Sehra Ruchir, Narayan Sanjiv M, Hummel John
San Diego Veterans Administration Medical Center, La Jolla, CA and University of California, San Diego.
The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH.
J Atr Fibrillation. 2013 Jun 30;6(1):811. doi: 10.4022/jafib.811. eCollection 2013 Jun-Jul.
Ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is an important and exciting therapy whose results remain suboptimal. Although most clinical trials show that ablation eliminates AF more effectively than medications, it is disappointing that the continued single procedural success remains ≈50% despite the substantial advances that have taken place in imaging, catheter positioning and energy delivery. Focal impulse and rotor modulation (FIRM), on the other hand, offers the opportunity to precisely define and then ablate patient-specific sustaining mechanisms for AF, rather than trying to eliminate all possible AF triggers. For over a decade, electrophysiologists have described cases in which AF terminates after only limited ablation - usually that cannot be explained by 'random' meandering wavelets. Indeed, recent studies from several laboratories show that all forms of clinical AF are typically 'driven' by stable electrical rotors and focal sources, not by multiple meandering waves. FIRM mapping enables an operator to place a catheter at typically 1-3 predicted sites in the atria, and with <5-10 minutes of RF ablation, terminate AF and potentially render it non-inducible. Several independent laboratories have now shown that such FIRM ablation alone can terminate or substantially slow AF in >80% of patients with persistent and paroxysmal AF and increase the single procedure rate of AF elimination from 50% with PV isolation alone to >80%. Ongoing studies hint that FIRM only ablation, enabling ablation times in the range observed for typical atrial flutter, may also achieve these high success rates without subsequent trigger ablation. This review summarizes the current state-of-the-art on FIRM mapping and ablation.
心房颤动(AF)消融术是一种重要且令人振奋的治疗方法,但其效果仍不尽人意。尽管大多数临床试验表明,消融术消除房颤比药物治疗更有效,但令人失望的是,尽管在成像、导管定位和能量传递方面取得了重大进展,单次手术的持续成功率仍约为50%。另一方面,局灶性冲动和转子调制(FIRM)提供了一个机会,能够精确界定并消融患者特定的房颤维持机制,而不是试图消除所有可能的房颤触发因素。十多年来,电生理学家们描述了一些病例,其中房颤仅在有限的消融术后就终止了——通常这无法用“随机”蜿蜒小波来解释。事实上,几个实验室最近的研究表明,所有形式的临床房颤通常由稳定的电转子和局灶性源“驱动”,而非多个蜿蜒波。FIRM标测使操作者能够将导管放置在心房中通常1至3个预测部位,通过<5至10分钟的射频消融,终止房颤并可能使其不再能被诱发。现在,几个独立实验室已表明,仅这种FIRM消融就能使>80%的持续性和阵发性房颤患者的房颤终止或显著减慢,并将单次手术消除房颤的成功率从单独肺静脉隔离时的50%提高到>80%。正在进行的研究提示仅FIRM消融,在典型心房扑动观察到的消融时间范围内,可能也能实现这些高成功率,而无需后续触发灶消融。本综述总结了FIRM标测和消融的当前技术水平。