• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分心步行、骑车和开车:移动技术与青年碰撞风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Distracted Walking, Bicycling, and Driving: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mobile Technology and Youth Crash Risk.

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham.

Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital.

出版信息

Child Dev. 2018 Jan;89(1):118-128. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12827. Epub 2017 May 15.

DOI:10.1111/cdev.12827
PMID:28504303
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5685949/
Abstract

This article examined the impact of mobile technology on young pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers. A systematic search yielded 41 articles meeting inclusion criteria: peer-reviewed, published before February 1, 2016, behavioral outcome related to pedestrian, bicycling, or driving in the presence of mobile technology use, youth sample. Eleven studies were meta-analyzed to evaluate increased risk for crash/near-crash while distracted. Risk of bias and quality of research were assessed. Across methodologies, developmental stages, and type of distracting task, mobile technology use impairs youth safety on the road. Quality of evidence was low (pedestrian) to moderate (driving). Findings are discussed from the perspective of cognitive and visual distractions. Policy and behavioral efforts should continue to reduce mobile technology use in transportation settings.

摘要

本文研究了移动技术对年轻行人和自行车骑行者及驾驶员的影响。系统检索得到了 41 篇符合纳入标准的文章:同行评审,发表于 2016 年 2 月 1 日之前,与行人、骑自行车或在使用移动技术时驾驶行为结果相关,青年样本。11 项研究进行了荟萃分析,以评估分心时发生碰撞/险些碰撞的风险增加。评估了偏倚风险和研究质量。跨方法、发展阶段和分心任务类型,移动技术的使用会损害道路上青年的安全。证据质量为低(行人)至中(驾驶)。从认知和视觉干扰的角度讨论了研究结果。应继续从政策和行为方面努力减少在交通环境中使用移动技术。

相似文献

1
Distracted Walking, Bicycling, and Driving: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mobile Technology and Youth Crash Risk.分心步行、骑车和开车:移动技术与青年碰撞风险的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Child Dev. 2018 Jan;89(1):118-128. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12827. Epub 2017 May 15.
2
Fatalities of pedestrians, bicycle riders, and motorists due to distracted driving motor vehicle crashes in the U.S., 2005-2010.2005-2010 年美国因分心驾驶机动车事故导致的行人和骑车人、机动车驾驶者死亡人数。
Public Health Rep. 2013 Nov-Dec;128(6):436-42. doi: 10.1177/003335491312800603.
3
Pedestrians, cyclists among main road traffic crash victims.行人、骑自行车者是道路交通碰撞事故的主要受害者。
Indian J Med Sci. 2009 Jun;63(6):274-6.
4
Distracted Biking: An Observational Study.分心骑行:一项观察性研究。
J Trauma Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(2):65-70. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000188.
5
Safety in numbers: more walkers and bicyclists, safer walking and bicycling.人多安全:步行者和骑自行车的人越多,步行和骑自行车就越安全。
Inj Prev. 2015 Aug;21(4):271-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.9.3.205rep.
6
Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.道路基础设施和交通复杂性对分心驾驶者速度适应行为的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Apr;101:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.018. Epub 2017 Feb 10.
7
Effects of mobile phone distraction on pedestrians' crossing behavior and visual attention allocation at a signalized intersection: An outdoor experimental study.手机分心对行人在有信号交叉口的穿行行为和视觉注意分配的影响:一项户外实验研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:170-177. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.019. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
8
A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.驾驶员在手机通话中分心时的反应时间的参数持续时间模型。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Jan;62:42-53. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.09.010. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
9
Exposure-based traffic crash injury rates by mode of travel in British Columbia.基于暴露的不列颠哥伦比亚省交通碰撞伤害率,按出行方式划分。
Can J Public Health. 2013 Jan 8;104(1):e75-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03405659.
10
Pedestrian self-reported use of smart phones: Positive attitudes and high exposure influence intentions to cross the road while distracted.行人自我报告的智能手机使用情况:积极态度和高暴露度会影响分心时过马路的意图。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Jan;98:338-347. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.028. Epub 2016 Nov 5.

引用本文的文献

1
"It's okay because I'm just driving": an exploration of self-reported mobile phone use among Mexican drivers.“没事,因为我只是在开车时用手机”:对墨西哥司机自述使用手机情况的探索。
PeerJ. 2024 Feb 23;12:e16899. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16899. eCollection 2024.
2
Altered gait parameters in distracted walking: a bio-evolutionary and prognostic health perspective on passive listening and active responding during cell phone use.分心行走时步态参数的改变:从生物进化和健康预后角度看手机使用过程中的被动聆听与主动回应
Front Integr Neurosci. 2023 Nov 10;17:1135495. doi: 10.3389/fnint.2023.1135495. eCollection 2023.
3
An umbrella review of the benefits and risks associated with youths' interactions with electronic screens.

