Miner Michael H, Raymond Nancy, Coleman Eli, Swinburne Romine Rebecca
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Department of Psychiatry, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
J Sex Med. 2017 May;14(5):715-720. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2017.03.255.
One of the major obstacles to conducting epidemiologic research and determining the incidence and prevalence of compulsive sexual behavior (CSB) has been the lack of relevant empirically derived cut points on the various instruments that have been used to measure the concept.
To further develop the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Inventory (CSBI) through exploring predictive validity and developing an empirically determined and clinically useful cut point for defining CSB.
A sample of 242 men who have sex with men was recruited from various sites in a moderate-size Midwestern city. Participants were assigned to a CSB group or a control group using an interview for the diagnosis that was patterned after the Structured Clinical Interview for the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition. The 22-item CSBI was administered as part of a larger battery of self-report inventories.
Receiver operating characteristic analyses were used to compute area-under-the-curve measurements to ascertain the predictive validity of the total scale, the control subscale, and the violence subscale. Cut points were determined through consensus of experts balancing sensitivity and specificity as determined by receiver operating characteristic curves.
Analyses indicated that the 22-item CSBI was a good predictor of group membership, as was the 13-item control subscale. The violence subscale added little to the predictive accuracy of the instrument; thus, it likely measures something other than CSB. Two relevant cut points were found, one that minimized false negatives and another, more conservative cut point that minimized false positives.
The CSBI as currently configured measures two different constructions and only the control subscale is helpful in diagnosing CSB. Therefore, we decided to eliminate the violence subscale and move forward with a 13-item scale that we have named the CSBI-13. Two cut points were developed from this revised scale, one that is useful as a clinical screening tool and the other, more conservative measurement that is useful for etiologic and epidemiologic research. Miner MH, Raymond N, Coleman E, Swinburne Romine R. Investigating Clinically and Scientifically Useful Cut Points on the Compulsive Sexual Behavior Inventory. J Sex Med 2017;14:715-720.
开展流行病学研究以及确定强迫性行为(CSB)的发病率和患病率的主要障碍之一,是在用于测量该概念的各种工具上缺乏相关的实证得出的临界点。
通过探索预测效度并制定一个基于实证且对临床有用的临界点来定义CSB,进一步开发强迫性行为量表(CSBI)。
从美国中西部一个中等规模城市的不同地点招募了242名男男性行为者作为样本。使用一种仿照《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版结构化临床访谈的诊断性访谈,将参与者分为CSB组或对照组。22项的CSBI作为一整套更大的自我报告量表的一部分进行施测。
采用受试者工作特征分析来计算曲线下面积测量值,以确定总量表、控制分量表和暴力分量表的预测效度。通过专家共识确定临界点,平衡受试者工作特征曲线所确定的敏感性和特异性。
分析表明,22项的CSBI是组成员身份的良好预测指标,13项的控制分量表也是如此。暴力分量表对该工具的预测准确性几乎没有增加;因此,它可能测量的是CSB以外的东西。发现了两个相关的临界点,一个将假阴性降至最低,另一个更保守的临界点将假阳性降至最低。
目前配置的CSBI测量的是两种不同的结构,只有控制分量表有助于诊断CSB。因此,我们决定删除暴力分量表,推进使用一个我们命名为CSBI - 13的13项量表。从这个修订后的量表中得出了两个临界点,一个用作临床筛查工具,另一个更保守的测量方法对病因学和流行病学研究有用。Miner MH,Raymond N,Coleman E,Swinburne Romine R。研究强迫性行为量表上临床和科学有用的临界点。《性医学杂志》2017;14:715 - 720。