Zahid Hira, Amin Aisha, Amin Emaan, Waheed Summaiya, Asad Ameema, Faheem Ariba, Jawaid Samreen, Afzal Adila, Misbah Sarah, Majid Kanza
Internal Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan.
Internal Medicine, Jinnah Sindh Medical University (SMC).
Cureus. 2017 Apr 11;9(4):e1155. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1155.
Few studies have looked at the predictors of use of home sphygmomanometers among hypertensive patients in low-income countries such as Pakistan. Considering the importance of home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM), cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate the prevalence and predictors of the usage of all kinds of HBPM devices.
This study was conducted in Karachi during the time period of January-February 2017. Adult patients previously diagnosed with hypertension visiting tertiary care hospitals were selected for the study. Interviews from the individuals were conducted after verbal consent using a pre-coded questionnaire. The data was analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences v. 23.0 (SPSS, IBM Corporation, NY, USA). Chi-squared test was applied as the primary statistical test.
More than half of the participants used a home sphygmomanometer (n=250, 61.7%). The age, level of education, family history of hypertension, compliance to drugs and blood pressure (BP) monitoring, few times a month at clinics were significant determinants of HBPM (P values < 0.001). It was found that more individuals owned a digital sphygmomanometer (n=128, 51.3%) as compared to a manual type (n=122, 48.8%). Moreover, avoiding BP measurement in a noisy environment was the most common precaution taken (n=117, 46.8%).
The study showed that around 40% of the hypertensive individuals did not own a sphygmomanometer and less than 25% performed HBPM regularly. General awareness by healthcare professionals can be a possible factor which can increase HBPM.
在巴基斯坦等低收入国家,很少有研究关注高血压患者使用家用血压计的预测因素。鉴于家庭血压监测(HBPM)的重要性,开展了一项横断面研究,以评估各类HBPM设备的使用情况及预测因素。
本研究于2017年1月至2月在卡拉奇进行。选取此前被诊断为高血压且前往三级医疗机构就诊的成年患者作为研究对象。在获得口头同意后,使用预先编码的问卷对个体进行访谈。数据采用社会科学统计软件包第23.0版(SPSS,美国纽约IBM公司)进行分析。卡方检验作为主要统计检验方法。
超过一半的参与者使用家用血压计(n = 250,61.7%)。年龄、教育程度、高血压家族史、药物依从性和血压(BP)监测情况、每月在诊所测量血压的次数是HBPM的重要决定因素(P值<0.001)。结果发现,拥有数字血压计的个体(n = 128,51.3%)比手动血压计的个体(n = 122,48.8%)更多。此外,在嘈杂环境中避免测量血压是最常采取的预防措施(n = 117,46.8%)。
研究表明,约40%的高血压患者没有血压计,不到25%的患者定期进行HBPM。医疗保健专业人员的普遍宣传可能是增加HBPM的一个因素。