Spectrometry, Sample Preparation and Mechanization Group - GEPAM, Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil; National Institute of Science and Technology for Bioanalytics, Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas - UNICAMP, Campinas, Brazil.
Group for Instrumentation and Automation in Analytical Chemistry - GIA Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas - UNICAMP.
Talanta. 2017 Aug 1;170:199-209. doi: 10.1016/j.talanta.2017.03.091. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
The efficiency of three different depletion methods to remove the most abundant proteins, enriching those human serum proteins with low abundance is checked to make more efficient the search and discovery of biomarkers. These methods utilize magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs), chemical reagents (sequential application of dithiothreitol and acetonitrile, DTT/ACN), and commercial apparatus based on immunoaffinity (ProteoMiner, PM). The comparison between methods shows significant removal of abundant protein, remaining in the supernatant at concentrations of 4.6±0.2, 3.6±0.1, and 3.3±0.2µgµL (n=3) for MNPs, DTT/ACN and PM respectively, from a total protein content of 54µgµL. Using GeLC-MS/MS analysis, MNPs depletion shows good efficiency in removing high molecular weight proteins (>80kDa). Due to the synergic effect between the reagents DTT and ACN, DTT/ACN-based depletion offers good performance in the depletion of thiol-rich proteins, such as albumin and transferrin (DTT action), as well as of high molecular weight proteins (ACN action). Furthermore, PM equalization confirms its efficiency in concentrating low-abundant proteins, decreasing the dynamic range of protein levels in human serum. Direct comparison between the treatments reveals 72 proteins identified when using MNP depletion (43 of them exclusively by this method), but only 20 proteins using DTT/ACN (seven exclusively by this method). Additionally, after PM treatment 30 proteins were identified, seven exclusively by this method. Thus, MNPs and DTT/ACN depletion can be simple, quick, cheap, and robust alternatives for immunochemistry-based protein depletion, providing a potential strategy in the search for disease biomarkers.
三种不同的耗竭方法(利用磁性纳米颗粒[MNPs]、化学试剂(二硫苏糖醇和乙腈的顺序应用,DTT/ACN)和商业免疫亲和法设备[ProteoMiner,PM])被用来去除最丰富的蛋白质,以提高低丰度人类血清蛋白的富集效率,从而更有效地寻找和发现生物标志物。该方法比较了不同方法的效果,发现 MNPs、DTT/ACN 和 PM 分别能有效地去除丰度较高的蛋白质,使上清液中剩余的蛋白质浓度分别为 4.6±0.2、3.6±0.1 和 3.3±0.2µgµL(n=3),而总蛋白含量为 54µgµL。使用 GeLC-MS/MS 分析,MNPs 耗竭法在去除高分子量蛋白质(>80kDa)方面效果良好。由于 DTT 和 ACN 试剂之间的协同作用,DTT/ACN 耗竭法在去除富含巯基的蛋白质(如白蛋白和转铁蛋白,DTT 作用)和高分子量蛋白质(ACN 作用)方面表现出色。此外,PM 等化处理证实了其浓缩低丰度蛋白质的效率,降低了人血清中蛋白质水平的动态范围。直接比较处理方法发现,使用 MNP 耗竭法可鉴定出 72 种蛋白质(其中 43 种是该方法独有的),而使用 DTT/ACN 耗竭法只能鉴定出 20 种蛋白质(其中 7 种是该方法独有的)。此外,经 PM 处理后,还鉴定出 30 种蛋白质,其中 7 种是该方法独有的。因此,MNPs 和 DTT/ACN 耗竭法可以作为基于免疫化学的蛋白质耗竭的简单、快速、廉价和强大的替代方法,为寻找疾病生物标志物提供了一种潜在策略。