• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Modified C index: Novel predictor of postoperative renal functional loss of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.改良C指数:腹腔镜肾部分切除术术后肾功能丧失的新型预测指标。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 May;11(5):E215-E221. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4192. Epub 2017 May 9.
2
Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: evaluation of long-term oncological and functional outcomes in 340 patients.腹腔镜与开放肾部分切除术治疗 T1 期肾肿瘤:340 例患者长期肿瘤学和功能结局评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):281-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11280.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
3
Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for renal tumours of high surgical complexity: a single-institute comparison between clampless and clamped procedures.高手术复杂性肾肿瘤行腹腔镜肾部分切除术(LPN)的围手术期及肾功能结局:无阻断与有阻断手术的单机构比较
World J Urol. 2017 Mar;35(3):403-409. doi: 10.1007/s00345-016-1882-7. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
4
Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for complex tumors: comparison of perioperative outcomes.机器人与腹腔镜部分肾切除术治疗复杂肿瘤:围手术期结果比较。
Eur Urol. 2012 Jun;61(6):1257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.03.012. Epub 2012 Mar 17.
5
Retroperitoneal Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Versus Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T1 Renal Hilar Tumor: Comparison of Perioperative Characteristics and Short-Term Functional and Oncologic Outcomes.后腹腔镜下肾部分切除术与根治性肾切除术治疗临床T1期肾门肿瘤:围手术期特征及短期功能和肿瘤学结局比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Oct;28(10):1183-1187. doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0064. Epub 2018 Apr 18.
6
Warm Ischemia-Related Postoperative Renal Dysfunction in Elective Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Recovers During Intermediate-Term Follow-Up.择期腹腔镜肾部分切除术中与热缺血相关的术后肾功能障碍在中期随访期间恢复。
J Endourol. 2015 Sep;29(9):1083-90. doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0146. Epub 2015 Jul 2.
7
Comparison of Partial and Radical Laparascopic Nephrectomy: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes for Clinical T2 Renal Cell Carcinoma.部分腹腔镜肾切除术与根治性腹腔镜肾切除术的比较:T2 期肾癌的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。
J Endourol. 2018 Oct;32(10):950-954. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0199. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
Nephrometry score-guided off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and short-time functional results.肾计量评分引导下的无阻断腹腔镜肾部分切除术:患者选择及短期功能结果
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 21;14(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0914-5.
9
Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage.离断与完全阻断控制腹腔镜肾部分切除术:按临床分期比较。
BJU Int. 2012 May;109(9):1376-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10592.x. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
10
Propensity-score matched analysis comparing robot-assisted with laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.倾向评分匹配分析:比较机器人辅助与腹腔镜下部分肾切除术
BJU Int. 2015 Mar;115(3):437-45. doi: 10.1111/bju.12774. Epub 2014 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Roughness of the renal tumor surface could predict the surgical difficulty of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.肾肿瘤表面的粗糙程度可以预测机器人辅助部分肾切除术的手术难度。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2022 Jul;15(3):591-598. doi: 10.1111/ases.13058. Epub 2022 Mar 21.
2
Comparative study on the curative effect of laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery and renal functions under selective segmental renal artery clamping and main renal artery clamping.选择性肾段动脉阻断与肾主动脉阻断下腹腔镜肾部分切除术疗效及肾功能的对比研究
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Jan-Feb;36(2):121-125. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.2.1505.

