• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[卫生服务研究中的小组讨论 - 第1部分:方法选择与规划的介绍及审议]

[Group Discussions in Health Services Research - Part 1: Introduction and Deliberations on Selection of Method and Planning].

作者信息

Pohontsch Nadine Janis, Müller Veronika, Brandner Susanne, Karlheim Christoph, Jünger Saskia, Klindtworth Katharina, Stamer Maren, Höfling-Engels Nicole, Kleineke Vera, Brandt Benigna, Xyländer Margret, Patzelt Christiane, Meyer Thorsten

机构信息

Institut Für Allgemeinmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg.

Studiengang Physiotherapie DUAL, Hochschule 21, Buxtehude.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Oct;80(10):864-870. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-104379. Epub 2017 May 12.

DOI:10.1055/s-0043-104379
PMID:28499321
Abstract

Health services researchers focus on the players, structures and impact of health care in "real life". They investigate how social aspects, financing, organizational structures, technologies and personal attitudes affect the process and outcomes of health care. Qualitative research methods are used here, which address how people act according to their unique living conditions (outside the context of experimental studies). Different methods of debriefing groups are essential for qualitative health services research. In 2 subsequent articles, we aim to outline the diverse facets and possible range of implementation of the above-mentioned methods, in order to highlight the potential of debriefing groups in health services research (focus groups or group discussions) using these methods. In the current article, we would like to encourage researchers to reflect on relevant topics such as the selection of an appropriate method, the planning and undertaking of investigations including sampling methods, and questions regarding ethics and privacy. A follow-up article (in preparation) will deal with theoretical considerations of the term "group", as well as with the process of moderating discussions, methods of analyzing data and (qualitative) online research.

摘要

卫生服务研究人员关注“现实生活”中医疗保健的参与者、结构及其影响。他们研究社会因素、融资、组织结构、技术以及个人态度如何影响医疗保健的过程和结果。这里使用定性研究方法,该方法关注人们如何根据其独特的生活条件行事(在实验研究背景之外)。不同的汇报小组方法对于定性卫生服务研究至关重要。在随后的两篇文章中,我们旨在概述上述方法的不同方面以及可能的实施范围,以突出使用这些方法的汇报小组(焦点小组或小组讨论)在卫生服务研究中的潜力。在当前文章中,我们希望鼓励研究人员思考相关主题,如选择合适的方法、包括抽样方法在内的调查规划与开展,以及伦理和隐私问题。后续文章(正在准备中)将探讨“小组”一词的理论考量,以及讨论主持过程、数据分析方法和(定性)在线研究。

相似文献

1
[Group Discussions in Health Services Research - Part 1: Introduction and Deliberations on Selection of Method and Planning].[卫生服务研究中的小组讨论 - 第1部分:方法选择与规划的介绍及审议]
Gesundheitswesen. 2018 Oct;80(10):864-870. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-104379. Epub 2017 May 12.
2
Literature review: considerations in undertaking focus group research with culturally and linguistically diverse groups.文献综述:针对文化和语言背景各异群体开展焦点小组研究的注意事项
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Jun;16(6):1000-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01760.x.
3
[Group Discussions in Health Services Research - Part 2: Reflections on The Concept of Group, Moderation and Analysis of Group Discussions as well as Online Group Discussion].[卫生服务研究中的小组讨论 - 第2部分:关于小组概念、小组讨论的主持与分析以及在线小组讨论的思考]
Gesundheitswesen. 2020 Dec;82(12):998-1007. doi: 10.1055/a-0882-6325. Epub 2019 May 24.
4
The study of client-provider interactions: a review of methodological issues.医患互动研究:方法学问题综述
Stud Fam Plann. 1994 Jan-Feb;25(1):1-17.
5
[Qualitative Research in Health Services Research - Discussion Paper, Part 3: Quality of Qualitative Research].[卫生服务研究中的定性研究——讨论文件,第3部分:定性研究的质量]
Gesundheitswesen. 2015 Dec;77(12):966-75. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1565235. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
6
Qualitative Research in Emergency Care Part I: Research Principles and Common Applications.急诊护理中的定性研究 第一部分:研究原则与常见应用
Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;22(9):1096-102. doi: 10.1111/acem.12736. Epub 2015 Aug 18.
7
How to conduct focus groups: researching group priorities through discussion.如何开展焦点小组讨论:通过讨论研究群体优先事项。
Dev Commun Rep. 1992(77):5.
8
Future directions for family planning operations research: towards a greater appreciation of psychosocial issues.计划生育运筹学的未来发展方向:更加重视心理社会问题。
Adv Popul. 1994;2:141-69.
9
Focus group interviews: a guide for palliative care researchers and clinicians.焦点小组访谈:姑息治疗研究人员和临床医生指南
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2003 May;9(5):202-7. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2003.9.5.11490.
10
[Qualitative research in health services research - discussion paper, Part 2: Qualitative research in health services research in Germany - an overview].[卫生服务研究中的定性研究——讨论文件,第2部分:德国卫生服务研究中的定性研究——概述]
Gesundheitswesen. 2012 Aug;74(8-9):516-25. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1323694. Epub 2012 Aug 31.

