• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development of a New Tool for Systematic Observation of Nursing Home Resident and Staff Engagement and Relationship.养老院居民和工作人员参与度和关系的系统观察新工具的开发。
Gerontologist. 2018 Mar 19;58(2):e15-e24. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw255.
2
Impact of Intervention to Improve Nursing Home Resident-Staff Interactions and Engagement.改善养老院居民与工作人员互动和参与的干预措施的影响。
Gerontologist. 2018 Jul 13;58(4):e291-e301. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny039.
3
Daily lives of residents with dementia in nursing homes: development of the Maastricht electronic daily life observation tool.养老院中痴呆症患者的日常生活:马斯特里赫特电子日常生活观察工具的开发
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Aug;28(8):1333-43. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216000478. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
4
A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.一项改善养老院中晚期痴呆症患者生活质量的团体干预措施:Namaste 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(6):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta24060.
5
Development and Psychometric Testing of a Novel Food Service Satisfaction Questionnaire for Food Service Staff of Aged Care Homes.开发和心理计量测试一种新的老年护理院餐饮服务员工餐饮服务满意度问卷。
J Nutr Health Aging. 2018;22(2):205-215. doi: 10.1007/s12603-017-0885-4.
6
The thriving of older people assessment scale: Psychometric evaluation and short-form development.老年人评估量表的发展:心理测量学评估和简式量表的编制。
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Dec;75(12):3831-3843. doi: 10.1111/jan.14180. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
7
Developing the Supporting Choice Observational Tool (SCOT): A Formative Assessment Tool to Assist Nursing Home Staff in Realizing Resident Choice.开发支持性选择观察工具(SCOT):一种形成性评估工具,以协助养老院工作人员实现居民选择。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2017 May 1;10(3):129-138. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20170411-01.
8
Resident-directed long-term care: staff provision of choice during morning care.居民导向的长期护理:晨护期间员工提供选择。
Gerontologist. 2011 Dec;51(6):867-75. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnr066. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
9
Staff experiences with implementing a case conferencing care model in nursing homes: a focus group study.养老院工作人员实施病例会诊护理模式的经验:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4034-0.
10
Assessing quality of life in older adults: psychometric properties of the OPQoL-brief questionnaire in a nursing home population.评估老年人的生活质量:在养老院人群中使用 OPQoL-简明问卷的心理测量特性。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Jan 2;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12955-019-1245-3.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between patient engagement and quality of care interactions among acute care patients with dementia.痴呆急性护理患者的患者参与度与护理质量交互作用的关联。
Geriatr Nurs. 2024 May-Jun;57:117-122. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2024.04.002. Epub 2024 Apr 18.
2
Healthcare Quality Improvement Competency: A Clinical and Training Imperative for Geropsychology.医疗保健质量改进能力:老年心理学的临床和培训要务。
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2021 Dec;28(4):897-908. doi: 10.1007/s10880-021-09824-x. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
3
Development of a Program to Support VA Community Living Centers' Quality Improvement.支持退伍军人事务部社区生活中心质量改进项目的开发。
Fed Pract. 2019 May;36(5):228-231.
4
Is Variation in Resident-Centered Care and Quality Performance Related to Health System Factors in Veterans Health Administration Nursing Homes?以患者为中心的护理及质量绩效的差异与退伍军人健康管理局疗养院的卫生系统因素有关吗?
Inquiry. 2018 Jan-Dec;55:46958018787031. doi: 10.1177/0046958018787031.
5
Impact of Intervention to Improve Nursing Home Resident-Staff Interactions and Engagement.改善养老院居民与工作人员互动和参与的干预措施的影响。
Gerontologist. 2018 Jul 13;58(4):e291-e301. doi: 10.1093/geront/gny039.
6
Applying a Theory-Driven Framework to Guide Quality Improvement Efforts in Nursing Homes: The LOCK Model.运用理论驱动框架指导养老院质量改进工作:LOCK 模型。
Gerontologist. 2018 May 8;58(3):598-605. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnx023.
7
Developing the Supporting Choice Observational Tool (SCOT): A Formative Assessment Tool to Assist Nursing Home Staff in Realizing Resident Choice.开发支持性选择观察工具(SCOT):一种形成性评估工具,以协助养老院工作人员实现居民选择。
Res Gerontol Nurs. 2017 May 1;10(3):129-138. doi: 10.3928/19404921-20170411-01.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptation of a nursing home culture change research instrument for frontline staff quality improvement use.为一线员工质量改进用途改编疗养院文化变革研究工具。
Psychol Serv. 2017 Aug;14(3):337-346. doi: 10.1037/ser0000137.
2
The association between aspects of daily life and quality of life of people with dementia living in long-term care facilities: a momentary assessment study.长期护理机构中痴呆症患者的日常生活各方面与生活质量之间的关联:一项即时评估研究。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Aug;28(8):1323-31. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216000466. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
3
Daily lives of residents with dementia in nursing homes: development of the Maastricht electronic daily life observation tool.养老院中痴呆症患者的日常生活:马斯特里赫特电子日常生活观察工具的开发
Int Psychogeriatr. 2016 Aug;28(8):1333-43. doi: 10.1017/S1041610216000478. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
4
The Impact of Green House Adoption on Medicare Spending and Utilization.采用温室对医疗保险支出和使用的影响。
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):433-53. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12438. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
5
Studying Nursing Home Innovation: The Green House Model of Nursing Home Care.研究养老院创新:养老院护理的“绿屋模式”
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):335-43. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12437. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
6
Sustaining Culture Change: Experiences in the Green House Model.维持文化变革:温室模式中的经验
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):398-417. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12428. Epub 2015 Dec 27.
7
Inside the Green House "Black Box": Opportunities for High-Quality Clinical Decision Making.绿色之家“黑匣子”内部:高质量临床决策的机遇
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):378-97. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12427. Epub 2015 Dec 27.
8
What Health and Aged Care Culture Change Models Mean for Residents and Their Families: A Systematic Review.健康和老年护理文化变革模型对居民及其家属意味着什么:系统评价。
Gerontologist. 2016 Apr;56(2):e12-20. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnv151. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
9
The Green House Model of Nursing Home Care in Design and Implementation.养老院护理的温室模式:设计与实施
Health Serv Res. 2016 Feb;51 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):352-77. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12418. Epub 2015 Nov 25.
10
Caregiver person-centeredness and behavioral symptoms during mealtime interactions: development and feasibility of a coding scheme.进餐互动期间照顾者的以人为本理念与行为症状:一种编码方案的开发与可行性
Geriatr Nurs. 2015 Mar-Apr;36(2 Suppl):S10-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2015.02.018. Epub 2015 Mar 14.

