Cheng Sanyin, Zhang Li-Fang
Am Ann Deaf. 2017;162(1):8-23. doi: 10.1353/aad.2017.0011.
The authors explored how thinking styles relate to quality of university life among deaf or hard of hearing (DHH) and hearing university students in mainland China. The first of two studies affirmed the validity and reliability of a modified version of the Quality of University Life Measure (QULM; Sirgy, Grezskowiak, & Rahtz, 2007) among 833 university students (366 DHH, 467 hearing). The second investigated relationships between thinking styles and quality of university life; the Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II (Sternberg, Wagner, & Zhang, 2007) and modified QULM were administered to 542 students (256 DHH, 286 hearing). Students scoring higher on Type I styles (i.e., more creativity-generating, less structured, cognitively more complex) tended toward greater satisfaction with university life; those scoring higher on Type II (i.e., more norm-favoring, more structured, cognitively more simplistic) tended toward less satisfaction. Contributions, limitations, and implications of the research are discussed.
作者探讨了思维方式与中国大陆聋人或重听（DHH）大学生及听力正常大学生的大学生活质量之间的关系。两项研究中的第一项证实了大学生活质量量表（QULM；Sirgy、Grezskowiak和Rahtz，2007）修订版在833名大学生（366名DHH学生、467名听力正常学生）中的有效性和可靠性。第二项研究调查了思维方式与大学生活质量之间的关系；思维方式量表修订版II（Sternberg、Wagner和Zhang，2007）和修订后的QULM被施用于542名学生（256名DHH学生、286名听力正常学生）。在I型思维方式（即更具创造力、结构更少、认知更复杂）上得分较高的学生往往对大学生活更满意；在II型思维方式（即更倾向于规范、结构更多、认知更简单）上得分较高的学生往往满意度较低。文中讨论了该研究的贡献、局限性和意义。
