Wang Maojing, Zhao Qing, Ding Wei, Cai Shanglang
Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao City, Shandong Province, China.
Department of Cardiology, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao City, Shandong Province, China.
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Jun 15;119(12):1997-2002. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.027. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
Use of the antiarrhythmic ibutilide after isolated pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) might distinguish atrial remodeling severity and cases requiring further substrate modification, thereby improving efficacy of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment. Ninety-six consecutive patients with persistent AF were randomized after PVI to either direct current synchronized cardioversion (DCC group, n = 48) or 1 mg of intravenous ibutilide (ibutilide group, n = 48) followed by no further intervention if AF converted to sinus rhythm (SR) within 30 minutes (ibutilide conversion subgroup) or by complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation until SR recovery or complete CFAE elimination (ibutilide nonconversion subgroup). With similarly distributed baseline characteristics and no serious postablation complications, the primary end point of 12-month SR maintenance rate after PVI was significantly higher for ibutilide versus the DCC group before (75% vs 56%; p = 0.042) or after (83% vs 60%; p = 0.011) reablation at physician's discretion for recurrence beyond 3 months after PVI. After ibutilide administration, 21 of 48 patients (44%) converted to SR at 17 ± 8 minutes (mean ± SD); those in the ibutilide nonconversion subgroup had larger atrial size (47 ± 4 vs 45 ± 4; p = 0.025) and CFAE area (29 ± 8 vs 12 ± 5; p = 0.001) and longer AF duration (27 ± 6 vs 21 ± 10; p = 0.026). Among ibutilide conversion and nonconversion subgroups and DCC group, procedure, ablation, and x-ray exposure times differed significantly, as did 12-month SR maintenance rate before (81% vs 70% vs 56%; p = 0.043) or after reablation (86% vs 81% vs 60%; p = 0.042). In conclusion, in persistent AF treatment, ibutilide-guided ablation after PVI yields higher 1-year SR maintenance rate than PVI only.
在孤立肺静脉隔离(PVI)后使用抗心律失常药物伊布利特,可能有助于区分心房重构的严重程度以及需要进一步进行基质改良的病例,从而提高持续性房颤(AF)的治疗效果。96例持续性房颤患者在PVI后被随机分为两组,一组接受直流电同步心脏复律(DCC组,n = 48),另一组静脉注射1 mg伊布利特(伊布利特组,n = 48)。若房颤在30分钟内转为窦性心律(SR)(伊布利特转复亚组),则不再进行进一步干预;若未转复,则进行碎裂心房电图(CFAE)消融,直至恢复SR或完全消除CFAE(伊布利特未转复亚组)。两组患者的基线特征分布相似,且消融后均无严重并发症。在PVI后12个月的SR维持率这一主要终点指标上,伊布利特组显著高于DCC组,无论是在医生根据患者房颤复发情况决定再次消融前(75% 对56%;p = 0.042)还是再次消融后(83% 对60%;p = 0.011)。静脉注射伊布利特后,48例患者中有21例(44%)在17±8分钟(均值±标准差)转为SR;伊布利特未转复亚组患者的心房更大(47±4对45±4;p = 0.025)、CFAE面积更大(29±8对12±5;p = 0.001)且房颤持续时间更长(27±6对21±10;p = 0.026)。在伊布利特转复亚组、未转复亚组和DCC组中(无论是在再次消融前还是再次消融后),手术、消融及X线暴露时间均有显著差异,12个月的SR维持率也存在显著差异(再次消融前:81%对70%对56%;p = 0.043;再次消融后:86%对81%对60%;p = 0.042)。总之,在持续性房颤治疗中,PVI后采用伊布利特指导下的消融术,其1年SR维持率高于单纯PVI。