• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

开放手术与血管腔内手术治疗慢性下肢缺血患者并发症发生率及必要二次手术干预的比较

Comparison of the Incidence of Complications and Secondary Surgical Interventions Necessary in Patients with Chronic Lower Limb Ischemia Treated by Both Open and Endovascular Surgeries.

作者信息

Janczak Dariusz, Malinowski Maciej, Bąkowski Wojciech, Krakowska Katarzyna, Marschollek Karol, Marschollek Paweł, Chabowski Mariusz

机构信息

Division of Surgical Specialties, Department of Clinical Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.

Department of Surgery, 4th Military Teaching Hospital, Wroclaw, Poland.

出版信息

Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jun 20;23(3):135-140. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00282. Epub 2017 May 11.

DOI:10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00282
PMID:28496017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5483860/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) affects 3%-10% of the population before the age of 70 years and 15%-20% after that age.The aim of the study was to compare the incidence of complications and secondary interventions in patients who underwent each type of treatment.

METHODS

We analyzed 734 medical records of the Department of Surgery at the 4th Military Teaching Hospital in Wroclaw, In total, 394 were operated on with open surgery; an endarterectomy (59.39%), a vascular prosthesis implantation (31.01%), or both of these techniques (6.6%), and 340 patients had angioplasty with (50.59%) or without stenting (49.41%).

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of corresponding complications. The exception was the infection of the wound; significantly fewer were reported in the case of endovascular procedures (p = 0.0087). There were 12 occasions (3.53%) during endovascular surgeries when intraoperative conversion or re-operation using the open method occurred. In the case of open surgery, the mean hospital stay was 7.77 days (median: 8, mode: 8), while for endovascular management it was equal to 4.68 days (median: 4, mode: 3), p <0.0001.

CONCLUSION

The endovascular method results in a similar re-operation rate and number of complications as open surgery.

摘要

背景

外周动脉疾病(PAD)在70岁之前影响3%-10%的人群,70岁之后影响15%-20%的人群。本研究的目的是比较接受每种治疗类型的患者并发症发生率和二次干预情况。

方法

我们分析了弗罗茨瓦夫第四军事教学医院外科的734份病历。总共有394例患者接受了开放手术,其中内膜切除术(59.39%)、血管假体植入术(31.01%)或两种技术均采用(6.6%);340例患者接受了有支架(50.59%)或无支架(49.41%)的血管成形术。

结果

相应并发症的发生率无统计学显著差异。伤口感染除外,血管内手术报告的此类感染明显较少(p = 0.0087)。血管内手术中有12次(3.53%)出现术中转为开放手术或再次手术的情况。开放手术患者的平均住院时间为7.77天(中位数:8,众数:8),而血管内治疗为4.68天(中位数:4,众数:3),p <0.0001。

