Carda Stefano, Biasiucci Andrea, Maesani Andrea, Ionta Silvio, Moncharmont Julien, Clarke Stephanie, Murray Micah M, Millán José Del R
Neuropsychology and Neurorehabilitation Service, University Hospital Center and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Intento SA, Ecublens, Switzerland.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug;98(8):1628-1635.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 May 9.
To evaluate the effects of electrically assisted movement therapy (EAMT) in which patients use functional electrical stimulation, modulated by a custom device controlled through the patient's unaffected hand, to produce or assist task-specific upper limb movements, which enables them to engage in intensive goal-oriented training.
Randomized, crossover, assessor-blinded, 5-week trial with follow-up at 18 weeks.
Rehabilitation university hospital.
Patients with chronic, severe stroke (N=11; mean age, 47.9y) more than 6 months poststroke (mean time since event, 46.3mo).
Both EAMT and the control intervention (dose-matched, goal-oriented standard care) consisted of 10 sessions of 90 minutes per day, 5 sessions per week, for 2 weeks. After the first 10 sessions, group allocation was crossed over, and patients received a 1-week therapy break before receiving the new treatment.
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment for the Upper Extremity, Wolf Motor Function Test, spasticity, and 28-item Motor Activity Log.
Forty-four individuals were recruited, of whom 11 were eligible and participated. Five patients received the experimental treatment before standard care, and 6 received standard care before the experimental treatment. EAMT produced higher improvements in the Fugl-Meyer scale than standard care (P<.05). Median improvements were 6.5 Fugl-Meyer points and 1 Fugl-Meyer point after the experimental treatment and standard care, respectively. The improvement was also significant in subjective reports of quality of movement and amount of use of the affected limb during activities of daily living (P<.05).
EAMT produces a clinically important impairment reduction in stroke patients with chronic, severe upper limb paresis.
评估电辅助运动疗法(EAMT)的效果,即患者使用功能性电刺激,通过由患者未受影响的手控制的定制设备进行调节,以产生或辅助特定任务的上肢运动,从而使他们能够参与强化的目标导向训练。
随机、交叉、评估者盲法、为期5周的试验,并在18周时进行随访。
康复大学医院。
慢性重度中风患者(N = 11;平均年龄47.9岁),中风后超过6个月(自发病以来的平均时间为46.3个月)。
EAMT和对照干预(剂量匹配、目标导向的标准护理)均包括每天10次、每次90分钟的治疗,每周5次,共2周。在前10次治疗后,进行组间交叉,患者在接受新治疗前有1周的治疗休息期。
上肢Fugl - Meyer运动评估、Wolf运动功能测试、痉挛程度以及28项运动活动日志。
共招募了44人,其中11人符合条件并参与。5名患者在接受标准护理前接受了实验性治疗,6名患者在接受实验性治疗前接受了标准护理。与标准护理相比,EAMT在Fugl - Meyer量表上产生了更高的改善(P <.05)。实验性治疗和标准护理后,Fugl - Meyer评分的中位数改善分别为6.5分和1分。在日常生活活动中,受影响肢体的运动质量和使用量的主观报告中,改善也具有显著性(P <.05)。
EAMT可使慢性重度上肢麻痹的中风患者的临床损伤得到显著减轻。