Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, and the Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Göttingen, Germany, and Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany.
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Feb;79(2):761-769. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26730. Epub 2017 May 11.
To accelerate whole-heart three-dimension MR angiography (MRA) by using a variable-density Poisson-disc undersampling pattern and a compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction algorithm, and compare the results with sensitivity encoding (SENSE).
For whole-heart MRA, a prospective variable-density Poisson-disc k-space undersampling pattern was developed in which 1-2% of central part of k-space was fully sampled, and sampling in the remainder decreased exponentially toward the periphery. The undersampled data were then estimated using CS reconstruction. In patients, images using this sequence with an undersampling rate of ≈6 were compared with those using a SENSE rate of 2 (n = 15) and a SENSE rate of 6 (n = 13).
Compared with SENSE rate 2, CS rate 6 images had similar objective border sharpness, significantly lower subjective image quality scores at all four locations (all P < 0.01), and shorter scan times (P < 0.05). Compared with SENSE rate 6, CS rate 6 had similar objective border sharpness at all four locations, significantly better subjective image quality scores at three of four locations (all P < 0.01), and similar scan times (P = 0.24).
Compared with SENSE with a comparable acceleration rate, a variable-density Poisson-disc undersampling pattern and CS reconstruction achieved better subjective image quality and similar border sharpness. Magn Reson Med 79:761-769, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
使用变密度泊松圆盘欠采样模式和压缩感知(CS)重建算法来加速全心三维磁共振血管造影(MRA),并将结果与敏感度编码(SENSE)进行比较。
对于全心 MRA,开发了一种前瞻性变密度泊松圆盘 k 空间欠采样模式,其中 1-2%的 k 空间中心部分进行完全采样,其余部分的采样沿周边呈指数递减。然后使用 CS 重建来估计欠采样数据。在患者中,使用该序列以 ≈6 的欠采样率与使用 SENSE 率 2(n=15)和 SENSE 率 6(n=13)的图像进行比较。
与 SENSE 率 2 相比,CS 率 6 图像在所有四个位置的客观边界锐度相似,主观图像质量评分显著降低(所有 P<0.01),扫描时间更短(P<0.05)。与 SENSE 率 6 相比,CS 率 6 在所有四个位置的客观边界锐度相似,在三个位置的主观图像质量评分显著提高(所有 P<0.01),扫描时间相似(P=0.24)。
与具有可比加速率的 SENSE 相比,变密度泊松圆盘欠采样模式和 CS 重建可获得更好的主观图像质量和相似的边界锐度。磁共振医学 79:761-769, 2018。© 2017 国际磁共振学会。