本文引用的文献

1
To clamp or not to clamp? Long-term functional outcomes for elective off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.夹闭还是不夹闭?选择性非夹闭腹腔镜部分肾切除术的长期功能结果。
BJU Int. 2016 Feb;117(2):293-9. doi: 10.1111/bju.13309. Epub 2015 Oct 1.
2
Predictors of trifecta outcomes in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses.临床T1a期肾肿块腹腔镜肾部分切除术三联征结果的预测因素
Int J Urol. 2015 Nov;22(11):1000-5. doi: 10.1111/iju.12893. Epub 2015 Aug 6.
3
Renal tumor contact surface area: a novel parameter for predicting complexity and outcomes of partial nephrectomy.肾肿瘤接触表面积:预测部分肾切除术复杂性和结果的新参数。
Eur Urol. 2014 Nov;66(5):884-93. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 19.
4
Partial nephrectomy--contemporary indications, techniques and outcomes.部分肾切除术——当代适应证、技术和结局。
Nat Rev Urol. 2013 May;10(5):275-83. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.69. Epub 2013 Apr 16.
5
Association of tumor size, location, R.E.N.A.L., PADUA and centrality index score with perioperative outcomes and postoperative renal function.肿瘤大小、位置、R.E.N.A.L.、PADUA 和中心性指数评分与围手术期结局和术后肾功能的关系。
J Urol. 2012 Nov;188(5):1684-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.07.043. Epub 2012 Sep 19.
6
Systematic review of perioperative and quality-of-life outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer.手术治疗局限性肾癌的围手术期和生活质量结局的系统评价。
Eur Urol. 2012 Dec;62(6):1097-117. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.07.028. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
7
Is the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system predictive of the functional efficacy of nephron sparing surgery in the solitary kidney?RENAAL 肾肿瘤评分系统是否能预测孤立肾保肾手术的功能疗效?
J Urol. 2012 Sep;188(3):729-35. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.04.115. Epub 2012 Jul 20.
8
Laparoscopic vs open partial nephrectomy for T1 renal tumours: evaluation of long-term oncological and functional outcomes in 340 patients.腹腔镜与开放肾部分切除术治疗 T1 期肾肿瘤:340 例患者长期肿瘤学和功能结局评估。
BJU Int. 2013 Feb;111(2):281-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11280.x. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
9
Nephrometry score is associated with volume loss and functional recovery after partial nephrectomy.肾肿瘤评分与部分肾切除术后的体积损失和功能恢复有关。
J Urol. 2012 Jul;188(1):39-44. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2574. Epub 2012 May 12.
10
Long-term survival following partial vs radical nephrectomy among older patients with early-stage kidney cancer.老年早期肾癌患者行部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术的长期生存比较。
JAMA. 2012 Apr 18;307(15):1629-35. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.475.

改良C指数:腹腔镜肾部分切除术术后肾功能丧失的新型预测指标。

Modified C index: Novel predictor of postoperative renal functional loss of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

作者信息

Ito Hiroki, Makiyama Kazuhide, Kawahara Takashi, Osaka Kimito, Izumi Koji, Yokomizo Yumiko, Nakaigawa Noboru, Yao Masahiro

机构信息

Department of Urology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2017 May;11(5):E215-E221. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.4192. Epub 2017 May 9.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.4192
PMID:28503237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5426944/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to develop a scoring system to quantify the distance between the renal hilum and renal tumour, termed the modified C index (m-CI), and to predict renal functional loss (RFL) following laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN).

METHODS

The m-CI was measured by using computed tomography in 113 patients who underwent LPN between May 2003 and June 2014. The RFL following LPN was calculated by examining the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and radioisotope renography one year postoperatively. The Pythagorean theorem was used to calculate the distance from the tumour centre to the renal hilum. The distance was divided by the tumour radius to obtain the m-CI. The correlation between the m-CI and the postoperative RFL were evaluated using Pearson's coefficient values. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to assess the potential predictive factors of RFL following LPN. The correlation between the m-CI and the operative time, ischemia time, and blood loss during LPN were also evaluated by the unpaired t-test.

RESULTS

Pearson's coefficient values between the postoperative RFL and the m-CI and C index were 0.294 and 0.173, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the resected volume (p=0.031) and m-CI (p=0.036) significantly correlated with the postoperative RFL following LPN. The operative time (p<0.001), ischemia time (p=0.028), and blood loss (p=0.047) during LPN was significantly longer and larger, respectively, in the group with shorter m-CI (≤4.5) than in the group with the longer m-CI (>4.5).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study demonstrates that the m-CI can predict RFL following LPN, as well as the surgical difficulty.

摘要

引言

我们旨在开发一种评分系统,用于量化肾门与肾肿瘤之间的距离,称为改良C指数(m-CI),并预测腹腔镜肾部分切除术(LPN)后肾功能丧失(RFL)情况。

方法

在2003年5月至2014年6月期间接受LPN的113例患者中,使用计算机断层扫描测量m-CI。通过术后一年检查估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)和放射性核素肾图来计算LPN后的RFL。使用勾股定理计算肿瘤中心到肾门的距离。将该距离除以肿瘤半径以获得m-CI。使用Pearson系数值评估m-CI与术后RFL之间的相关性。使用多变量逻辑回归模型评估LPN后RFL的潜在预测因素。还通过不成对t检验评估m-CI与LPN期间手术时间、缺血时间和失血量之间的相关性。

结果

术后RFL与m-CI和C指数之间的Pearson系数值分别为0.294和0.173。在多变量分析中,切除体积(p = 0.031)和m-CI(p = 0.036)与LPN术后的RFL显著相关。m-CI较短(≤4.5)组的LPN手术时间(p < 0.001)、缺血时间(p = 0.028)和失血量(p = 0.047)分别明显长于和多于m-CI较长(> 4.5)组。

结论

本研究表明,m-CI可以预测LPN后的RFL以及手术难度。