本文引用的文献

1
Experiential exposure to texting and walking in virtual reality: A randomized trial to reduce distracted pedestrian behavior.虚拟现实中短信收发与行走的体验式接触:一项减少行人分心行为的随机试验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:116-122. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.026. Epub 2017 Mar 6.
2
Differential impact of personality traits on distracted driving behaviors in teens and older adults.人格特质对青少年和老年人分心驾驶行为的不同影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jul;92:107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
3
Safety-critical event risk associated with cell phone tasks as measured in naturalistic driving studies: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
青少年与电子屏幕互动的益处和风险的伞式综述。
Nat Hum Behav. 2024 Jan;8(1):82-99. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01712-8. Epub 2023 Nov 13.
4
Evaluation of Psychophysical Fitness in Drivers over 65 Years of Age.65岁以上驾驶员心理体能评估
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Jul 3;11(13):1927. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11131927.
5
A hierarchical cluster analysis of young drivers based on their perceived risk and frequency of texting while driving.基于感知风险和驾车时发短信频率的年轻驾驶员层次聚类分析。
J Safety Res. 2023 Jun;85:398-404. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.04.007. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
6
Family matters: A systematic review and meta-analysis on the efficacy of family-oriented interventions for children with acquired brain injuries.家庭因素的影响:针对后天性脑损伤儿童的以家庭为导向的干预措施的疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2023 Feb;99:102218. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2022.102218. Epub 2022 Nov 5.
7
Distracted pedestrian behavior: An observational study of risk by situational environments.分心行人行为:基于情境环境的风险观察研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2022;23(6):346-351. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2022.2076282. Epub 2022 May 26.
8
Risk Factors for Road-Traffic Injuries Associated with E-Bike: Case-Control and Case-Crossover Study.电动自行车相关道路交通伤害的危险因素:病例对照和病例交叉研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 24;19(9):5186. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19095186.
9
Support for distracted driving laws: An analysis of adolescent drivers from the Traffic Safety Culture Index from 2011 to 2017.对分心驾驶法律的支持:对2011年至2017年交通安全文化指数中青少年驾驶员的分析。
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav. 2021 Apr;78:424-432. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.02.022. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
10
A Systematic Review on the Impact of Hot and Cool Executive Functions on Pediatric Injury Risks: a Meta-Analytic Structural Equation Modeling Approach.系统评价:热执行功能和冷执行功能对儿童伤害风险的影响:元分析结构方程模型方法。
Prev Sci. 2022 Apr;23(3):366-377. doi: 10.1007/s11121-021-01271-2. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
自然主义驾驶研究中测量的与手机任务相关的安全关键事件风险:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Feb;87:161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.11.015. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
4
Preliminary research developing a theory of cell phone distraction and social relationships.关于手机干扰与社会关系理论的初步研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Jan;86:155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.10.023. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
5
Teen Drivers' Perceptions of Inattention and Cell Phone Use While Driving.青少年驾驶员对驾驶时注意力不集中和使用手机的认知
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2(0):S52-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1062886.
6
The effect of text messaging on reactive balance and the temporal and spatial characteristics of gait.短信对反应性平衡及步态时空特征的影响。
Gait Posture. 2015 Oct;42(4):580-3. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
7
Naturalistic teenage driving study: Findings and lessons learned.青少年自然驾驶研究:研究结果与经验教训
J Safety Res. 2015 Sep;54:41-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2015.06.010. Epub 2015 Aug 1.
8
Gait Pattern Alterations during Walking, Texting and Walking and Texting during Cognitively Distractive Tasks while Negotiating Common Pedestrian Obstacles.在认知干扰任务期间行走、发短信以及边行走边发短信时的步态模式变化,同时应对常见行人障碍物。
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 29;10(7):e0133281. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133281. eCollection 2015.
9
How do drivers behave during indecision zone maneuvers?驾驶员在犹豫区操作时的行为表现如何?
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Nov;96:274-279. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.04.023. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
10
The Effect of Secondary Task Engagement on Adolescents' Driving Performance and Crash Risk.次要任务参与对青少年驾驶表现和碰撞风险的影响。
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jul;57(1 Suppl):S36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.03.014.