• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在2年随访期内,用两种不同树脂基制剂保护的玻璃离子封闭剂的临床性能。

Clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant protected with two different resin-based agents over a 2-year follow-up period.

作者信息

Ulusoy A T, Tunc E S, Bayrak Ş

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Ondokuz Mayis, Samsun, Turkey.

Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Osmangazi, Eskişehir, Turkey.

出版信息

Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Mar;18(1):10-14. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.01.02.

DOI:10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.01.02
PMID:28494595
Abstract

AIM

To evaluate the effects of two different resin coating materials on the clinical performance of a conventional glass ionomer sealant.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Permanent first mandibular molars of 60 children aged 6-9 years were sealed with Fuji VII. In each child, G-Coat Plus coating agent was applied to molars on one side and Heliobond coating agent to molars on the opposite side of the mouth. Clinical evaluations were carried out at 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after sealant and coating application.

RESULTS

At 1, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months after sealant and coating application, total sealant retention rates were 88%, 40%, 19%, 15% and 9% for molars coated with G-Coat Plus, and 93%, 47%, 17%, 15% and 7% for those coated with Heliobond. The differences between the two coating agents were not statistically significant (p>0.05). No incidence of caries was observed in either group during the two-year evaluation period.

STATISTICS

Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare differences in retention rates and caries incidence by coating agent.

CONCLUSION

Although retention rates of Fuji VII were relatively low and similar for both resin coating agents tested, dental caries were not observed in either group during the 24-month study period. In children with a high risk of caries and partially erupted molars, the use of a glass ionomer sealant with a resin-based coating agent should be encouraged.

摘要

目的

评估两种不同树脂涂层材料对传统玻璃离子封闭剂临床性能的影响。

材料与方法

选取60名6 - 9岁儿童的下颌第一恒磨牙,用富士VII进行封闭。在每个儿童口中,一侧磨牙使用G - Coat Plus涂层剂,另一侧磨牙使用Heliobond涂层剂。在封闭剂和涂层剂应用后的1、6、12、18和24个月进行临床评估。

结果

在封闭剂和涂层剂应用后的1、6、12、18和24个月,使用G - Coat Plus涂层的磨牙封闭剂总保留率分别为88%、40%、19%、15%和9%,使用Heliobond涂层的磨牙封闭剂总保留率分别为93%、47%、17%、15%和7%。两种涂层剂之间的差异无统计学意义(p>0.05)。在两年的评估期内,两组均未观察到龋齿发生。

统计学方法

采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验比较不同涂层剂的保留率和龋齿发生率差异。

结论

尽管富士VII的保留率相对较低,且两种测试树脂涂层剂的保留率相似,但在24个月的研究期内两组均未观察到龋齿。对于患龋风险高且磨牙部分萌出的儿童,应鼓励使用含树脂基涂层剂的玻璃离子封闭剂。

相似文献

1
Clinical performance of a glass ionomer sealant protected with two different resin-based agents over a 2-year follow-up period.在2年随访期内,用两种不同树脂基制剂保护的玻璃离子封闭剂的临床性能。
Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2017 Mar;18(1):10-14. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2017.18.01.02.
2
Twenty-four month clinical evaluation of fissure sealants on partially erupted permanent first molars: glass ionomer versus resin-based sealant.部分萌出的恒牙窝沟封闭剂 24 个月临床评价:玻璃离子水门汀与树脂基封闭剂。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2012 Feb;143(2):115-22. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2012.0121.
3
Retention of a resin-based sealant and a glass ionomer used as a fissure sealant: a comparative clinical study.用作窝沟封闭剂的树脂基封闭剂和玻璃离子水门汀的保留率:一项对比临床研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2008 Sep;26(3):114-20. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.43192.
4
[Caries prevention effectiveness of aresin based sealant and a glass ionomer sealants: a report of 5-year-follow-up].[一种树脂基封闭剂和一种玻璃离子封闭剂的防龋效果:5年随访报告]
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 9;53(7):437-442. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2018.07.002.
5
The success rates of a glass ionomer cement and a resin-based fissure sealant placed by fifth-year undergraduate dental students.五年级牙科本科学生放置玻璃离子水门汀和树脂基窝沟封闭剂的成功率。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2012 Apr;13(2):94-7. doi: 10.1007/BF03262852.
6
Survival Analysis of Glass Ionomer Cement and Resin-Based Sealant Retention: A 10-Year Follow-Up Study.玻璃离聚物水泥和树脂基密封剂保留的生存分析:一项 10 年随访研究。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 May 1;60(5):756. doi: 10.3390/medicina60050756.
7
Caries-Preventive Effect and Retention of Glass-Ionomer and Resin-Based Sealants: A Randomized Clinical Comparative Evaluation.玻璃离子水门汀和树脂基密封剂的防龋效果和保留率:一项随机临床对比评价。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Jun 20;2022:7205692. doi: 10.1155/2022/7205692. eCollection 2022.
8
Clinical and antibacterial effectiveness of three different sealant materials.三种不同封闭剂材料的临床及抗菌效果
J Dent Hyg. 2008 Fall;82(5):45. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
9
Caries-preventive effect of a one-time application of composite resin and glass ionomer sealants after 5 years.一次性应用复合树脂和玻璃离子封闭剂5年后的防龋效果
Caries Res. 2006;40(1):52-9. doi: 10.1159/000088907.
10
Microcavitated (ICDAS 3) carious lesion arrest with resin or glass ionomer sealants in first permanent molars: A randomized controlled trial.微囊化(ICDAS 3 级)龋损用树脂或玻璃离子水门汀在前磨牙窝沟封闭中的效果:一项随机对照试验。
J Dent. 2019 Sep;88:103163. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.001. Epub 2019 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Protective effect of a nanofilled resin-based coating on wear resistance of glass ionomer cement restorative materials.纳米复合树脂涂层对玻璃离子水门汀修复材料耐磨性的保护作用。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jul 30;22(1):317. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02347-3.
2
The Effectiveness of Fluoride Varnish and Fissure Sealant in Elementary School Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.氟化物涂膜和窝沟封闭剂在小学生中的有效性:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Iran J Public Health. 2022 Feb;51(2):266-277. doi: 10.18502/ijph.v51i2.8680.
3
Performance of fissure sealants on fully erupted permanent molars with incipient carious lesions: A glass-ionomer-based versus a resin-based sealant.
基于玻璃离子体与基于树脂的窝沟封闭剂对患有早期龋损的完全萌出恒牙的封闭效果
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2020 Winter;14(1):61-67. doi: 10.34172/joddd.2020.009.
4
Clinical wear of approximal glass ionomer restorations protected with a nanofilled self-adhesive light-cured protective coating.用纳米填充自粘光固化保护涂层保护的邻面玻璃离子修复体的临床磨损情况
J Appl Oral Sci. 2018 Oct 4;26:e20180094. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2018-0094.