• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国急诊科不断演变的角色。

The Evolving Role of Emergency Departments in the United States.

作者信息

Morganti Kristy Gonzalez, Bauhoff Sebastian, Blanchard Janice C, Abir Mahshid, Iyer Neema, Smith Alexandria, Vesely Joseph V, Okeke Edward N, Kellermann Arthur L

出版信息

Rand Health Q. 2013 Jun 1;3(2):3. eCollection 2013 Summer.

PMID:28083290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4945168/
Abstract

The research described in this article was performed to develop a more complete picture of how hospital emergency departments (EDs) contribute to the U.S. health care system, which is currently evolving in response to economic, clinical, and political pressures. Using a mix of quantitative and qualitative methods, it explores the evolving role that EDs and the personnel who staff them play in evaluating and managing complex and high-acuity patients, serving as the key decisionmaker for roughly half of all inpatient hospital admissions, and serving as "the safety net of the safety net" for patients who cannot get care elsewhere. The report also examines the role that EDs may soon play in either contributing to or helping to control the rising costs of health care.

摘要

本文所述研究旨在更全面地了解医院急诊科在美国医疗保健系统中所起的作用,目前该系统正随着经济、临床和政治压力而不断演变。通过定量和定性方法相结合,该研究探讨了急诊科及其工作人员在评估和管理复杂及重症患者方面不断演变的作用,这些患者约占所有住院患者的一半,是关键决策点,同时急诊科还为无法在其他地方获得治疗的患者充当“安全网中的安全网”。该报告还研究了急诊科可能很快在推动或帮助控制医疗保健成本上升方面所起的作用。

相似文献

1
The Evolving Role of Emergency Departments in the United States.美国急诊科不断演变的角色。
Rand Health Q. 2013 Jun 1;3(2):3. eCollection 2013 Summer.
2
Characteristics of emergency departments serving high volumes of safety-net patients: United States, 2000.为大量安全网患者提供服务的急诊科的特点:美国,2000年
Vital Health Stat 13. 2004 May(155):1-16.
3
Rising pressure: hospital emergency departments as barometers of the health care system.压力上升:作为医疗保健系统晴雨表的医院急诊科
Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2005 Nov(101):1-4.
4
Admissions to intensive care units from emergency departments: a descriptive study.急诊科转入重症监护病房的情况:一项描述性研究。
Emerg Med J. 2005 Jun;22(6):423-8. doi: 10.1136/emj.2003.005124.
5
Threats to the health care safety net.对医疗安全网的威胁。
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Nov;8(11):1080-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01119.x.
6
National Study of Self-reported Pediatric Areas in United States General Emergency Departments.美国普通急诊部自我报告儿科区域的全国性研究。
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Dec;25(12):1458-1462. doi: 10.1111/acem.13633. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
NIH: developing and funding research in emergency care and training the next generation of emergency care researchers.NIH:在急诊护理方面开展研究和提供资金,并培养下一代急诊护理研究人员。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Dec;32(12):2186-92. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0833.
8
[Analysis of the emergency system of the Spanish neurosurgical services].[西班牙神经外科服务应急系统分析]
Neurocirugia (Astur). 2003 Apr;14(2):81-106.
9
Overcrowding crisis in our nation's emergency departments: is our safety net unraveling?我国急诊科的过度拥挤危机:我们的安全网正在瓦解吗?
Pediatrics. 2004 Sep;114(3):878-88. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1287.
10
Frequent overcrowding in U.S. emergency departments.美国急诊科频繁人满为患。
Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Feb;8(2):151-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2001.tb01280.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Medical Student Involvement on Emergency Department Outcomes: A Tertiary Center Analysis.医学生参与对急诊科治疗结果的影响:一项三级中心分析。
West J Emerg Med. 2025 Jul 8;26(4):773-780. doi: 10.5811/westjem.42229.
2
Revisits, Readmission, and Mortality From Emergency Department Admissions for Older Adults With Vague Presentations: Longitudinal Observational Study.老年患者因症状不明确而急诊入院后的复诊、再入院及死亡率:纵向观察研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 Feb 6;8:e55929. doi: 10.2196/55929.
3
Palliative Care Initiated in the Emergency Department: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.急诊科启动的姑息治疗:一项整群随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2025 Feb 18;333(7):599-608. doi: 10.1001/jama.2024.23696.
4
Restructuring the role of emergency departments in the healthcare systems: a vector to improving physician resilience.重塑急诊部门在医疗系统中的角色:提高医生适应力的一种途径。
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;20(2):535-540. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03814-1. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
5
Drug-drug-interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted to the emergency department.急诊科收治的心房颤动患者的药物相互作用。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Oct 15;15:1432713. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1432713. eCollection 2024.
6
Patient, caregiver and professional views on preventable emergency admissions of older patients, a multi-method study in three Dutch hospitals.患者、护理人员和专业人员对老年患者可预防急诊入院的看法,荷兰三家医院的一项多方法研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Aug 10;24(1):673. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05267-9.
7
How Do Pharmacists Distribute Their Work Time during a Clinical Intervention Trial?-A Time and Motion Study.药剂师在临床干预试验中如何分配工作时间?——一项时间与动作研究。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Jul 9;12(4):106. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12040106.
8
Trends in Substance Use Disorder-Related Emergency Department Visits in California: An Analysis of 46 Million Visits From 2006 to 2011.加利福尼亚州与物质使用障碍相关的急诊科就诊趋势:对2006年至2011年4600万次就诊的分析。
Perm J. 2024 Sep 16;28(3):69-75. doi: 10.7812/TPP/23.181. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
9
Key factors for sustainable working conditions in emergency departments: an EUSEM-initiated, Europe-wide consensus survey.急诊科可持续工作条件的关键因素:一项由欧洲急诊医学学会发起的全欧洲范围的共识调查。
Eur J Emerg Med. 2025 Feb 1;32(1):29-37. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0000000000001159. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
10
Acute patients discharged without an established diagnosis: risk of mortality and readmission of nonspecific diagnoses compared to disease-specific diagnoses.急性病患者出院时未明确诊断:与特定疾病诊断相比,非特异性诊断的死亡率和再入院风险。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024 Apr 19;32(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13049-024-01191-4.