养老院居民和工作人员参与度和关系的系统观察新工具的开发。

Development of a New Tool for Systematic Observation of Nursing Home Resident and Staff Engagement and Relationship.

机构信息

Research & Development, Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center, Alabama.

Alabama Research Institute on Aging and Psychology Department, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 2018 Mar 19;58(2):e15-e24. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnw255.

DOI:10.1093/geront/gnw255
PMID:28499032
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6281332/
Abstract

PURPOSE OF STUDY

To develop a structured observational tool, the Resident-centered Assessment of Interactions with Staff and Engagement tool (RAISE), to measure 2 critical, multi-faceted, organizational-level aspects of person-centered care (PCC) in nursing homes: (a) resident engagement and (b) the quality and frequency of staff-resident interactions.

DESIGN AND METHODS

In this multi-method psychometric development study, we conducted (a) 120 hr of ethnographic observations in one nursing home and (b) a targeted literature review to enable construct development. Two constructs for which no current structured observation measures existed emerged from this phase: nursing home resident-staff engagement and interaction. We developed the preliminary RAISE to measure these constructs and used the tool in 8 nursing homes at an average of 16 times. We conducted 8 iterative psychometric testing and refinement cycles with multi-disciplinary research team members. Each cycle consisted of observations using the draft tool, results review, and tool modification.

RESULTS

The final RAISE included a set of coding rules and procedures enabling simultaneously efficient, non-reactive, and representative quantitative measurement of the interaction and engagement components of nursing home life for staff and residents. It comprised 8 observational variables, each represented by extensive numeric codes. Raters achieved adequate to high reliability with all variables. There is preliminary evidence of face and construct validity via expert panel review.

IMPLICATIONS

The RAISE represents a valuable step forward in the measurement of PCC, providing objective, reliable data based on systematic observation.

摘要

研究目的

开发一种结构化观察工具,即 Resident-centered Assessment of Interactions with Staff and Engagement tool(RAISE),以衡量养老院中以患者为中心的护理(PCC)的两个关键、多方面的组织层面方面:(a)患者参与度和(b)员工与患者互动的质量和频率。

设计和方法

在这项多方法心理测量发展研究中,我们进行了(a)在一家养老院进行了 120 小时的民族志观察,以及(b)有针对性的文献综述,以促进概念的发展。这一阶段出现了两个目前没有结构化观察测量的概念:养老院患者-员工参与度和互动。我们开发了初步的 RAISE 来衡量这些概念,并在 8 家养老院平均使用了 16 次。我们与多学科研究团队成员一起进行了 8 轮迭代的心理测量测试和改进循环。每个周期都包括使用草案工具进行观察、结果审查和工具修改。

结果

最终的 RAISE 包括一套编码规则和程序,使我们能够同时高效、无反应和有代表性地对员工和患者的养老院生活互动和参与部分进行定量测量。它包括 8 个观察变量,每个变量都有广泛的数字代码表示。评分员对所有变量都达到了足够高的可靠性。通过专家小组的审查,初步证明了其具有表面效度和结构效度。

意义

RAISE 在 PCC 的测量方面代表了一个有价值的进步,提供了基于系统观察的客观、可靠的数据。