Chang Angela T, Gavaghan Belinda, O'Leary Shaun, McBride Liza-Jane, Raymer Maree
Department of Physiotherapy, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Level 2, Ned Hanlon Building, Butterfield Street, Herston, Qld 4029, Australia. Email.
Allied Health Professions' Office of Queensland, Clinical Excellence Division Department of Health, Queensland Government, Level 1, 15 Butterfield Street, Herston, Qld 4006, Australia. Emails:.
Aust Health Rev. 2018 Jun;42(3):334-339. doi: 10.1071/AH16222.
Objective The aim of the present study was to determine the rates of re-referral to specialist out-patient clinics for patients previously managed and discharged from an advanced practice physiotherapy-led service in three metropolitan hospitals. Methods A retrospective audit was undertaken of 462 patient cases with non-urgent musculoskeletal conditions discharged between 1 April 2014 and 30 March 2015 from three metropolitan hospitals. These patients had been discharged from the physiotherapy-led service without requiring specialist medical review. Rates and patterns of re-referral to specialist orthopaedic, neurosurgical, chronic pain, or rheumatology services within 12 months of discharge were investigated. Results Forty-six of the 462 patients (10.0%) who were managed by the physiotherapy-led service were re-referred to specialist medical orthopaedic, neurosurgical, chronic pain or rheumatology departments within 12 months of discharge. Only 22 of these patients (4.8%) were re-referred for the same condition as managed previously and discharged. Conclusions Ninety-five per cent of patients with non-urgent musculoskeletal conditions managed by an advanced practice physiotherapy-led service at three metropolitan hospitals did not re-present to access public specialist medical services for the same condition within 12 months of discharge. This is the first time that re-presentation rates have been reported for patients managed in advanced practice physiotherapy services and the findings support the effectiveness of these models of care in managing demand for speciality out-patient services. What is known about the topic? Advanced practice physiotherapy-led services have been implemented to address the needs of patients referred with non-urgent musculoskeletal conditions to hospital specialist out-patient services. Although this model is widely used in Australia, there has been very little information about whether patients managed in these services subsequently re-present for further specialist medical care. What does this paper add? This paper identifies that the majority (95%) of patients managed by an advanced practice physiotherapy-led service did not re-present for further medical care for the same condition within 12 months of discharge. What are the implications for practitioners? This paper supports the use of advanced practice physiotherapy-led services in the management of overburdened neurosurgical and orthopaedic specialist out-patient waiting lists.
目的 本研究旨在确定此前在三家大都市医院由高级实践物理治疗主导的服务机构接受治疗并出院的患者再次转诊至专科门诊的比例。方法 对2014年4月1日至2015年3月31日期间从三家大都市医院出院的462例非紧急肌肉骨骼疾病患者进行回顾性审计。这些患者已从物理治疗主导的服务机构出院,无需专科医学复查。调查了出院后12个月内再次转诊至骨科、神经外科、慢性疼痛或风湿病专科服务的比例和模式。结果 在由物理治疗主导的服务机构治疗的462例患者中,有46例(10.0%)在出院后12个月内再次转诊至骨科、神经外科、慢性疼痛或风湿病专科。其中只有22例(4.8%)因与之前治疗并出院时相同的病情再次转诊。结论 在三家大都市医院由高级实践物理治疗主导的服务机构治疗的非紧急肌肉骨骼疾病患者中,95%在出院后12个月内未因相同病情再次寻求公共专科医疗服务。这是首次报告在高级实践物理治疗服务中接受治疗的患者的再次就诊率,研究结果支持了这些护理模式在管理专科门诊服务需求方面的有效性。关于该主题已知的信息有哪些?已实施由高级实践物理治疗主导的服务,以满足转诊至医院专科门诊的非紧急肌肉骨骼疾病患者的需求。尽管该模式在澳大利亚广泛使用,但关于在这些服务中接受治疗的患者随后是否会再次寻求进一步专科医疗护理的信息非常少。本文补充了什么内容?本文指出,由高级实践物理治疗主导的服务机构治疗的大多数患者(95%)在出院后12个月内未因相同病情再次寻求进一步医疗护理。对从业者有何启示?本文支持在管理负担过重的神经外科和骨科专科门诊候诊名单时使用由高级实践物理治疗主导的服务。