结论

血管内治疗方法导致的再次手术率和并发症数量与开放手术相似。

相似文献

1
Comparison of the Incidence of Complications and Secondary Surgical Interventions Necessary in Patients with Chronic Lower Limb Ischemia Treated by Both Open and Endovascular Surgeries.开放手术与血管腔内手术治疗慢性下肢缺血患者并发症发生率及必要二次手术干预的比较
Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017 Jun 20;23(3):135-140. doi: 10.5761/atcs.oa.16-00282. Epub 2017 May 11.
2
In-hospital versus postdischarge major adverse events within 30 days following lower extremity revascularization.下肢血运重建术后 30 天内住院期间与出院后主要不良事件比较。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Feb;69(2):482-489. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.06.207. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
3
Risk factors for readmission after lower extremity procedures for peripheral artery disease.下肢动脉疾病外周血管手术后再入院的风险因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Jul;58(1):90-7.e1-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.031. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
4
Unplanned return to operating room after lower extremity endovascular intervention is an independent predictor for hospital readmission.下肢血管腔内介入治疗后计划外重返手术室是医院再入院的独立预测因素。
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jun;65(6):1735-1744.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.12.121. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
5
Hybrid revascularization of complex multilevel disease: a paradigm shift in critical limb ischemia treatment.复杂多节段疾病的杂交血管重建术:严重肢体缺血治疗的范式转变
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2014 Oct;55(5):613-23. Epub 2014 Jun 18.
6
Loss of kidney function in patients with critical limb ischemia treated endovascularly or surgically.接受血管内治疗或手术治疗的严重肢体缺血患者的肾功能丧失。
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Aug;64(2):362-368. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.03.409. Epub 2016 Apr 30.
7
Hypercoagulability predicts worse outcomes in young patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization.高凝状态预示着行下肢血运重建术的年轻患者预后更差。
J Vasc Surg. 2019 Jul;70(1):175-180. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.09.062. Epub 2018 Dec 21.
8
Combined percutaneous endovascular iliac angioplasty and infrainguinal surgical revascularization for chronic lower extremity ischemia: preliminary result.经皮血管腔内髂动脉血管成形术联合腹股沟下手术血运重建治疗慢性下肢缺血:初步结果
Vascular. 2010 Mar-Apr;18(2):71-6. doi: 10.2310/6670.2010.00007.
9
Role of simple and complex hybrid revascularization procedures for symptomatic lower extremity occlusive disease.单纯与复合杂交血运重建术在下肢症状性闭塞性疾病中的作用。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Jun;51(6):1425-1435.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.092.
10
Anemia Increases Mortality After Open or Endovascular Treatment in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: A Retrospective Analysis.贫血增加严重肢体缺血患者开放或血管内治疗后的死亡率:一项回顾性分析。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016 Apr;51(4):543-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2015.12.006. Epub 2016 Jan 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Animal models of ischemic limb ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.缺血性肢体溃疡动物模型:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Aug;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-001676.
2
Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/stent treatment of totally occlusive iliofemoral artery with limb ischemia: Experience of surgical team.经皮腔内血管成形术/支架置入术治疗伴有肢体缺血的完全闭塞性髂股动脉:手术团队的经验
Turk Gogus Kalp Damar Cerrahisi Derg. 2018 Jul 3;26(3):414-421. doi: 10.5606/tgkdc.dergisi.2018.15503. eCollection 2018 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Long-term limb salvage and survival after endovascular and open revascularization for critical limb ischemia after adoption of endovascular-first approach by vascular surgeons.血管外科医生采用血管内优先治疗策略后,对于严重肢体缺血患者进行血管内和开放血运重建的长期肢体保肢和生存。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Aug;56(2):361-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.01.054. Epub 2012 May 5.
2
Lower-limb ischemia in the young patient: management strategies in an endovascular era.年轻患者的下肢缺血:血管腔内治疗时代的管理策略
Ann Vasc Surg. 2012 May;26(4):591-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2011.06.008. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
3
Markers of inflammation in relation to long-term cardiovascular mortality in patients with lower-extremity peripheral arterial disease.下肢外周动脉疾病患者炎症标志物与长期心血管死亡率的关系。
Int J Cardiol. 2012 Oct 4;160(2):89-94. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.03.030. Epub 2011 Apr 3.
4
Peripheral artery disease: current insight into the disease and its diagnosis and management.外周动脉疾病:疾病现状及诊断与治疗的最新认识。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Jul;85(7):678-92. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0133.
5
Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial: An intention-to-treat analysis of amputation-free and overall survival in patients randomized to a bypass surgery-first or a balloon angioplasty-first revascularization strategy.BASIL 试验:严重肢体缺血患者旁路与血管成形术治疗(BASIL)试验:随机分为旁路手术优先或球囊血管成形术优先血运重建策略的患者的意向治疗分析,免于截肢和总生存。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 May;51(5 Suppl):5S-17S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.01.073.
6
Open versus endovascular intervention for critical limb ischemia: a population-based study.开放手术与血管内介入治疗肢体严重缺血:基于人群的研究。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):555-61, 561-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.019.
7
An analysis of the outcomes of a decade of experience with lower extremity revascularization including limb salvage, lengths of stay, and safety.一项对下肢血运重建十年经验的结果分析,包括肢体挽救率、住院时间和安全性。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Apr;51(4):878-85, 885.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2009.10.102. Epub 2010 Jan 4.
8
Which is the best revascularization for critical limb ischemia: Endovascular or open surgery?对于严重肢体缺血,哪种血运重建方式最佳:血管腔内治疗还是开放手术?
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Dec;48(6 Suppl):11S-16S. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.08.036.
9
Risk factors for failure of lower-extremity revascularization procedures: are they different for bypass and percutaneous procedures?下肢血管重建手术失败的危险因素:搭桥手术和经皮手术的危险因素是否不同?
Semin Vasc Surg. 2008 Sep;21(3):143-53. doi: 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2008.05.007.
10
Increased endovascular interventions decrease the rate of lower limb artery bypass operations without an increase in major amputation rate.血管内介入治疗的增加降低了下肢动脉搭桥手术的发生率,而未增加大截肢率。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 Mar;22(2):195-9. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.12.002.