• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聋哑及重听青少年学生的思维方式及其与自我效能感的关系。

Thinking styles and their relationship with self-efficacy among deaf and hard-of-hearing adolescent students.

作者信息

Hammad Mohammad Ahmed, Awed Huda Shaaban

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Curr Psychol. 2022 Sep 8:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03597-8.

DOI:10.1007/s12144-022-03597-8
PMID:36097579
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9453716/
Abstract

This study aimed to identify the most common thinking styles of deaf/hard-of-hearing (DHH) and hearing adolescent students, and to examine the extent to which thinking styles predict self-efficacy. It also explored gender-based differences in the thinking styles and self-efficacy of DHH students. Data were collected from 145 DHH and 160 hearing adolescent students in Saudi Arabia (M = 17.8 years; SD = 3.57 years) using the Thinking Styles Inventory-Revised II (TSI-R2) and Self-Efficacy Questionnaire for Children (SEQ-C). Findings revealed that the executive, local, conservative, and chaotic thinking styles were more prevalent among DHH students, while the legislative, universal, liberal, and critical thinking styles were more prevalent among hearing students. Those with Type I thinking styles had higher levels of self-efficacy, while those with Type II thinking styles had lower levels of self-efficacy. There were gender-based differences in the self-efficacy of DHH and hearing students, with higher scores observed among females. Further, for DHH students, the Legislative, Liberal, and Internal thinking styles were more prevalent among males rather than females, while the Executive, Hierarchical, Conservative, External, Judicial, and Local thinking styles were more prevalent among females rather than males. For hearing students, males were more likely to exhibit the Liberal, External, and Oligarchic styles, while females were more likely to exhibit the Global, Executive, Conservative, Local, and Hierarchical styles. Together, these findings suggest the need to train DHH students to use positive thinking styles by implementing courses in their school curricula that enable them to reflect on their self-efficacy.

摘要

本研究旨在确定聋哑/听力障碍(DHH)青少年学生和听力正常的青少年学生最常见的思维方式,并检验思维方式对自我效能感的预测程度。研究还探讨了DHH学生在思维方式和自我效能感方面基于性别的差异。使用修订版思维方式量表II(TSI-R2)和儿童自我效能量表(SEQ-C),从沙特阿拉伯的145名DHH青少年学生和160名听力正常的青少年学生中收集数据(平均年龄 = 17.8岁;标准差 = 3.57岁)。研究结果显示,执行型、局部型、保守型和混乱型思维方式在DHH学生中更为普遍,而立法型、整体型、自由型和批判性思维方式在听力正常的学生中更为普遍。具有I型思维方式的学生自我效能感水平较高,而具有II型思维方式的学生自我效能感水平较低。DHH学生和听力正常的学生在自我效能感方面存在基于性别的差异,女性得分更高。此外,对于DHH学生来说,立法型、自由型和内倾型思维方式在男性中比在女性中更为普遍,而执行型、层级型、保守型、外倾型、司法型和局部型思维方式在女性中比在男性中更为普遍。对于听力正常的学生来说,男性更有可能表现出自由型、外倾型和寡头型思维方式,而女性更有可能表现出整体型、执行型、保守型、局部型和层级型思维方式。总之,这些研究结果表明,有必要通过在学校课程中开设课程,让DHH学生能够反思自己的自我效能感,从而训练他们使用积极的思维方式。

