Office of Professional and Educational Development, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1B 3V6, Canada.
BMC Med Educ. 2020 Dec 11;20(1):504. doi: 10.1186/s12909-020-02412-x.
Fostering professional behaviour has become increasingly important in medical education and non-traditional approaches to assessment of professionalism may offer a more holistic representation of students' professional behaviour development. Emerging evidence suggests peer assessment may offer potential as an alternative method of professionalism assessment. We introduced peer assessment of professionalism in pre-clerkship phases of undergraduate medical education curriculum at our institution and evaluated suitability of adopting a professional behaviour scale for longitudinal tracking of student development, and student comfort and acceptance of peer assessment.
Peer assessment was introduced using a validated professional behaviours scale. Students conducted repeated, longitudinal assessments of their peers from small-group, clinical skills learning activities. An electronic assessment system was used to collect peer assessments, collate and provide reports to students. Student opinions of peer assessment were initially surveyed before introducing the process, confirmatory analyses were conducted of the adopted scale, and students were surveyed to explore satisfaction with the peer assessment process.
Students across all phases of the curriculum were initially supportive of anonymous peer assessment using small-group learning sessions. Peer scores showed improvement over time, however the magnitude of increase was limited by ceiling effects attributed to the adopted scale. Students agreed that the professional behaviours scale was easy to use and understand, however a majority disagreed that peer assessment improved their understanding of professionalism or was a useful learning experience.
Peer assessment of professional behaviours does expose students to the process of assessing one's peers, however the value of such processes at early stages of medical education may not be fully recognized nor appreciated by students. Electronic means for administering peer assessment is feasible for collecting and reporting peer feedback. Improvement in peer assessed scores was observed over time, however student opinions of the educational value were mixed and indeterminate.
在医学教育中,培养专业行为变得越来越重要,而采用非传统的专业评估方法可能更全面地反映学生的专业行为发展。新出现的证据表明,同伴评估可能是专业评估的一种替代方法。我们在机构的本科医学教育课程的临床前阶段引入了同伴评估专业行为,并评估了采用专业行为量表对学生发展进行纵向跟踪的适宜性,以及学生对同伴评估的舒适度和接受度。
使用经过验证的专业行为量表引入同伴评估。学生从小组临床技能学习活动中对同伴进行重复的、纵向的评估。电子评估系统用于收集同伴评估、整理并向学生提供报告。在引入该过程之前,学生对同伴评估的意见进行了初步调查,对采用的量表进行了确认性分析,并对学生进行了调查,以探讨他们对同伴评估过程的满意度。
课程各阶段的学生最初都支持使用小组学习会议进行匿名同伴评估。同伴评分随着时间的推移而提高,然而,由于采用的量表的上限效应,增加的幅度有限。学生一致认为专业行为量表易于使用和理解,但大多数人不同意同伴评估能提高他们对专业精神的理解,也不认为这是一种有益的学习体验。
同伴评估专业行为确实使学生接触到评估同龄人,然而,在医学教育的早期阶段,这种过程的价值可能没有被学生充分认识到,也没有被他们欣赏。电子方式进行同伴评估是收集和报告同伴反馈的可行方法。随着时间的推移,同伴评估分数有所提高,但学生对教育价值的看法存在分歧且不确定。