• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

养老院工作人员实施病例会诊护理模式的经验:一项焦点小组研究。

Staff experiences with implementing a case conferencing care model in nursing homes: a focus group study.

作者信息

Nakrem Sigrid, Stensvik Geir-Tore, Skjong Rickard Johan, Ostaszkiewicz Joan

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), NO-7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Work Environment Unit in Trondheim kommune, Postboks 2300 Torgarden, 7004, Trondheim, Norway.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4034-0.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-019-4034-0
PMID:30917815
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6438011/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A majority of nursing home residents have dementia, and many develop neuropsychiatric symptoms. These symptoms are often caused by neuropathological changes in the brain, but modifiable factors related to quality of care also have an impact. A team-based approach to care that include comprehensive geriatric assessments to facilitate clinical decision-making and structured case conference meetings could improve quality of care and quality of life for the residents. Despite recommendations to adopt this approach, dementia care does not reach standards of evidence-based practice. Better implementation strategies are needed to improve care. A cluster randomised controlled trial with a 12-month intervention was conducted, and the experiences of staff from the intervention nursing homes were explored in a qualitative study after the trial was completed. The aim of the present study was to describe: (i) staff's experiences with the intervention consisting of comprehensive geriatric assessments of nursing home residents and case conferencing, and (ii) enablers and barriers to implementing and sustaining the intervention.

METHODS

Four focus groups with a total of 19 healthcare staff were interviewed, representing four out of eight intervention nursing homes. Thematic content analysis was used to interpret the transcribed data.

RESULTS

Two major themes emerged: 1) learning experiences and 2) enablers and barriers to implementation. The participants had experienced learning both on an organisational level: improvements in care and an organisation that could adjust and facilitate change; and on an individual level: becoming more conscious of residents' needs and acquiring skills in resident assessments. Participants described important enabling factors such as managerial support, drivers for change, and feasibility of the intervention for the local nursing home. Barriers to implementing and sustaining the intervention were time constraints, lack of staff training, unsuitable electronic patient record system for care planning and high complexities of care and instabilities that are present in nursing homes.

CONCLUSIONS

Quality improvements in nursing homes are difficult to sustain. In order to offer residents high quality of care that meet their individual needs, it is important for management and nursing home staff to be aware of and understand factors that enable or constrain change.

摘要

背景

大多数养老院居民患有痴呆症,许多人还会出现神经精神症状。这些症状通常由大脑的神经病理变化引起,但与护理质量相关的可改变因素也有影响。一种以团队为基础的护理方法,包括进行全面的老年评估以促进临床决策以及组织结构化的病例讨论会,可能会提高居民的护理质量和生活质量。尽管有建议采用这种方法,但痴呆症护理并未达到循证实践的标准。需要更好的实施策略来改善护理。开展了一项为期12个月干预的整群随机对照试验,并在试验完成后通过定性研究探索了干预养老院工作人员的经验。本研究的目的是描述:(i)工作人员对由养老院居民全面老年评估和病例讨论组成的干预措施的体验,以及(ii)实施和维持该干预措施的促进因素和障碍。

方法

对来自八个干预养老院中的四个养老院的总共19名医护人员进行了四个焦点小组访谈。采用主题内容分析法对转录数据进行解读。

结果

出现了两个主要主题:1)学习体验和2)实施的促进因素和障碍。参与者在组织层面都有学习体验:护理方面的改善以及一个能够调整并促进变革的组织;在个人层面:更加意识到居民的需求并获得居民评估技能。参与者描述了重要的促进因素,如管理支持、变革驱动因素以及该干预措施对当地养老院的可行性。实施和维持该干预措施的障碍包括时间限制、缺乏工作人员培训、用于护理计划的电子病历系统不合适以及养老院护理的高度复杂性和不稳定性。

结论

养老院的质量改进难以持续。为了为居民提供满足其个人需求的高质量护理,管理层和养老院工作人员意识到并理解促成或限制变革的因素非常重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c6/6438011/ec151a18cb57/12913_2019_4034_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c6/6438011/ec151a18cb57/12913_2019_4034_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c6/6438011/ec151a18cb57/12913_2019_4034_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Staff experiences with implementing a case conferencing care model in nursing homes: a focus group study.养老院工作人员实施病例会诊护理模式的经验:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Mar 27;19(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4034-0.
2
Aged care clinical mentoring model of change in nursing homes in China: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial.中国养老院老年护理临床指导变革模式:一项整群随机对照试验的研究方案
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 25;18(1):816. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3596-6.
3
Shared decision-making in dementia care planning: barriers and facilitators in two European countries.痴呆症护理规划中的共同决策:两个欧洲国家的障碍与促进因素
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Jan;21(1):31-39. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1255715. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
4
Ethical challenges in nursing homes--staff's opinions and experiences with systematic ethics meetings with participation of residents' relatives.养老院中的伦理挑战——工作人员对居民亲属参与的系统性伦理会议的看法和经历
Scand J Caring Sci. 2015 Dec;29(4):810-23. doi: 10.1111/scs.12213. Epub 2015 Apr 28.
5
A facilitated approach to family case conferencing for people with advanced dementia living in nursing homes: perceptions of palliative care planning coordinators and other health professionals in the IDEAL study.一种促进机构内居住的晚期痴呆症患者家庭病例会议的方法:IDEAL 研究中姑息治疗计划协调员和其他卫生专业人员的看法。
Int Psychogeriatr. 2017 Oct;29(10):1713-1722. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000977. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
6
Barriers to and facilitators for implementing quality improvements in palliative care - results from a qualitative interview study in Norway.挪威一项质性访谈研究的结果:姑息治疗质量改进的障碍与促进因素
BMC Palliat Care. 2016 Jul 15;15:61. doi: 10.1186/s12904-016-0132-5.
7
TIME to reduce agitation in persons with dementia in nursing homes. A process evaluation of a complex intervention.是时候减少养老院中痴呆症患者的躁动了。一项复杂干预措施的过程评估。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 May 31;19(1):349. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4168-0.
8
The short-term effect of a modified comprehensive geriatric assessment and regularly case conferencing on neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing homes: a cluster randomized trial.养老院中经过改良的综合老年评估和定期病例会诊对神经精神症状的短期影响:一项集群随机试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 11;22(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02976-x.
9
Professional pride: A qualitative descriptive study of nursing home staff's experiences of how a quality development project influenced their work.职业自豪感:一项定性描述性研究,探讨养老院工作人员在质量发展项目影响下的工作体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2019 Aug;28(15-16):2760-2768. doi: 10.1111/jocn.14884. Epub 2019 May 13.
10
Improving person-centred care in nursing homes through dementia-care mapping: design of a cluster-randomised controlled trial.通过痴呆症关怀映射提高养老院的以人为主的关怀:一项集群随机对照试验的设计。
BMC Geriatr. 2012 Jan 3;12:1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2318-12-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptualizing the learning organization in nursing homes: a scoping review.疗养院中学习型组织的概念化:一项范围综述
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Apr 30;25(1):621. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12674-0.
2
Developing a set of key principles for care planning within older adult care homes: study protocol for a modified Delphi survey.制定一套老年护理院护理计划的关键原则:一项改良德尔菲调查的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jan 28;15(1):e090243. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-090243.
3
Exploring the implementation of multidisciplinary collaboration at nursing homes in Jakarta, Indonesia: A descriptive phenomenological study.

