Suppr超能文献

一种通过配对的自我和同伴评估使用多源反馈来评估临床前医学生职业素养的新方法。

A Novel Approach to Assessing Professionalism in Preclinical Medical Students Using Multisource Feedback Through Paired Self- and Peer Evaluations.

作者信息

Emke Amanda R, Cheng Steven, Chen Ling, Tian Dajun, Dufault Carolyn

机构信息

a Department of Pediatrics , Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis , Missouri , USA.

b Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Renal Diseases , Washington University School of Medicine , St. Louis , Missouri , USA.

出版信息

Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):402-410. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1306446. Epub 2017 May 12.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Phenomenon: Professionalism is integral to the role of the physician. Most professionalism assessments in medical training are delayed until clinical rotations where multisource feedback is available. This leaves a gap in student assessment portfolios and potentially delays professional development.

APPROACH

A total of 246 second-year medical students (2013-2015) completed self- and peer assessments of professional behaviors in 2 courses following a series of Team-Based Learning exercises. Correlation and regression analyses were used to examine the alignment or misalignment in the relationship between the 2 types of assessments. Four subgroups were formed based on observed patterns of initial self- and peer assessment alignment or misalignment, and subgroup membership stability over time was assessed. A missing data analysis examined differences between average peer assessment scores as a function of selective nonparticipation.

FINDINGS

Spearman correlation demonstrated moderate to strong correlation between self-assessments completed alone (no simultaneous peer assessment) and self-assessments completed at the time of peer assessments (ρ = .59, p < .0001) but weak correlation between the two self-assessments and peer assessments (alone: ρ = .13, p < .013; at time of peer: ρ = .21, p < .0001). Generalized estimating equation models revealed that self-assessments done alone (p < .0001) were a significant predictor of self-assessments done at the time of peer. Course was also a significant predictor (p = .01) of self-assessment scores done at the time of peer. Peer assessment score was not a significant predictor. Bhapkar's test revealed subgroup membership based on the relationship between self- and peer ratings was relatively stable across Time 1 and Time 2 assessments (χ = 0.83, p = .84) for all but one subgroup; members of the subgroup with initially high self-assessment and low peer assessment were significantly more likely to move to a new classification at the second measurement. A missing data analysis revealed that students who completed all self-assessments had significantly higher average peer assessment ratings compared to students who completed one or no self-assessments with a difference of -0.32, 95% confidence interval [-0.48, -0.15]. Insights: Multiple measurements of simultaneous self- and peer assessment identified a subgroup of students who consistently rated themselves higher on professionalism attributes relative to the low ratings given by their peers. This subgroup of preclinical students, along with those who elected to not complete self-assessments, may be at risk for professionalism concerns. Use of this multisource feedback tool to measure perceptual stability of professionalism behaviors is a new approach that may assist with early identification of at-risk students during preclinical years.

摘要

未标注

现象:专业素养是医生角色的重要组成部分。医学培训中的大多数专业素养评估会推迟到临床轮转阶段,此时可获得多源反馈。这在学生评估档案中留下了空白,并可能延迟专业发展。

方法

在一系列基于团队的学习练习之后,共有246名二年级医学生(2013 - 2015年)在两门课程中完成了对专业行为的自我评估和同伴评估。使用相关分析和回归分析来检验两种评估类型之间关系的一致性或不一致性。根据观察到的初始自我评估和同伴评估一致性或不一致性模式形成了四个亚组,并评估了亚组成员随时间的稳定性。缺失数据分析检验了作为选择性不参与函数的平均同伴评估分数之间的差异。

结果

斯皮尔曼相关性表明,单独完成的自我评估(无同时进行的同伴评估)与同伴评估时完成的自我评估之间存在中度至强相关性(ρ = 0.59,p < 0.0001),但两种自我评估与同伴评估之间的相关性较弱(单独时:ρ = 0.13,p < 0.013;同伴评估时:ρ = 0.21,p < 0.0001)。广义估计方程模型显示,单独进行的自我评估(p < 0.0001)是同伴评估时自我评估的显著预测因子。课程也是同伴评估时自我评估分数的显著预测因子(p = 0.01)。同伴评估分数不是显著预测因子。巴普卡尔检验显示,除一个亚组外,基于自我评估和同伴评分之间关系的亚组成员在第一次和第二次评估中相对稳定(χ = 0.83,p = 0.84);初始自我评估高且同伴评估低的亚组成员在第二次测量时更有可能转移到新的分类。缺失数据分析显示,完成所有自我评估的学生的平均同伴评估评分显著高于完成一次或未完成自我评估的学生,差异为 -0.32,95%置信区间[-0.48, -0.15]。见解:同时进行的自我评估和同伴评估的多次测量确定了一个学生亚组,他们在专业素养属性方面给自己的评分始终高于同伴给出的低评分。这一临床前学生亚组以及那些选择不完成自我评估的学生可能存在专业素养方面的问题。使用这种多源反馈工具来测量专业素养行为的感知稳定性是一种新方法,可能有助于在临床前阶段早期识别有风险的学生。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验