引用本文的文献

1
[Development and evaluation of an assessment tool for organisational health literacy].[组织健康素养评估工具的开发与评价]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2025 Mar;68(3):274-281. doi: 10.1007/s00103-025-04018-4. Epub 2025 Feb 13.
2
Integrating general practitioners' and patients' perspectives in the development of a digital tool supporting primary care for older patients with multimorbidity: a focus group study.在开发支持患有多种疾病的老年患者初级保健的数字工具过程中整合全科医生和患者的观点:一项焦点小组研究
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jan 21;7:1499333. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1499333. eCollection 2025.
3
Community pharmacists' perceptions of their challenges in relation to older adults prescribed psychotropic medications: a focus-group study.
社区药剂师对为老年人开具精神药物处方所面临挑战的看法:一项焦点小组研究。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2024 Dec 31. doi: 10.1007/s11096-024-01856-1.
4
Challenges of regional hospice and palliative care networks: A group discussion study with coordinators and network experts.地区临终关怀与姑息治疗网络面临的挑战:一项与协调员和网络专家的小组讨论研究
Palliat Med. 2025 Feb;39(2):256-265. doi: 10.1177/02692163241303281. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
5
Perspective on patient-centered communication: a focus group study investigating the experiences and needs of nursing professionals.以患者为中心的沟通视角:一项聚焦小组研究,调查护理专业人员的经验和需求。
BMC Nurs. 2024 Nov 12;23(1):822. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02487-7.
6
[DNVF Memorandum: Objectives and Methods of Physical Activity-Related Health Services Research].[糖尿病神经病变随访备忘录:与体育活动相关的健康服务研究的目标和方法]
Gesundheitswesen. 2024 Jul 24;86(10):655-80. doi: 10.1055/a-2340-1669.
7
What does "urgency" mean when prioritizing cancer treatment? Results from a qualitative study with German oncologists and other experts during the COVID-19 pandemic.在优先考虑癌症治疗时,“紧迫性”意味着什么?在 COVID-19 大流行期间,德国肿瘤学家和其他专家进行的定性研究结果。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2024 Jul 15;150(7):352. doi: 10.1007/s00432-024-05863-7.
8
Multi-staged development and pilot testing of a self-assessment tool for organizational health literacy.多阶段开发和试点测试组织健康素养自我评估工具。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 13;23(1):1407. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10448-0.
9
State-wide implementation of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in specialized outpatient palliative care teams (ELSAH): A mixed-methods evaluation and implications for their sustainable use.全州范围内在专科门诊姑息治疗团队中实施患者报告结局测量(PROMs)(ELSAH):一项混合方法评估及其对可持续使用的影响。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 Dec 2;21(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-01109-w.
10
Interprofessional collaboration to support patients with social problems in general practice-a qualitative focus group study.跨专业合作以支持基层医疗中存在社会问题的患者:一项定性焦点小组研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jul 4;23(1):169. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01782-z.