本文引用的文献

1
Implementing Frontline Worker-Led Quality Improvement in Nursing Homes: Getting to "How".在养老院实施一线工作人员主导的质量改进:落实“如何做”。
Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf. 2018 Sep;44(9):526-535. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Jul 7.
2
Experiences of nursing home staff using the targeted interdisciplinary model for evaluation and treatment of neuropsychiatric symptoms (TIME) - a qualitative study.养老院工作人员使用针对神经精神症状评估和治疗的跨学科目标模型(TIME)的体验 - 一项定性研究。
Aging Ment Health. 2019 Aug;23(8):966-975. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2018.1464116. Epub 2018 Apr 19.
3
Disability in long-term care residents explained by prevalent geriatric syndromes, not long-term care home characteristics: a cross-sectional study.
探索印度尼西亚雅加达养老院多学科协作的实施情况:一项描述性现象学研究。
Belitung Nurs J. 2024 Jun 28;10(3):332-340. doi: 10.33546/bnj.3226. eCollection 2024.
4
Factors that influence the implementation of innovation in aged care: a scoping review.影响老年护理创新实施的因素:一项范围综述
JBI Evid Implement. 2023 Dec 29;22(1):61-80. doi: 10.1097/XEB.0000000000000407.
5
The short-term effect of a modified comprehensive geriatric assessment and regularly case conferencing on neuropsychiatric symptoms in nursing homes: a cluster randomized trial.养老院中经过改良的综合老年评估和定期病例会诊对神经精神症状的短期影响:一项集群随机试验。
BMC Geriatr. 2022 Apr 11;22(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s12877-022-02976-x.
6
Types of implementation of the dementia-specific case conference concept WELCOME-IdA in nursing homes: a qualitative process evaluation of the FallDem effectiveness trial.养老院中痴呆症特定病例讨论会概念WELCOME-IdA的实施类型:FallDem有效性试验的定性过程评估
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Aug 18;2(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00191-0.
7
'Traversing difficult terrain'. Advance care planning in residential aged care through multidisciplinary case conferences: A qualitative interview study exploring the experiences of families, staff and health professionals.“穿越艰难地形”。通过多学科病例会议在老年护理机构中进行预先护理规划:一项质性访谈研究,探索家庭、工作人员和健康专业人员的经历。
Palliat Med. 2021 Jun;35(6):1148-1157. doi: 10.1177/02692163211013250. Epub 2021 May 21.
老年常见综合征而非长期护理机构特征可解释长期护理机构居民的残疾情况:一项横断面研究
BMC Geriatr. 2017 Feb 10;17(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12877-017-0444-1.
4
Three Decades of Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment: Evidence Coming From Different Healthcare Settings and Specific Clinical Conditions.三十年的综合老年评估:来自不同医疗环境和特定临床状况的证据
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017 Feb 1;18(2):192.e1-192.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2016.11.004. Epub 2016 Dec 31.
5
The Interactive Relationship between Pain, Psychosis, and Agitation in People with Dementia: Results from a Cluster-Randomised Clinical Trial.痴呆患者疼痛、精神病和激越之间的交互关系:一项整群随机临床试验的结果
Behav Neurol. 2016;2016:7036415. doi: 10.1155/2016/7036415. Epub 2016 May 9.
6
Understanding organizational and cultural premises for quality of care in nursing homes: an ethnographic study.理解养老院护理质量的组织和文化前提:一项人种志研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Nov 13;15:508. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1171-y.
7
An introduction to implementation science for the non-specialist.非专业人士实施科学概论。
BMC Psychol. 2015 Sep 16;3(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40359-015-0089-9.
8
Prevalence and Severity of Dementia in Nursing Home Residents.养老院居民中痴呆症的患病率和严重程度。
Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2015;40(3-4):166-77. doi: 10.1159/000433525. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
9
Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice.针对实践决定因素的量身定制干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 29;2015(4):CD005470. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005470.pub3.
10
Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks.理解实施理论、模型和框架。
Implement Sci. 2015 Apr 21;10:53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0242-0.