相似文献

1
Thinking styles and their relationship with self-efficacy among deaf and hard-of-hearing adolescent students.聋哑及重听青少年学生的思维方式及其与自我效能感的关系。
Curr Psychol. 2022 Sep 8:1-14. doi: 10.1007/s12144-022-03597-8.
2
Thinking styles of university deaf or hard of hearing students and hearing students.大学聋生或重听学生与听力正常学生的思维方式。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Aug;55:377-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 25.
3
Thinking Styles and University Self-Efficacy Among Deaf, Hard-of-Hearing, and Hearing Students.聋生、重听学生和听力正常学生的思维方式与大学自我效能感
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Jan;21(1):44-53. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env032. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
4
How to Improve Grit Among Deaf or Hard of Hearing Students: The Effect of Thinking Style.如何提高聋人或重听学生的坚毅:思维方式的影响。
Am Ann Deaf. 2024;169(1):40-56. doi: 10.1353/aad.2024.a931188.
5
Thinking style changes among deaf, hard-of-hearing, and hearing students.聋生、重听学生和听力正常学生的思维方式变化。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2015 Jan;20(1):16-26. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enu038. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
6
Thinking Styles and Quality of University Life Among Deaf or Hard of Hearing and Hearing Students.聋人或听力障碍学生与听力正常学生的思维方式及大学生活质量
Am Ann Deaf. 2017;162(1):8-23. doi: 10.1353/aad.2017.0011.
7
Thinking styles and self-determination among university students who are deaf or hard of hearing and hearing university students.聋人或重听大学生与听力大学生的思维风格和自我决定。
Res Dev Disabil. 2019 Feb;85:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2018.11.002. Epub 2018 Nov 21.
8
The role of grit in thinking styles and academic major satisfaction.坚毅在思维方式和专业满意度中的作用。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Sep 20;29(4):527-540. doi: 10.1093/jdsade/enae022.
9
Relationship between thinking styles and the academic achievement of occupational therapy students in Iran.伊朗职业治疗专业学生的思维方式与学业成绩之间的关系。
J Educ Health Promot. 2020 Apr 28;9:82. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_545_19. eCollection 2020.
10
Child maltreatment among deaf and hard-of-hearing adolescent students: associations with depression and anxiety.聋哑及重听青少年学生中的儿童虐待:与抑郁和焦虑的关联
Front Psychol. 2024 Feb 13;15:1287741. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1287741. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
Thinking Style Moderates the Impact of the Classroom Environment on Language Creativity.思维方式调节课堂环境对语言创造力的影响。
J Intell. 2024 Jan 8;12(1):5. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12010005.

本文引用的文献

1
Implications of internalised ableism for the health and wellbeing of disabled young people.内化的残疾歧视对残疾青年的健康和福利的影响。
Sociol Health Illn. 2022 Feb;44(2):360-376. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13425. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
2
Deaf Students as a Linguistic and Cultural Minority: Shifting Perspectives and Implications for Teaching and Learning.作为语言和文化少数群体的聋生:视角转变及其对教学的影响
J Educ (Boston). 2016 Jan;196(1):9-18. doi: 10.1177/002205741619600103. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
3
The Association Between Deaf Identity and Emotional Distress Among Adolescents.聋人身份认同与青少年情绪困扰之间的关系。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 May 30;25(3):251-260. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz051.
4
Personality Traits, Self-Efficacy, and Cochlear Implant Use Among Deaf Young Adults.成年聋人青年的人格特质、自我效能感与人工耳蜗使用情况
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2018 Oct 1;23(4):351-359. doi: 10.1093/deafed/eny022.
5
Thinking Styles and Quality of University Life Among Deaf or Hard of Hearing and Hearing Students.聋人或听力障碍学生与听力正常学生的思维方式及大学生活质量
Am Ann Deaf. 2017;162(1):8-23. doi: 10.1353/aad.2017.0011.
6
Thinking styles of university deaf or hard of hearing students and hearing students.大学聋生或重听学生与听力正常学生的思维方式。
Res Dev Disabil. 2016 Aug;55:377-87. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2016.04.004. Epub 2016 May 25.
7
The Relationship Between Hearing Aid Self-Efficacy and Hearing Aid Satisfaction.助听器自我效能与助听器满意度之间的关系。
Am J Audiol. 2015 Dec;24(4):529-35. doi: 10.1044/2015_AJA-15-0028.
8
Thinking Styles and University Self-Efficacy Among Deaf, Hard-of-Hearing, and Hearing Students.聋生、重听学生和听力正常学生的思维方式与大学自我效能感
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2016 Jan;21(1):44-53. doi: 10.1093/deafed/env032. Epub 2015 Aug 13.
9
Predicting recidivism with the Psychological Inventory of Criminal Thinking Styles (PICTS) in community-supervised male and female federal offenders.运用犯罪思维方式心理量表(PICTS)预测社区监管下的联邦男性和女性罪犯的累犯情况。
Psychol Assess. 2016 Jun;28(6):652-9. doi: 10.1037/pas0000210. Epub 2015 Aug 3.
10
Styles of Learning and Thinking Matter in Instruction and Assessment.学习和思维风格在教学和评估中很重要。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2008 Nov;3(6):486-506. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00095.x.