Liebrand Matthias, Pein Inga, Tzvi Elinor, Krämer Ulrike M
Department of Neurology, University of LübeckLübeck, Germany.
Graduate School for Computing in Medicine and Life Sciences, University of LübeckLübeck, Germany.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Apr 27;11:204. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2017.00204. eCollection 2017.
Proactive motor inhibition refers to endogenous preparatory mechanisms facilitating action inhibition, whereas reactive motor inhibition is considered to be a sudden stopping process triggered by external signals. Previous studies were inconclusive about the temporal dynamics of involved neurocognitive processes during proactive and reactive motor control. Using electroencephalography (EEG), we investigated the time-course of proactive and reactive inhibition, measuring event-related oscillations and event-related potentials (ERPs). Participants performed in a cued go/nogo paradigm with cues indicating whether the motor response might or might not have to be inhibited. Based on the dual mechanisms of control (DMC) framework by Braver, we investigated the role of attentional effects, motor preparation in the sensorimotor cortex and prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms, separating effects before and after target onset. In the cue-target interval, proactive motor inhibition was associated with increased attention, reflected in reduced visual alpha power and an increased contingent negative variation (CNV). At the same time, motor inhibition was modulated by reduced sensorimotor beta power. After target onset, proactive inhibition resulted in an increased N1, indicating allocation of attention towards relevant stimuli, increased prefrontal beta power and a modulation of sensorimotor mu activity. As in previous studies, reactive stopping of motor actions was associated with increased prefrontal beta power and increased sensorimotor beta activity. The results stress the relevance of attentional mechanisms for proactive inhibition and speak for different neurocognitive mechanisms being involved in the early preparation for and in later implementation of motor inhibition.
主动运动抑制是指促进动作抑制的内源性准备机制,而反应性运动抑制被认为是由外部信号触发的突然停止过程。先前的研究对于主动和反应性运动控制过程中所涉及的神经认知过程的时间动态尚无定论。我们使用脑电图(EEG)来研究主动和反应性抑制的时间进程,测量事件相关振荡和事件相关电位(ERP)。参与者在一个线索提示的“执行/不执行”范式中进行任务,线索指示运动反应是否可能需要被抑制。基于Braver的双重控制机制(DMC)框架,我们研究了注意效应、感觉运动皮层中的运动准备以及前额叶认知控制机制的作用,区分目标出现之前和之后的效应。在线索-目标间隔期间,主动运动抑制与注意力增强相关,表现为视觉α波功率降低和关联性负变化(CNV)增加。同时,运动抑制受到感觉运动β波功率降低的调节。目标出现后,主动抑制导致N1波增强,表明对相关刺激的注意力分配增加,前额叶β波功率增加以及感觉运动μ活动受到调节。与先前的研究一样,运动动作的反应性停止与前额叶β波功率增加和感觉运动β活动增加有关。这些结果强调了注意机制对主动抑制的相关性,并表明在运动抑制的早期准备和后期实施中涉及不同的神经认知机制。