: one-year study.
高度近视黄斑裂孔视网膜脱离中内界膜内反式插入与标准内界膜剥离的比较:一年研究。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2018 Aug;256(8):1387-1393. doi: 10.1007/s00417-018-4046-1. Epub 2018 Jun 18.