Sommer Philipp, Kircher Simon, Rolf Sascha, John Silke, Arya Arash, Dinov Borislav, Richter Sergio, Bollmann Andreas, Hindricks Gerhard
Department of Electrophysiology, University of Leipzig-Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Mar;27(3):274-80. doi: 10.1111/jce.12874. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
There remains a lack of consensus regarding the ideal ablation strategy for atrial fibrillation (AF), particularly in patients with persistent or longstanding persistent AF. Given increasing evidence from clinical imaging studies that rotors sustain AF, rotor elimination may be a desirable procedural endpoint. However, there is no description to date of the clinical outcomes using rotor elimination during ablation as the procedural endpoint. Moreover, a series of studies question whether procedural AF termination is a desirable endpoint for ablation after many forms of AF ablation.
We report a single-center experience of rotor elimination during AF ablation using Focal Impulse and Rotor Mapping (FIRM), describing 20 consecutive patients with case descriptions of 3 patients with recurrent longstanding persistent AF after prior ablation. In all cases, endocardial mapping using a 64-electrode basket catheter was performed to identify rotors, which were eliminated using radiofrequency catheter ablation. After it was verified that all identified rotors were eliminated, standard ablation consisting of PV isolation was performed. Notably, persistent AF terminated in only 1/20 (5%) patients. However, after a follow-up of 6 months, single-procedure freedom from AF was 80% (16/20 patients) with only 1 patient on antiarrhythmic drugs. All three patients in the highlighted series are AF free despite the lack of acute procedural AF termination.
Patients with persistent AF including those with unsuccessful prior ablation can be treated successfully by rotor targeted ablation, using the elimination of all rotors rather than acute AF termination as the procedural endpoint.
对于心房颤动(AF)的理想消融策略,目前仍缺乏共识,尤其是在持续性或长期持续性AF患者中。鉴于临床影像学研究越来越多的证据表明转子维持房颤,消除转子可能是一个理想的手术终点。然而,迄今为止,尚无关于将消融过程中消除转子作为手术终点的临床结果的描述。此外,一系列研究质疑在多种形式的房颤消融术后,手术性房颤终止是否是一个理想的终点。
我们报告了一项使用局灶性冲动和转子标测(FIRM)在房颤消融期间消除转子的单中心经验,描述了20例连续患者,并对3例先前消融后复发的长期持续性房颤患者进行了病例描述。在所有病例中,使用64电极篮状导管进行心内膜标测以识别转子,并用射频导管消融消除转子。在确认所有识别出的转子均被消除后,进行包括肺静脉隔离在内的标准消融。值得注意的是,仅1/20(5%)的患者持续性房颤终止。然而,随访6个月后,单次手术无房颤率为80%(16/20例患者),只有1例患者使用抗心律失常药物。尽管没有急性手术性房颤终止,但突出系列中的所有3例患者均无房颤。
持续性房颤患者,包括先前消融未成功的患者,可以通过以消除所有转子而非急性房颤终止作为手术终点的转子靶向消融成功治疗。