Chow Jessica L, Niedzwiecki Matthew J, Hsia Renee Y
UCSF/San Francisco General Hospital Emergency Medicine Residency Program, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States.
BMJ Open. 2017 May 11;7(5):e014721. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014721.
Given increasing demand for emergency care, there is growing concern over the availability of emergency department (ED) and inpatient resources. Existing studies of ED bed supply are dated and often overlook hospital capacity beyond ED settings. We described recent statewide trends in the capacity of ED and inpatient hospital services from 2005 to 2014.
Retrospective analysis.
Using California hospital data, we examined the absolute and per admission changes in ED beds and inpatient beds in all hospitals from 2005 to 2014.
Our sample consisted of all patients inpatient and outpatient) from 501 hospital facilities over 10-year period.
We analysed linear trends in the total annual ED visits, ED beds, licensed and staffed inpatient hospital beds and bed types, ED beds per ED visit, and inpatient beds per admission (ED and non-ED).
Between 2005 and 2014, ED visits increased from 9.8 million to 13.2 million (an increase of 35.0%, p<0.001). ED beds also increased (by 29.8%, p<0.001), with an average annual increase of 195.4 beds. Despite this growth, ED beds per visit decreased by 3.9%, from 6.0 ED beds per 10 000 ED visits in 2005 to 5.8 beds in 2014 (p=0.01). While overall admission numbers declined by 4.9% (p=0.06), inpatient medical/surgical beds per visit grew by 11.3%, from 11.6 medical/surgical beds per 1000 admissions in 2005 to 12.9 beds in 2014 (p<0.001). However, there were reductions in psychiatric and chemical dependency beds per admission, by -15.3% (p<0.001) and -22.4% (p=0.05), respectively.
These trends suggest that, in its current state, inadequate supply of ED and specific inpatient beds cannot keep pace with growing patient demand for acute care. Analysis of ED and inpatient supply should capture dynamic variations in patient demand. Our novel 'beds pervisit' metric offers improvements over traditional supply measures.
鉴于急诊护理需求不断增加,人们对急诊科(ED)和住院资源的可及性日益担忧。现有的关于急诊科床位供应的研究已过时,且常常忽视急诊科以外的医院容量。我们描述了2005年至2014年全州范围内急诊科和住院医院服务容量的近期趋势。
回顾性分析。
利用加利福尼亚州医院数据,我们研究了2005年至2014年所有医院急诊科床位和住院床位的绝对变化及每次入院的变化情况。
我们的样本包括10年间501家医院设施的所有住院患者和门诊患者。
我们分析了年度急诊就诊总量、急诊科床位、持牌和配备工作人员的住院医院床位及床位类型、每次急诊就诊的急诊科床位数、每次入院的住院床位数(包括急诊科和非急诊科)的线性趋势。
2005年至2014年期间,急诊就诊次数从980万次增加到1320万次(增长35.0%,p<0.001)。急诊科床位也有所增加(增长29.8%,p<0.001),平均每年增加195.4张床位。尽管有这种增长,但每次就诊的急诊科床位数下降了3.9%,从2005年每10000次急诊就诊6.0张急诊科床位降至2014年的5.8张(p=0.01)。虽然总体入院人数下降了4.9%(p=0.06),但每次就诊的住院内科/外科床位数增长了11.3%,从2005年每1000次入院11.6张内科/外科床位增至2014年的12.9张(p<0.001)。然而,每次入院的精神科和化学依赖治疗床位数分别减少了15.3%(p<0.001)和22.4%(p=0.05)。
这些趋势表明,就目前状况而言,急诊科和特定住院床位供应不足,无法跟上患者对急性护理不断增长的需求。对急诊科和住院床位供应的分析应考虑患者需求的动态变化。我们新颖的“每次就诊床位数”指标比传统供应指标有所改进。