O'Brien Lisa, Mitchell Deb, Skinner Elizabeth H, Haas Romi, Ghaly Marcelle, McDermott Fiona, May Kerry, Haines Terry
Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University - Peninsula Campus, PO Box 527, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia.
Allied Health Workforce, Innovation, Strategy, Education and Research Unit, Monash Health, Moorabbin, Australia.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 May 12;17(1):345. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2279-z.
There is strong public support for acute hospital services to move to genuine 7-day models, including access to multidisciplinary team assessment. This study aimed to identify factors that might enable an effective and cost-effective weekend allied health services on acute hospital wards.
This qualitative study included 22 focus groups within acute wards with a weekend allied health service and 11 telephone interviews with weekend service providers. Data were collected from 210 hospital team members, including 17 medical, 97 nursing, and 96 allied health professionals from two Australian tertiary public hospitals. All were recorded and imported into nVivo 10 for analysis. Thematic analysis methods were used to develop a coding framework from the data and to identify emerging themes.
Key themes identified were separated into issues perceived as being enablers or barriers to the effective or cost-effective delivery of weekend allied health services. Perceived enablers of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness included prioritizing interventions that prevent decline, the right person delivering the right service, improved access to the patient's family, and ability to impact patient flow. Perceived barriers were employment of inexperienced weekend staff, insufficient investment to see tangible benefit, inefficiencies related to double-handling, unnecessary interventions and/or inappropriate referrals, and difficulty recruiting and retaining skilled staff.
Suggestions for ensuring effective and cost effective weekend allied health care models include minimization of task duplication and targeting interventions so that the right patients receive the right interventions at the right time. Further research into the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of these services should factor in hidden costs, including those associated with managing the service.
公众大力支持急性医院服务转向真正的7天模式,包括提供多学科团队评估。本研究旨在确定可能有助于在急性医院病房提供有效且具成本效益的周末联合健康服务的因素。
这项定性研究包括在设有周末联合健康服务的急性病房内进行的22个焦点小组讨论,以及对周末服务提供者进行的11次电话访谈。数据收集自210名医院团队成员,包括来自澳大利亚两家三级公立医院的17名医生、97名护士和96名联合健康专业人员。所有访谈均进行了录音,并导入NVivo 10进行分析。采用主题分析方法从数据中构建编码框架并确定新出现的主题。
确定的关键主题分为被视为对周末联合健康服务的有效或具成本效益提供有促进作用或阻碍作用的问题。被视为有效性和成本效益促进因素的包括优先进行预防病情恶化的干预措施、合适的人员提供合适的服务、改善与患者家属的沟通以及影响患者流程的能力。被视为阻碍因素的有雇佣缺乏经验的周末工作人员、缺乏能看到切实效益的投资、与重复操作相关的低效率、不必要的干预和/或不恰当的转诊,以及招聘和留住熟练员工的困难。
确保有效且具成本效益的周末联合健康护理模式的建议包括尽量减少任务重复并针对干预措施,以便合适的患者在合适的时间接受合适的干预。对这些服务的有效性和成本效益的进一步研究应考虑隐性成本,包括与管理服务相关的成本。