Department of Pediatric Dentistry and Community Dentistry, Case Western Reserve University School of Dental Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Psychology, Western New England University, Springfield, MA, USA.
J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2017 Jun;17(2):71-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jebdp.2017.03.008. Epub 2017 Mar 18.
Current evidence pertaining to the effectiveness of flossing and caries prevention is potentially being misinterpreted by health oversight bodies, which may have significant implications for current and future public flossing guidelines. We identify and discuss several methodological deficiencies, including the lack of validated measures of flossing skill, over-reliance on self-reported flossing behavior, and the lack of current guidelines on how to interpret and apply evidence-based findings to specific clinical scenarios that are present in the studies of flossing effectiveness included in the Cochrane Review. As such, we argue that it is premature for health oversight bodies to conclude that flossing is ineffective in the prevention of dental caries. Our research group, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH), is developing a valid and reliable provider-observed measure of tooth brushing and flossing skill that may help promote higher quality flossing evidence in the future.
当前有关牙线洁牙和龋齿预防效果的证据可能被健康监督机构误解,这可能对当前和未来的公众牙线使用指南产生重大影响。我们发现并讨论了几个方法学缺陷,包括缺乏经过验证的牙线使用技能衡量标准、过度依赖自我报告的牙线使用行为,以及目前缺乏如何解释和将循证发现应用于特定临床情况的指南,这些问题都存在于 Cochrane 综述中包含的牙线有效性研究中。因此,我们认为健康监督机构得出牙线在预防龋齿方面无效的结论还为时过早。我们的研究小组由美国国立卫生研究院 (NIH) 资助,正在开发一种经过验证的、可靠的由提供者观察的牙齿刷牙和牙线使用技能衡量标准,这可能有助于未来提供更高质量的牙线使用证据。